Комментарии:
Oo
WOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOW
Should be separate categories for ai and non ai , I doubt he could compete with a regular digital artist if he didn’t have ai
ОтветитьPeople feel comfortable to hang on to the old ways doing things. Hope some of the resistance to the amazing progress won’t last long.
ОтветитьAljazeera shows it took im 80hrs 🤔
ОтветитьBetter than a plain blue canvas. Period.
ОтветитьReally disingenious of the "artist" to illustrate an image of him spending 800 hours coming up with the final result. The AI they used is called Midjourney AI, I paid for it 2 months ago to give it a try. While it is very interesting to play with, all you are doing is typing prompts into it and then rearranging or tweaking your words, clicking variation results to push it further, or redoing the generation altogether. If they took that AI result and painted it over, it would've been a different story, there's lots of artists already using this to paint over the final results and push it further. But all they did was pay $10-$30 for the month, type some words, probably spent a few hours clicking a button to regenerate it, and then called it a day.
ОтветитьThe dude took about 800 hours to get the piece he submitted, he did try there was effort, there was skill. The AI didn't do everything
ОтветитьHe has no skill as an actual artist.
Look up the programs people.
This guys not an artist. I was in that category I could’ve done the same thing. But I’m not a fake. The fact that he sits and takes credit away from REAL artist is just an insult towards The artists who have dedicate their lives to the arts.
ОтветитьCompetition sponsored by elon musk
ОтветитьLol a computer is an art tool, they are used to aid in many creative works, including the fancy graphics of your news program.
ОтветитьFuck this guy, him entering an art contest with an A.I it's like entering a Boxing match with a gun, there's no point anymore to try cause the gun will win and just ruins it for everyone
ОтветитьMake it a seperare category. There's no way a digital artist can compete with the work of a computer and a vision. AI was a tool yeah, but anyone with common sense knows its going to do most the work lol
ОтветитьHonestly, this would work better at a science fair.
ОтветитьI actually want to get a copy and enlarge it on canvas like he displayed it. It is a beautiful pice any way you cut it.
ОтветитьArtist: AI can't be as creative as artist so they can't replace us
Also Artist when AI won: AI Art should not be on the same category!
He is much of an artist as I am Gordon Ramsay for ordering a burger from Gordon Ramsay. The AI done the work.
ОтветитьI hate this.
ОтветитьWild times 😅
ОтветитьThere are people who say AI art isn’t real art and there are some people who don’t understand what art is and they’re the same people. I’ve looked at AI art and felt emotionally moved by it quod erat demonstrandum: AI art IS art whether you like it or not. 😊
ОтветитьDiscrimination, inclusion, what is it now?... a separate category for AI??? 🤣🤣🤣 a work of art is a work of art... time for humans to start stepping down! It´s evolution baby!!!... soon enough, there´ll be an exclusive line for humans... a special line for inferior, fleshy, stinky, envious, etc.. etc...etc beings paying for their groceries 👹
ОтветитьSo humans have stoop so low to be competing with machines?
Comparing natural human ability with machine is degrading.
No machines without humans, machine should compete with other machines.
I call this the new avant-garde movement "Artilectualism." I've reached a point where I am no longer calling this art,
I call them "A.I. Completions" or A.I.C's for short. If this isn't artwork, and I'm not an artist, then art is dead, and A.I.C's are better than art!
Well where are all the artists saying that AI can't beat humans?
ОтветитьAI gave a pretty arrogant and scary answer to the question it was asked if u pause n read it all.
ОтветитьHonestly this is bullshit. This isn’t art at all. Art requires an artist.
ОтветитьA.I. will REPLACE humans in every field just given enough time and that time could be months weeks days or even minutes but NOT years
ОтветитьThey can win all chess games, too.
ОтветитьHe spent a lot of time and effort to get it to look that good. He directed the AI by prompts and he wanted it to look a certain way. It's an amazingly beautiful piece.
ОтветитьAll the more reason to avoid art competitions as a whole. First major companies scam artists from their submissions.....now people like this guy are appearing.
Don't join an art contest.
This is the same thing when photography was invited artists freaked out.
ОтветитьIf art isn’t safe then what is?
ОтветитьHe is definetly NOT an artist. I have used Midjournet and it's f*&ng easy.
ОтветитьJason Allen, you are not an artist. You don't know how to draw.
Different with music, physical music instrument vs digital music instrument. People still need to learn chords, beats and many more.
In art illustration community, using AI is simple af. Even 4 years old can be artist(if you consider AI is an artist which is lame). Just typing and typing, no need to learn colour theory, perspective and so on.
"AI is a tool, like a paintbrush is a tool".....
Hold up, no, there is a DIFFERENCE. A paintbrush, you actually can stroke, dip and shade. AI, all you do is sit your lazy ass down and type in words. Now, which one is more work? Gee, I wonder.....exactly, fuck you. Call yourself an author for letting AI write a terrible story, call yourself a chef if you work at McDonalds....it takes time to craft your skills. If you can't do it, you don't earn it.
I think it’s clearly art, but I also think it’s pretty unreasonable to allow in an art competition.
ОтветитьOne way or another, this art will be remain historical
ОтветитьIt's not complicated, just don't let people who use AI for art into a competition.
Ответитьif you are not making the art yourself you are not an artist
ОтветитьWelp it’s art now since it conveyed emotions to a human and created discussion around the piece itself
Ответитьhow does that garbage take third
Ответитьthe world of painting will be less exciting with out the frailties of human hands.
ОтветитьIf I am an art editor at a magazine and my artists give me submissions, then I tell them to make changes, once those changes are made I do not get to claim the art as my own. This doesn't change no matter how many adjustments are made or how long it takes. That art was created by Midjourney and edited by him. He is not the artist.
ОтветитьIf you check art books for scifi works you'll see pieces like this.
You're all forgetting one crucial fact about the AI art you worship
It only gets these pieces by coping from a variety of other artworks on the Internet. If humans were to cease creating art, there would be no more references to go by so AI would stay creating the same repetitive results over and over again until a new piece of artwork shows up. AI art was a good tool when you are an artist and you have an idea, you draw it and feel something missing so you tweak it to find a missing piece but humans do not look at someone's art copy the art style and then change the hair bc when we do that, it results in a mass amount of ppl calling you a tracer or copier smh
Ai is supposed to mean ‘artificial intelligence’
Now it just stands for ‘Actual Inattentivness’
I wonder what the prompt for that painting was...🤔
ОтветитьThe older generation knows the answer to this question, the younger generation does not. - Pappy
ОтветитьIn the words of Jeff Goldblum: you never stopped to ask should we do it. - Pappy
Ответить