Комментарии:
That was a messy lap even for Nelson’s standards.. missed a gear into the chicane and hit curbs a few times. Fighting hard with an engine that most of the mid field guys ran and a terrible chassis from Lotus who had no money for development after paying for two highly rated Brazilian drivers for the last 5 years. Though I think they got better value from their Senna years.
ОтветитьCorria muito Nelsão, olhem só como ele controla a Lotus!
ОтветитьWhere was the 6th gear?
ОтветитьOld F1 was amazing! Viva o Nelson.
ОтветитьGood old days.
Ответить👏👏👏👏👏👏
ОтветитьEsse carro era uma merda. Nessa altura o Nelsão já corria pela grana mesmo.
Ответитьかっこいい。
Ответитьこれが世界一のシフトチェンジか。
ОтветитьQue tratorzão complicado de guiar!
ОтветитьBrasil falta pilotos compesonalidade.
ОтветитьAmazing how much the circuit has grown up in the last 35 years, the skyline is bare in this video.
ОтветитьThe slow days
ОтветитьNota se claramente o Nelsao poupando motor quando ele antecipa as trocas de marchas. Se fosse no limite nao teria nem motor pra corrida
ОтветитьQue pilotagem foda 😃😃😃😃😃😃 O cara não usa a zebra da pista pra nada 👏👏👏👏
Grande Nelson Piquet
Nessa época o piloto tinha que saber passar a marcha na alavanca e virar a curva a mesmo tempo usando uma mão SÓ no volante desgate físico maior necessitando mais agilidade arrojo hoje é SÓ acelerar e apertar botões fora a eletrônica controlando o carro!
ОтветитьAwful construction, this car couldn't do it, it did not look smooth enough to be fast.
ОтветитьNice. Pushing a bit
ОтветитьPiquet in my opinion is the greatest Brazilian driver!
Why ? Because he was pilot, engineer and developer!
This is what F1 should be like. Who would rather watch the current monstrosities over this delight to the senses? Rowing through the gears, feet jumping all over the pedals, slipping and sliding a fire breathing monster. C.mon F1, get your head out of your arses!
ОтветитьNelson Piquet one of the greatest pilot in Formula 1.
ОтветитьWatching these drivers haul these beasts with a manual transmission is a thing of beauty.
ОтветитьBring back the grass!
Ответитьyou are the best nelson; fred.
Ответитьfred from belgium
Ответитьaprer jacky ickx
Ответитьnelson a real master
ОтветитьI have always preferred the camera over the shoulder of the driver than the ones overhead. I think you get a much better drivers view and can appreciate the energy and speed of the car.
ОтветитьNELSNINHO, A LA PAR DE SENNA. eNORME PILOTO.
Ответитьpiquet was a good driver, but also an elitist prick. have you guys read about his feud with senna?
ОтветитьLotus was using the Judd CV V8 with the 5-valve Tickford head around this time.
ОтветитьYo, Y Lotus not so good in '88 n' 89? Same engine as McLaren
ОтветитьWhen racing was real racing...and the drivers were real drivers.
Ответитьwhy did he shake his head at the last corner
ОтветитьI don’t think he was best pleased with that lap.
ОтветитьWhat a year 1989 was 20 teams, 39 drivers. Christ there were as many customer ford V8 teams as the entire 2022 grid.
Ответитьhe is very frustrating at the end wow
ОтветитьWas that the last 5-speed transmission ever used in F1? Or was it rather a weird gearing? 😅
Ответить唐突なオーバーステアに苦労しているようだ
ОтветитьMy favorite F1 driver after Niki Lauda!
ОтветитьWas never a big fan of his, but he really knew how to operate the manual gearbox .
ОтветитьFun fact, Max Verstappen's father, and his girlfriend's father were both team mates with Michael
ОтветитьHoje nem esta sinfonia do motor existe mais, um detalhe carro nervoso ou arisco prefiro falar nervoso, volante simples sem parafernalia para ajudar, e um grande génio pilotando
ОтветитьNelson is a LEGEND! He didn’t like that lap and don’t blame him. That car was crap when he drove for Lotus !
ОтветитьIncredible lap. Master Piquet. And he didn't get satisfied, the car definitely didn't help
ОтветитьWalker Anthony Martinez Ruth Lewis Timothy
ОтветитьPop 84 ❤️
ОтветитьThat day the picket came third. However, the Lotus lost income and he only came sixth, saving one point. In fact, that week, he had announced his trip to Benetton.
Ответить