Комментарии:
I think the design had to take into account that Doom DA is a prequel, so it would have to show a natural evolution (or in this case devolution) in accordance to the timeline.
It seems as though the demons were more badass in the past, and lost a step as time progressed.
Eternal still my fave just because I enjoy the old design. I like TDA one too, but I feel like both are not threatening enough in the new games.
ОтветитьFeel like 2016 doom had a bigger budget, everything look really detailed from stages to monsters or it just me
ОтветитьThe regression of graphics between 2016 and 2020 needs to be studied
Ответитьi want to see a non cyber version of these demons, wonder why we havent seen one before
ОтветитьWhy is the 2016 versions always the best? Tf is wrong with developers
Ответить2016 was peak doom
ОтветитьI kind of wish that TDA made references to the 2016 cyberdemon, but it still an amazing cyberdemon nonetheless
ОтветитьAgreed, out of all the versions, 2016 just gives it the most presence
ОтветитьNone are bad but Eternal and Original design are my fav
Ответитьdoom 2016 🔥🔥🔥
ОтветитьMight be a hot take.. but im not a big fan of 2016s cyberdemon.
I feel like hes interchangeable with like any game. He can be in pretty much any xbox game with monsters in it and no one would say "wait is that a cyberdemon from DOOM?"
captions: heat heat WHAT THE FU- brian griffin
ОтветитьDoom & Doom 2: Hammerhead Snark
Doom 64: Genetically engineered pitbull
Doom 3: Cyberdemon drawn from memory
DOOM: Halo Hunters from hell
Doom Eternal: Runs into walls as a passion
Doom the Dark Ages: Cyber Demon
For me, 64. Simplicity is often more effective. Everyone else just looks like they're trying too hard. Then again, I grew up playing it, so it may be nostalgia talking.
ОтветитьCan someone explain why 2016 looked by far the best with all these models? Tech? Higher rendering? Why?
Ответить2016 had the best designs for demons
Ответитьsolo los del doom 1 3 y et
ОтветитьДум 3 серьезнее всех выглядит)
ОтветитьEither the graphics in 2004 were AMAZING or we haven't really advanced that much since.
ОтветитьFirst one is the best!
ОтветитьDoom 2016's cyberdemon was by far the best boss fight and most genuine fear striking enemy in its time, plus it looks even badass, and with it's gigantic size and cannon, I'd say it's pretty much a win
ОтветитьThe new one looks an overpowered gorgoil
ОтветитьDoom 1&2 best
Ответитьother version of the cyberdemon: minotaur-like demon
2016 version: aggressive kaiju, dino-like demon
We need them to bring back the 2016 design
Ответить2016 was such a great design, I kinda appreciate that he is considered THE Cyberdemon in nuDoom while the enemies from Eternal are called Tyrants.
ОтветитьEternal design is the best
ОтветитьLooks like he was Arnold in his prime, stopped training and is trying to start again.
ОтветитьEternal and dark ages designs are peak-peakier
ОтветитьTDA's cyber demon would go a lot harder if he wasn't such a pushover in combat
ОтветитьLiterally every model in doom 2016 has more details...
ОтветитьOther cyber demons: 😎😈
2016 doom and doom the dark ages cyber demons: 🗿🗿
2016 was such a revival brother
Going from a game series that's last entry was DOOM 3 which played like a horror game to gettin a new game where you run around as the literal embodiment of rage and hatred with the gnarliest video game ost to ever exist goes astronomically hard
It's getting worse and worse each time
ОтветитьThe demons in doom eternal look like plastic mini figures
ОтветитьI hate that they replaced the hooves in the remake.
ОтветитьDoom 2016 has a different species of Cyberdemon. It is a Baalgar demon reconstructed with UAC technology. The Cyberdemons in Doom 1, 2, 3, 64, Eternal, and TDA are all Tyrants with UAC technology. There is debate on whether the Doom 3 Cyberdemon is a Tyrant, but the resemblance is too similar for it not to be the same species. Whether it is a Tyrant or not, the fact remains that it is definitely not a Baalgar.
ОтветитьThe TDA cyberdemon is just too cool. Brutal design, best one since the original.
Ответить2016 consistently looking the best
Ответить2016 consistently looking the best
ОтветитьEternal and 64 are the same...
ОтветитьСамый классный дум 16 и 2го года😂
ОтветитьЭтернал говно
ОтветитьDoes he actually use those wings to fly in the Dark Ages?
ОтветитьWhy does eternal and 1-2 look so similar-
ОтветитьWay to easy to beat in doom dark ages, I usually take him out in 15 seconds
Ответить1+2 = Classic, Formidable enemy.
64 = Creepy. Awesome.
3 = Unexpected Formidable enemy.
2016 = The real formidable enemy!
Eternal = Just minion version, and still...
The Dark Ages = The Cyberlorddemon?
Hey man lacking the spidermastermind
Ответитьwait i thought that was a tyrant
Ответить