Комментарии:
It’s exciting to see the return of Panasonic to America. I’m currently using a Panasonic Plasma from over a decade ago, and it brings me back to a time where brands could be trusted and television technology was rapidly changing.
ОтветитьFire TV?? That kills it.
ОтветитьDolby vision and HDR10+ has it for me
ОтветитьAbby needs a shave😮😮😂😂
ОтветитьExtreeemely bad value. G4 is muuuch cheaper.
ОтветитьThanks for reviewing this awesome TV!
ОтветитьHey alex. Im sure abby fans will not be happy for a bit lol but yeah fire t.v OS is con for this one but yeah using something external like Roku or the mac variant on it might be only sub for it
ОтветитьIntegrated FireTV is a dealbreaker. What a waste... e-waste to be specific.
Ответить!!! Abby !!!
ОтветитьGreat TV -- but for that price you are probably better off with a G4 or A95L, which are both better TVs. Heck you can probably get the G4 for significantly cheaper (at least in the US).
ОтветитьGlad their back, BUT the value is terrible. I'll stick with my S89C.
ОтветитьMaybe you guys should stop saying back in North America here as I asked Panasonic Canada about the Canadian market and they told me exclusively in the US for now… unless something has changed in the last month…?!?
ОтветитьI don't get it why FireTV is perceived not good. To me it seems not better or worse than GoogleTV or other tv operating system.
Alex, check again because it seems the TV supports Chromecast
I bought this one for 3300 in 77 inch. Great picture quality.
And imagine what they can do with the pentonic 1000. They maxed the the last one out.
Good job Alex! I know everybody loves Abby, myself included, but I thought you did great.
ОтветитьWho tf is this, and what have you done with Abby?!
ОтветитьSwivel is a nice feature, shame barely any TV's are swivel anymore. Have to buy a swivel vesa stand to get that functionality nowadays.
ОтветитьWhy try to cram in a surround system instead of 2 better quality stereo speakers?
ОтветитьAre you sure the G4 is on the bottom right & not the A95L? With the reddish tint, it looks more like the A95L & its QD-OLED panel.
ОтветитьYes. YES! this is what I'm talking about. Give us THICK TVs! with heatsinks!
But I'm still not moving from my C1, as it's still the best for gaming by far thanks to BFI support.
I love abbys watermelons
ОтветитьQuantum TV hates MLA
ОтветитьI would have bought this here in Japan if it didn’t have a soundbar
ОтветитьPanasonic took the sonic part too seriously on this one
just make a tv
When is Panasonic going to figure out that the buying public will give them 200-300 dollar grace in their pricing over other televisions if they would do one simple thing: provide a backlit remote.
ОтветитьIs the A95L and G4 correctly labeled in the comparison? QD usually shows more of a red shift and the G4 pic looks absolutely horrible. There is no green in the trees. Just a muddy brown like color.
ОтветитьThe brightness scores need to be significantly lower 5 or lower
Ответитьmmm I love a THICK TV. Much more room in there for things I like such as speakers and cooling apparatus
ОтветитьLook I would prefer Abby, we all would. But Alex is not a bad substitute teacher. Thanks Alex!!
ОтветитьThe speaker system is useless to me as I already have a home sound system. So that it adds unnecessary cost.
ОтветитьNo mention of DTS support in the review. Pretty pointless including a surround system if Blu-Ray playback is crippled by a lack of DTS.
ОтветитьQuite disappointing. Mediocre HDR in game mode and gradient, but still costs a fortune...
ОтветитьOnly 2.1 HDMI ports is a no go for me. I guess I'll be getting a S95D.
ОтветитьRtings clearly makes Panasonic look average lol. Must be on purpuse
ОтветитьThis dude must have video hosted somewhere else? Seems so natural to him that this can't be his starting level! Great job! 👏
ОтветитьAny chance of some more info please as i have this on my shortlist of tvs. What do films look like on this? Is the motion fluid? Is it better than the g4 or the a95l? What is gaming like on this? Where's Abby? Thanks.
ОтветитьWhat’s a good OLED/QLED TV UNDER $2000
ОтветитьWhy didn’t they use QD-OLED and produce at least an 83 inch TV. Also why are you making funny faces?
ОтветитьWatching TV shows rated lower rtings. Why ?
ОтветитьThe lack of DTS support is simply a NO GO for a flagship TV.
ОтветитьI worked for Panasonic in the 90s when they were in their uk pomp. Great to see their return.
Im thinking of pulling the trigger on rhe mz800b 65 inch OLED which is bub 1000 usd atm
Would you recommend this oled tv ?
It's not a Panasonic, it's a Vestel TV with Panasonic branding.
ОтветитьHow is the VRR support? Any of the issues like you'd find in the TCL TVs?
ОтветитьHow the sound compares to an old Rear Projection TV with big cone speakers and a box subwoofer inside? For example a Sony Grand Wega?
Also how low can the bass on the Panasonic Z95A get when adjusting the sound modes, equalizer and bass?
We want Abby back!
ОтветитьLG G4 is better
ОтветитьQuestion about the built in sound system, seems fine if your Blurays have Atmos soundtracks - but what if ( like most ) have DTS-HD or Dolby true HD, it cant play these so you are limited to dolby digital from discs?!
Ответить