Комментарии:
Definitely better than the nebula micro and nano
ОтветитьTo me nebula is better(less vibrations)
Ответитьwhy does the mipi have so much jello? its mounted on the same frame right?
ОтветитьDefinitely a good low light performer!
Ответитьconclusion: wan't to fly night time?...go for MIPI?
ОтветитьWith Low latency for shure the nebula pro the mipi just have quality mode :(
ОтветитьI have the mipi wasn't impressed at all going from sun to shade it will turn to almost black and white the colors are always changing and alot of pink, mabe I got a bad one?
ОтветитьAmazing, thank you Gal!👍
ОтветитьHi Gal, I prefer nebula pro 👍
better color
thank for comparison 😉
wow ... night and day differences ... hard to choose ... thanks for your effort and sharing! ¶ :-)
Ответитьthanks! 👍
ОтветитьLook at that low light performance
ОтветитьWhich colour temperature is closer to what your eyes perceive? Is the ground vegetation green or more of a brown colour?
ОтветитьFantastic flying and testing, Gal! 😃
Pretty impressive results! The Mipi seems more sensitive to vibrations, but the low light performance is fantastic! 😮
Anyway, stay safe there with your family! 🖖😊
my camera is on its way, i like it and good in low light too thats important
ОтветитьIf its available and maybe cheaper than the nebula pro and vista compatible, then I will denenatly consider buying one
ОтветитьThanks for doing this, much appreciated. The side-by-side comparison is so informative.
To me, Nebula Pro seems to offer better default color curve for daylight and bright situations. The MIPI seems offer better color curve with dawn/dusk and shines in low light.
Guessing with image histogram data, one could post-process video (extra time and effort). Processing would give better results with whichever camera was least saturated for given conditions.
Another possibility could be to use filter, but there is no one right filter that could correct for all conditions. (this would probably drive a person crazy)
It thus amounts to picking the right camera for expected (typical) flying conditions. ;)
This why Gal's comparisons are so useful. :)
So this camera trasform every place in mexico
ОтветитьBoth looked nice 👌different but nice
ОтветитьThat's staggeringly better than I thought it would be.
ОтветитьYeah low light is it's strength. Other than that the colours are off, it's only 60fps and it won't be supported in the future AU/CV firmware updates.
ОтветитьHave Caddx quit making the Nebula Pro or is it just in short supply due to the chip shortage?
ОтветитьGood camera for long range cruising maybe, since it doesn't support 120Hz it's not the camera for freestyle, let alone racers.
ОтветитьRuncams tell tale orange cast.....the colours off for sure, low light isn't too good either.
I wouldn't buy it...🤔🤔😯🇬🇧
contrast seems richer on runcam, with improved sharpenss of edging in grass etc.
there is more saturation, but detail seems better for the purpose of flying and seeing ghost branches and stuff. where the nebula pro has a more cinematic softer rendition that is more softer or go-pro style nice post-view. we should support runcam for this great effort, I like the image very much and like the rich warm somewhat 'artificially boosted' colour settings for fpv piloting purposes, and for differentiating terrain. exciting product!
Lets see how long caddx vista and air units will Support third party cams. Already heard they are planing on blocking them. Not now but to come sometime
ОтветитьCaddx have outdone themselves again i see. The colours are a lot more vibrant
ОтветитьGreat comparison. Thanks!
ОтветитьLow light performance was shocking 😮😮😮😮
ОтветитьWhy does your flight platform have so much jello? Makes it very hard to focus and see details to compare fine image settings.
ОтветитьI have bought Runcam
ОтветитьI wish you had fix the jello before making the video. Runcam is way cheaper then Caddx. And just for that the runcam is great! Thanks
ОтветитьI was under the impression that Runcam was going to be locked out of the Air Unit / Cadax Air Unit due to new encryption that is going to be used...
ОтветитьExcellent job..really appreciate what you do....THANK YOU
ОтветитьRuncam failed at color grading and lens distortion correction (Fisheye),
but the low light performance is great.
Is the fov the same?
Not alot of options out there thanks runcam, but i would still like to get a hold of a Caddx Nebula Pro, cant seem to find any where ugh
ОтветитьI don't like the oversharpened look of the Caddix, the Runcam feels more natural to me (and it even comes with a free trip to Mexico).
Ответитьso as a newb how do you connect the runcam mipi do you need a seperate piece of kit like that little silver block thing or am i missing something? cheers
ОтветитьWhy am I seeing a 1080p 120 fps runcam ? That can't be right can it
Ответить