Комментарии:
WHAT THE F!??😳😲😖😡
ОтветитьAGAIN, THERE WERE NO BENEFITS!
At most, just receiving the poke, might have given the placebo effect on some. If receiving the real placebo - even better!
Not sure if you haven’t sold out or received too many boostere
ОтветитьTHIS IS CRAZY AS HELL!
ОтветитьSo, take a shot that could damage the new donated organs? And or get an organ from someone who did take those shots? Looks to me like there’s no safe option
ОтветитьThe Scumbags that denied this person a life saving treatment may karma come quickly to them. F*ck Them!
Will they accept Unvaccinated Blood? 🇨🇦
The doses were Unregulated in that, how is it measured, how much of the spike protein can be determined to be produced by each individual? It's Not a Vaccine.
ОтветитьIts CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE done by DOCTORS!!! They need to go to JAIL!!!
ОтветитьVACKKKKKKKKKKSFUCKINGSSEEEEEEEEEEENCLOTSSSS
ОтветитьSo you are in the middle huh? Interesting....
ОтветитьBreach of the Nuremberg Code in Canada is like the head and mantle of an octopus. The administration of organ donation in Canada is just one tenacle emanating therefrom.
ОтветитьWell, would it be wise to take an organ from a vaxed person ?
ОтветитьI wouldn't want their contaminated organs. I have no fear of death but i do fear mRNA
ОтветитьYou also can’t get unvaccinated blood. Hospitals are refusing it
ОтветитьNo one should ever be denied and organ transplant if they got the shot or not. You could make a case either way, but this is just sick and the wrong way to do things. Both groups should have equal treatment.
ОтветитьIt is wrong to insist upon a failed jab.
ОтветитьYou will need separate blood and organ donation set up for the unvaxxed. You cannot put a vaxxed organ or vaxxed blood into an unvaxxed person.
ОтветитьI am not surprised, but realize an unvaccinated person wouldn't want an organ transplant from a person who was, as it comes with spiked proteins and permanent damage. Secondly, an unvaxed person wouldn't want to get additional blood from the blood bank due to the loss of blood during the transplant.
ОтветитьDenying transplanta to unvaccinated is another method of nudging people into accepting these vaccines to my opinion.
ОтветитьWell, the unvacinated can refuse to be an organ donor too!
ОтветитьLook.into.the results of people with corneal transplants that had also received the cvd jabs. They have a high level of transplant failures. Why force someone to take a treatment that is going to initiate auto immune situations?
ОтветитьI'm Canadian. My country is broken. I'm unvaccinated and I don't want body parts, blood, etc. from vaccinated donors.
ОтветитьThe whole transplant thing without this questions is controversial.
ОтветитьThere was never a good reason for the jabs.
ОтветитьFYI, replies to your video are being censored so clearly you're stepping on toes - good for you!
ОтветитьWhy are people getting so sick they need new organs?
ОтветитьI would not want a transplant and I will not be an organ donor. Cardiologist Pim van Lommel has done a lot of work on near death experiences and also on patients being alive during organ donation and those who receive an organ changing character afterwards. You can look him up on utube.
ОтветитьThis world is completely mad. Shocking evil is at the wheel. B.t.w. please stop calling it a vaccine as it is not! We all are fully aware of the situation (catastrophic clusterf@ck) we are in right now. There is no up side to it. If not aware, please listen to what Geert has to say about the mess we're in.
ОтветитьWhat happens to those who had bad reactions and are unable to have them? Are we to be left to die? Sounds like what was said when government officials told us we should not be allowed to go to hospital if we got sick. Sounds like the government who told shop keepers they would face huge fines if they allowed the scum unvaccinated to enter. Sounds like those friends and family members who kicked loved ones to the curb if they weren't vaccinated. Is there need to go on!!
ОтветитьWhat if unvaccinatd people designate their organs ONLY go to unvaccinated people?
Would that help the organ transplant industry to understand?
Same-same with blood.
