Комментарии:
Love your vids keep it up
ОтветитьI thought Austin was an Oasis fan and that this was about their album 'Be Here Now'.
ОтветитьThe camera man definitely has one of the easiest jobs ever. All he has to do is to film the same spot.
ОтветитьI would've just sat the camera down and been like "alright, I'm going to the bathroom".
ОтветитьThank goodness for rentals.
ОтветитьCollege Football >>>>> Here
ОтветитьSo no other locations
ОтветитьYou could have saved yourself a lot of time and stopped at "There's a new Robert Zemeckis movie." We already know what that means nowadays, sadly. 😢
ОтветитьMore like, "Get outta HERE!"
OK, I'll see myself out! 😂😅
Oh, it's here.
ОтветитьGimmicks seem to be the only thing these legacy directors have going for them lately
Ответитьreminds of Marley and me. When a couple Jennifer Aniston and Owen Wilson have their story told through a dog's life. But this is good.
Watch this.
Honestly, the way you describe it sounds like it’s a cheap movie. It’s actually well done and I think it’s gonna hit some people differently then others
ОтветитьThe de-aging was actually solid & the visuals were great! What are you talking about! I thought this film was exceptionally good and flowed great. This film never lost me but I guess I understood what they were doing and was actually really invested.
ОтветитьHard pass on this one. Thanks for your review!
ОтветитьI thought this movie was horrible. So very disappointed especially with all the talent involved. What a waste.
ОтветитьAustin you should go watch Your Monster if you havent, surprise how much fun I had with that movie .
ОтветитьHere would've worked better if it focused only on Tom Hanks and Robin Wright.
ОтветитьCONTACT was his last great movie and Jodie Foster was amazing!!! That;s nearly 30 years ago, right?
ОтветитьNothing wrong with the CGI and deaging. The reality is, if you'd never seen these actors before, you'd never know they'd been deaged. Your looking out for it, because you know its there. If you didn't know, you wouldn't be looking out for it, that simple.
ОтветитьW0W!
ОтветитьGreat review.
ОтветитьUff, a 40, that's rough. Yet I've heard good things about it.
ОтветитьLove the new logo Austin and we’ll keep up the amazing reviews .
ОтветитьEvery scene seemed like a high school play. And of course they had to crow bar the BLM-ish things in. Hollywood can’t resist
ОтветитьThis movie is really bad. LOL!
Ответить“Juror #2” is very good. I saw it yesterday (Saturday)
ОтветитьForrest Gump my favorite followed by Back to the Future trilogy, Cast Away, Who Framed Roger Rabbit
ОтветитьUnfortunately this looks like a hard pass, austin are you watching heretic ! Wow Hugh grant is just phenomenal , really good twisty wee horror/thriller
Ответитьthanks for the spoiler. Dislike
ОтветитьAre you planning to review Agatha All Along?
ОтветитьI loved this movie.
ОтветитьI was surprised with how charmed I was by it.
Ответить👍
ОтветитьDo JUROR #2
ОтветитьThis film is watching a boring textbook drama with pop up ads. I had compared the editing to that of HULK, in 2003 with the comic panel editing
ОтветитьI saw it and loved it, fuck the critics.
ОтветитьOk, I was about to head out to watch this, now I’m definitely gonna wait until it hits streaming.
ОтветитьYou do make some fair points here (even some I can agree with) that said I still enjoyed the movie 😅
ОтветитьThis is the cloud atlas of our generation lol
ОтветитьI don't understand how this movie is so misunderstood. I thought it was easy to follow. I saw it in the theater and I was late. I came in just as Paul Bettany and his wife Rose buy the house missing the setup. Speaking of Bettany he steals the movie IMO. I want to quote so many of his lines. "Find a job where you have to wear a suit!". I also really enjoyed the visual & audible symmetry. Like where the pilot is talking to his wife Lady Mary Crawley(Downton Abbey) and it transitions to Paul Bettany on the phone. Another moment is the indigenous woman being pregnant along with Robin Wrights character. I also enjoyed the little changes and the inclusion of historic events like pearl harbor and the Beatles. My favorite secondary story is the lazyboy inventor and his amazing beautiful wife. The score is also amazing. I'd give this a 6.9/10.
ОтветитьI adored this movie, but it’s not for everyone.
ОтветитьJeremy Jahns talked about this.
ОтветитьI cried.. it is a very emotional movie
ОтветитьI liked this movie! Yes, it is a lot to get into and follow all the characters over the time, but eventually you do and it is emotional, and cinematic magic. Don’t listen to the bad reviews, it is a great movie!
ОтветитьI agree with you. Saw it yesterday with 3 friends. Awful movie. Waste of talented actors.
ОтветитьSaw it ! Boring !!!! The one camera angle in one room thing was annoying . It would have been better if they could have moved to different rooms of the house and we would have gotten to know the people more
Ответитьit has its flaws and the effects were at times distracting but i loved this movie. i got swept away in every characters story. wonderful performances.
ОтветитьI’m gunna disagree with you here. (And ON Here). I found this movie very inter and inventive. I was very invested in Tom Hanks’ family and also the early 1900’s family with the pilot. The others felt a little tacked on, the native Americans, Lazy boy guy, 2020’s family felt unnecessary but they filled in the gaps for the 200 years so they served their purpose.
Ответить