Комментарии:
You didn't show the rotational motion
Ответитьit isn't true. this is 3 into 3, we need 3 into 4.
ОтветитьYou shouldn't pause the gravity during the video, it's makes people Think gravity stops flowing...
ОтветитьStill just a visualization. Has nothing to do with the actual mathematical model of spacetime.
ОтветитьFor the first time I see a 3d depiction of bending of space time. Thank you.
ОтветитьWhen we say "space-time" are we referring to the actual vacuum of space as well as time?
ОтветитьGravity holding us is like the coin caught between the ass and the cushion.
ОтветитьThis presentation is purely useless sigh, when you move your finger into a curve, then the base of your finger travel at the same speed as the top of your finger, but the curve of the top of your finger is longer than the one of the base of your finger. How do you explain that ? Because it mean that the top of your finger reached a point B from a point A longer than the base of your finger at the same SPEED and same TIME, and, the base of your finger traveled a lesser curve with the same time & speed than the top of your finger with a longer curve !! Your presentation don't show the dilatation of time at all ! It's only space, but time in your presentation should be the opposite and it should grow bigger when you are close to the sun and not smaller and condensed ! Because time is slower when your are close to massive objects !
ОтветитьJust like magnet
ОтветитьThese idiots are just lying to be different.
Stop lying! Liar liar pants on fire!
ALL COMMENTS HERE ARE LIES!
THEY LYING!
THIS VIDEO IS LYING TO ME!!!!
THE FIRST ONE IS ACCURATE AND CAN BE REPRESENTED, BUT THE SECOND ONE IS CONFUSING AND CANT BE REPRESENTED WITH ANYTHING,
WHY
Would first one be an example of a sun exploding?
ОтветитьThis makes sense. Not the trampolene example.
ОтветитьTo explain how light would curve when traveling close to a massive object that bents space and time, you would also need the rotational movement, correct?
Ответить"وَالسَّمَاءِ ذَاتِ الْحُبُكِ"
"By the heaven with its pathways (woven fabric)."
(Quran, Surah Adh-Dhariyat 51:7)
Finally a 3D representation that is much better than the 2D “rubber sheet” representation of a mass causing space to curve. But realize that the curvature is not just along the x, y and z axes, but in all directions 4π radians around the mass. Now if there were only a way to also incorporate the 4th time dimension visually. Maybe that’s asking too much.
ОтветитьStolen from the channel @scienceclic
ОтветитьI don’t get yall, I literally se lines going away how is it accurate.
ОтветитьI really appreciate these visualization for those whose eager to learn ❤
But let me remind everyone it not the exact yet because we still have 'time' and we're still figuring out how to represent a 4D continuum in a 3D world visualizing most studies in 2D.
Great one!
There is no fabric, I will solve it
ОтветитьHoly shit, the comments makes me laugh. everyone thinks they’re an expert huh?
ОтветитьIt is harder to understand the latter simulation. That's why they show the first one, it's just easier to understand that way.
ОтветитьBut why Galaxy and solar system spiral Flat
ОтветитьFAITH IS IN EVERTHING THANK YOU JESUS
ОтветитьSo the object doesn't push fabric downwards like trampoline. It gets squeezed and pulls toward objects? Right? Plz anyone explain 😢
ОтветитьI cannot understand the concept here😢
ОтветитьI always wanted to see this one.
ОтветитьThis is not the actual representation because the fabrics need to be pulled constantly into the object that disturb it
ОтветитьThis is how i actually imagined lol, more than 1 layer of fabric of space and time
ОтветитьScienceclic English
ОтветитьEarth is an enclosed system. Space is fake.
ОтветитьBut what about super heavy objects like neutron stars and black holes? It seems like with this visualization we quickly max out the amount of bending and warping that space can do. It can only pull in so close to the object itself. In 2D representation, they show a massive drop like a wind sock for a black hole. I see that’s the opposite of this, with it warping away from the mass. I’m having trouble seeing how it should be in 3D
ОтветитьI mean both have some proof behind them. The 2D version shows how massive they are by how much they are pressing down on the space time fabric causing the other objects to get pulled into orbit. I’m no expert so I’m wondering which is right myself.
ОтветитьHow does it work for “planet “ like Pluto which orbit in both vertical and horizontal way around the sun
ОтветитьYas 4 dimensions
ОтветитьI always wonder if I were to point my head down and go down continuously would the fabric of space interfere or stop me? How can it manipulate planets and not a regular object going straight north, or south, etc. this kind of makes sense.
Ответить4D view in 3D world
ОтветитьNow put the square SO SMALL that we dont see them and put infinite time the amout you see
ОтветитьIm still lost, wtf am i looking at?
ОтветитьI definitely seen someone do this rep (ScienceClic) so like stop stealing 😂😂😂
ОтветитьYeah, I always thought it showing it on. The 2-D plane was weird because gravity affects all directions equally.
ОтветитьYes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Finally!
ОтветитьIn the 3D view the lines should expand away the object so it’s not accurate! Fabric is the best example 🎉
ОтветитьThat was also my theory once! But it was made before I was born. I made it with no information of this though. Trust!
ОтветитьOkay we can't see the string of newton but the problem still same when we even can't see the fabric of Einstein 😅
ОтветитьNo, this is not.
Ответитьcan we even imagine space time since it's basically in another dimension, 4d
ОтветитьIf only i could visualise in my head teleparallel gravity. :(
ОтветитьIllusive theory!
-by Lord Sri Ram