Комментарии:
Great video, but we really need to put to bed the terms "radical innovation" and "sustaining innovation" (sorry CC). Kurzweil's definition of innovation works better: innovation = paradigm shift. From this perspective, we see that innovation is binary and always disruptive, never sustaining. You either changed something on your business model canvas (a good indicator that you've paradigm shifted) or you did not. The word we should use for many things we call "innovation" is really Improvement. Improvement is scalar. You can improve a little bit or a lot. You can radically improve something, but saying that something is a "radical innovation" is like saying something is terrifically terrific. Innovation gurus getting this wrong, imo, has led us into the very tired notion that conflates execution with innovation. Not every innovation comes from the mind of a lone genius, surely, but to say that 'innovation is a team sport' is also not correct. Sometimes it is, and sometimes it isn't. Rather, what is nearly always a team sport for success in business is execution. Hence, most innovation content these days is really about the phase of execution, taking an idea that might have come from one person or a team (or one person standing on the shoulders of many, but not necessarily working together directly) and making it a successful offering. That's awesome. But it isn't really, strictly innovation. Semantics? Maybe. But words matter, and getting our concepts of innovation, improvement, idea, intent, and industrial execution (had to add the 'industrial' there to get the last i-word ) right can help us 'radically improve' how we conceive and build new new things.
Ответитьnot mentioning steve jobs when talking about innovation ( impossible )
ОтветитьI'm captivated by every word. I read a book with similar content, and I was completely captivated. "The Hidden Empire: Inside the Private Worlds of Elite CEOs" by Adam Skylight
ОтветитьThis is absolute perfection. I recently read a similar book, and it was absolute perfection. "The Hidden Empire: Inside the Private Worlds of Elite CEOs" by Adam Skylight
Ответитьwow this is great!
ОтветитьGreat work and so nice
ОтветитьGreatest Piece of Work.
ОтветитьImportant facts
Ответить"Steve Jobs did it, so why can't you"😑
ОтветитьMuito bom. Parabéns pela explicação.
ОтветитьHffhfjjfk
ОтветитьThis presentation was out of this world. It was done really really good!
ОтветитьGenial 🙌🏻
ОтветитьWhere can I find that 55 ways?
Ответитьnice
ОтветитьHSGuniST.Galen why can’t you??? It’s easy to make observation...
ОтветитьI'm late to this party but I'd like to point out all examples given in this video were of terribly scummy business practices done by those companies and I'd hope people wouldn't take example from them
Ответитьreally good job done . thumbs up!
ОтветитьReally exemplified innovation in content, style and delivery. This is great
ОтветитьI was looking for this! :)
Ответитьthe best video!! a pleasure to watch ahah
ОтветитьI missed every bit of information when the girl showed up
Ответитьwell prepared video. I own the book "business model navigator". you make this book alive. keep up the good work
Ответитьamazing video learnt so much in such a short amount of time. Thanks guys.
ОтветитьI liked this video. Inspired me to create one on 'Reinventing Business Models" - a sheer necessity during COVID times.
ОтветитьWhat are some examples of incorrect management behaviors that causes failed change initiatives?
Ответитьtop video, complex staff easily explained in few minutes.
ОтветитьBut analogies are bad?
ОтветитьWhere did you provide the study of 55 models to learn from?! 🤔
ОтветитьThe best video i have ever seen. Thanks!
ОтветитьIt's a shame you have to use a girl to explain everything in such a stupid way... I wonder if you would use a man to do the same and a female voice to explain, instead. It's just embarrasing and painful. Which century are you stucked in?
Ответитьall good and great study. Sometimes just doing your current business right is enough for success...
ОтветитьI don't know why such a good quality education material, should have a loud music on the background, which makes following the presentation difficult... Why not make it quite so we can focus
ОтветитьNice, but what & where the 55 innovation ?
ОтветитьGreat video
let me help you for Arabic translation
The business model framework that I know of has the key question "Why" in the middle". I find it much more relevant actually. Anything that is done without the human element of the creator, the meaning one puts behind creating a business model is only partial. The other questions remain, of course. 1.Why? 2. Who? 3. What (a) do I offer, b) is my value proposition)? and 4. How?... What'do you think?
ОтветитьGreat summary, was fun to watch and made so much more sense than lecture slides. Thanks!
ОтветитьOne of the greatest contents I have ever seen.
Thank you for the video!
It’s one of the most wonderful video I have seen about innovation. Thank you so much for sharing
ОтветитьWhat a shitty interpretation of company failures. The main reason of Kodak failure not the luck of innovation. They invented digital cameras.The reason of their failure was the pressure of investors demands for quarterly profits and unclear future. How many days CEO of the successful public company would stay on his position after he tells that he is going to disrupt existing growing business for some uncertain future? These business school theorists are trying to package into their nice business case reality which is not always conform to their theory. Kodak was in the digital cameras market. And had the same chances to survive as Olympus. But rigid structure, slow and unresponsive company management didn't allow them to create a products customer want's at the speed customer want's. And note that Kodak demise happened before smartphone cameras have taken market.The IBM, Kodak, Xerox, Motorola, Nortel, Nokia were all times innovators with more patents granted then most of their competitors combined. What they luck this is speed in implementation, empathy to the customers needs and the most important courage to make a serious bets against stable future.This is rarely possible in public company without majority stakeholder who would support such plan. Michael Dell should make company private to pursue his vision. HP at the same time is on the road to irrelevance, because they are listening to the MBA accountants who favor short-term quarterly profits in favor of company future.
ОтветитьThis video is so disturbing, Frames are changing so quickly. You are trying to do too much.
ОтветитьThe woman is beatiful ..
Ответить·
What are the major issues and innovation
concepts presented in the documentary?
what are the main summery of this video?
ОтветитьThank you for this 💕
ОтветитьJ'adore ce vidéo! Il est juste...Parfait!!
Ответитьa pitty this girl almost certainly left st gallen...
ОтветитьWhy all these videos should have background music at all!?
Ответить