Комментарии:
Man that golden hour footage is incredible bro.I love the way you dont over hype and stay real even tho your a dealer and love the wing.Cant stand that bs.
ОтветитьFun watch, love all the flight footage!
ОтветитьGreat job man... bravoo
ОтветитьSweet! I was able to fly my ViperXC back-to-back with a Viper6 of the same size. I noticed the kiting and efficiency changes, but they totally felt the same in the air with regard to roll rate and playfulness.
ОтветитьWatched this twice! First: listening intently to your detailed review, Second: muted the voiceover and jammed some great flying tunes! Thanks for taking us along Trevor! I hope everything is going well for you and the crew at Backcountry. Cheers!
ОтветитьGreat place to fly!!
Ответить@Trevor Steele - what about different rizers?
ОтветитьWhat size did you get your vipersix
ОтветитьNow that you have flown so many new wings and different wings it wld be awesome literally awesome if you would revisit the dominator wings and give is a no nonsense fair review. The pros and cons. .... You will get 50 thousand views
ОтветитьLove this wing, nice review. I am curious about longevity, but I fly in the midwest which is pretty easy on the fabric.
ОтветитьIt's actually designed for classic competitions and endurance comps not just xc. And there's nothing European about competitive XC. See all the massive flights from all over the world including Australia and Latin America.
ОтветитьCan you do a comparison against the Falcon 2, how they differ, class comparison, speed, RPM, etc. ?
ОтветитьIm not entirely convinced that the ultra lightweight fabric is an ideal scenario for me personally. And I don't think you're being intentionally misleading but to call the Viper XC a "heavy /heavier weight fabric" is only even close to factual in comparing it to the Viper 6 because it's already lighter weight fabric than every other wing in it's class. The Warp 2 is between 40g/m² and 34g/m² fabric. The Falcon 2 is using 40-32 fabric. The Apco F1 is using 42-27 and yet the XC is using 30g/m² and 20g/m² fabric. It's lightweight fabric for sure! And then you look at the 6 and it's using 20g/m² and 10g/m²!!!!!
The fabric being that lightweight concerns me on stresses at structural connection points, it concerns me on longevity of the fabric and it can not be as strong as a fabric 2-4x it's density.
Not saying it's unsafe to fly but it has a lower margin of safety that I'm not sure I'm comfortable with. Now that being said I'm not an engineer and I don't work in textiles or fabric development and production but I'm expressing my opinions and thoughts on this and giving the reason I personally won't buy one. No knock on you or anyone that chooses to fly them. However that is an opinion coming from a pilot flying at Sea Level so....