This is Belgium. A patient with lungtransplant got them all in Louvain to bé allowed further control. I looked at thé meaning of génocide but it IS to complicated for an old man
ОтветитьNot sure if someone has commented this, but because most people received the elephant in the rm, organs would be contaminated with spike protein. Hence, that would mean Healthcare facilities and Drs. would be at risk of a lawsuits of giving contaminated organs. Beware!!! Psalms 146:3
ОтветитьGreat work McMillan. A very important question is WHAT WAS AN UNVACCINATED PATIENT?? In the US UK Germany and many other countries a person was considered as unvaccinated who: 1 was vaccinated but less then 14 days ago, 2 a person whose last vaccine was more than 6 months ago, 3 a person who had not could not present proof of vaccination. This has all been well documented therefore it would flawed to rely on this kind of comparison that has been set up to get a required result. When pressed the authorities in Germany, for example, can not give ANY RELIABLE DATA SHOWING ANY BENEFIT OF THE VACCINES. They probably have the data but obviously it refutes their narrative,
ОтветитьI wouldn't want a transplant period, by the time you do get one you are real sick and then taking the rejection drugs the rest of your life and could you get a liver or whatever organ you need from somebody who isn't vaccinated because I didn't take the clot shots for a reason as I never trusted it when the U.S. GOVERNMENT said it was safe and "BLACKMAILED" people to get the shot or they couldn't go back to work!!!!! "USA GOVERNMENT" A CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION SINCE 1776!!!!!!!(dt)
ОтветитьAre you really still there?? What country is still busy with those jabs? What's the point, now that we all know the virus only presents a risk for elderly people and that the jab has many more issues than the virus itself!?
ОтветитьOutrageous
ОтветитьI would rather die than get the jab. Pureblood 100%
ОтветитьI would decline a transplant from a vaccinated person.
ОтветитьRidiculous and evil
ОтветитьOne of my patients used the VA for some of his medical needs. I often shared with him the adverse effects of getting an elephant but he still allowed the VA to give him two elephants so he could have a kidney transplant. Soon after he developed chronic problems with his dialysis shunt clotting. He moved out of my service area so I lost touch with him. A few months later I saw is obituary on the internet.
ОтветитьThis study--organs received are important too. Did the unvaccinated receive kidneys from jabbed people or unjabbed people.
ОтветитьI wouldn't want to receive a jabbed organ. I have it now in my records not to receive blood transfusions.
Ответить“…..that cohort would have benefited from taking that vaccine” (you concluded)
[….in the IMMEDIATE ‘short-term’ viewpoint. But in the longer term ——> CANCER……no!]
Oh Canada. Makes sense.
ОтветитьAustralia does not force the jab to have transplants, but will they give you a transplant from a person that has had the jab is the question, because I am sure there are plenty of those organs around.
ОтветитьWe don't have enough information. They don't want to answer the hard questions, I would never trust them in this conditions...
ОтветитьAnti-rejection drugs are lifelong!??? I did not know that.
ОтветитьWhoever came up with that idea should be investigated…..I can‘t believe this even is up for debate!!!? How is the vax status a criteria to get or not get treatment?!???Totally insane, inhumane! I‘m so angry at people with such a thought!!!
Absolutely off, this kind of attitude, especially from medical professionals! And not to mention the uncertainty of the possible consequences of the newly introduced vax without clear data for vulnerable people like transplant candidates (and general population too. Remember, the mrna vax is not really a vax but gene therapy we had no way of knowing about consequences and it was difficult to measure the benefit of the so called vax in a dynamic, constantly changing state of a pandemic with mutations of the virus and changing interventions etc. It was/is hard to clearly say and measure what‘s benefit of the „vax“ and what‘s the changed state of the situation, virus variant etc.)
The unjabbed are far more likely to get a higher success rate and live a longer life with a transplant than a poked person , as a small amount of research done by people who’s wages don’t depend on following the agenda will reveal
ОтветитьYou could turn this question around and ask: 'Do you want organs from vaccinated people?'.
Ответить