Audemars Piguet Code 11.59 White Gold (15210BC.OO.A002KB.01) AP Watch Review

Audemars Piguet Code 11.59 White Gold (15210BC.OO.A002KB.01) AP Watch Review

The 1916 Company Watch Reviews

5 дней назад

4,297 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@FirestormAA
@FirestormAA - 23.12.2024 15:01

Code 11.59 started to look good for me..

Ответить
@MichiPlank
@MichiPlank - 23.12.2024 15:12

The Code is a nice watch and a worthy Jules audemars successor. But not 26k$-ish nice or whatever the retail of it was

Ответить
@DrFearCo
@DrFearCo - 23.12.2024 15:20

Doesn’t really look like a dress watch to me. More like an every-day sport watch.

Ответить
@petersampson5202
@petersampson5202 - 23.12.2024 15:41

DEAR MR. MOSSO & MR. GOVBERG,

HAPPY HOLIDAYS. 🎅

GOD BLESS YOU MY FRIENDS.

I LOVE YOU SO VERY MUCH MR. MOSSO.

I LOVE YOU SO VERY MUCH MR. GOVBERG.

I LOVE MR. ESPARZA AND ALL OF MY BEAUTIFUL FRIENDS SO VERY MUCH.

I LOVE MY WONDERFUL PARENTS SO VERY MUCH.

EVERYTHING HAS BEEN A MIRACLE AND A MIRACLE AND A MIRACLE AND FAR BEYOND ANYTHING THAT I HAVE EVER IMAGINED. WOW! WOW! WOW! WOW! WOW! WOW! WOW! WOW!

EVERYTHING HAS BEEN SUCH A PROFOUND BLESSING AND AN ABSOLUTE MIRACLE.

WOW! WOW! WOW! WOW! WOW! WOW! WOW!

SINCERELY PETER

Ответить
@Doggo-frencton
@Doggo-frencton - 23.12.2024 16:54

These watches would seem a much better value if it wasn’t for ateliers like Moritz Grossmann and Laurent Ferrier blowing them out of the water at a similar price point.

Ответить
@macfan128
@macfan128 - 23.12.2024 18:16

looks good on your wrist, just too big for a dress watch

Ответить
@aesthetilicius
@aesthetilicius - 23.12.2024 19:53

🥱🥱

Ответить
@sensible202
@sensible202 - 23.12.2024 21:05

Looks good but too big for dress watch.

Ответить
@adiands850
@adiands850 - 24.12.2024 00:07

I disagree with Tim that this is a dress watch. It's too large and chunky. Lacks elegance.

Ответить
@josepjosephson5986
@josepjosephson5986 - 24.12.2024 04:02

when you have nothing good in your collection except that hype genta "sports" watch ... holy singularity, i guess

Ответить
@dBsdecibels
@dBsdecibels - 24.12.2024 05:30

Guess I've never looked at these as dress watches. Dress watches are generally elegant, and more minimalist in design (especially case). This seems more sports watch to me, especially with that textile + rubber strap. As a sports watch, it's large, but not excessive in size. I know they don't want this to compete with the Oak, but if they gave it a proper screw down crown with 50 to 100m, it would absolutely play the part.

Ответить
@darrenc5563
@darrenc5563 - 24.12.2024 05:31

AP can’t do anything right. They’re the one hit wonder of the watch world.

Ответить
@WarriorChampion47
@WarriorChampion47 - 24.12.2024 13:35

This is an ugly watch. Looks poor designed and not elegant at all

Ответить
@ameeral-shammaa9012
@ameeral-shammaa9012 - 24.12.2024 21:01

Tim, don’t you think this watch is too thick and too wide for a dress watch?

Ответить
@highnrising
@highnrising - 24.12.2024 21:12

At first glance, I thought that bezel was internally rotating. Give it an internally rotating bezel and 100m water resistance, and I'd have no problem with that watch as a dress watch, sports watch or anything in between.

Ответить
@brownhairydog6472
@brownhairydog6472 - 25.12.2024 11:09

Date window at 4 is awful. Typography is awful. Finishing and movement will be great but this just doesn't justify the price 😊

Ответить
@mrsmith8224
@mrsmith8224 - 25.12.2024 18:36

Anything not on a leather or metallic strap , is not a dress watch

Ответить