Комментарии:
…by the Lady of the Lake 🎉
ОтветитьI only accept Excalibur as EKUSUCARIBAAAAAAAAAA sorry
ОтветитьI really enjoy his videos. Wasn't that their calvary sword? I know it was modeled after a Spanish or swords that were in what would be Spain. The Gladius was too short for use from horse back. Their shields were smaller than the Skutum and oval. But still used a center boss.
ОтветитьOh, what sad times are these when passing ruffians can challenge traditional film representations of medieval swords at will. There is a pestilence upon this land. Nothing is sacred. Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
ОтветитьExalibour era la Spada di Giulio Cesare
ОтветитьTHIS IS SPATHA!
ОтветитьThis is the Spatha.
ОтветитьLooks like Romans had the market for weapons.
ОтветитьThat is assuming we're setting our King Arthur in a bog-standard medieval Europe with no magic. Depending on which version, Excalibur was supposedly forged by fae smiths in Avalon, so in that instance, it seems a bit lazy to just make excalibur a plane old historical sword.
ОтветитьSo cool content, thank you❤
Please, put more subscribes that it was for foreign guys easier to understand all information which you're sharing))
Is there a specific reason not to give it more of a handguard? I know you say the shield would be used for that but it still seems worth having surely?
ОтветитьI don't think it would have been an ordinary sword. Perhaps a bit like a fancy ring sword.
ОтветитьMay I hold it? I’ll give it back - I promise
ОтветитьThe Virgin Arthur vs The Chad Alfred
ОтветитьIt can fire lasers. Saw it in a Japanese documentary
ОтветитьIm thinking 6th or 7th century Glouchester, probably a Mayor of some sort.
ОтветитьSo a medium sword in other words.
ОтветитьHistory: accurate
Goth Vibe: rejected
He who pulls the sword from the stone - Excalibur was a bronze sword by that reckoning.
ОтветитьThe sword in the stone points to casting not forging.
ОтветитьThank you sir but the king Author thing is a bit over the top
ОтветитьFamously, the Roman-British spatha was worn in a back scabbard and dual wielded in a style that involved a lot of spinning. Very often, the Romano-British warrior would lock swords with his opponent and deliver quite a long monologue before pushing them away and continuing the fight. The Romano-British spatha was capable of delivering large numbers of wounds that were just enough to make the wounded party wince but carry on fighting. However, the final killing blow against a low-status opponent was a reverse grip slash across the belly that killed instantaneously, and the final killing blow against a high status opponent was always a thrust tat impaled them and gave them just long enough to realise they had been defeated before they died with a gurgle, but never a scream.
ОтветитьAlways liked how Hellboy showed Excalibur as a spatha
ОтветитьI need a back up for m4
ОтветитьWhy don’t Roman swords have crossguards?
Does it just not suit their fighting style, especially since very few of their enemies would’ve had swords of their own?
It’s really nice to see you on shorts. I used to watch your channel all the time and the algorithm just moved me on after a while. Now I’m suddenly binging these after they popped up and it’s great to be back.
ОтветитьA lindybeige short is a fresh cup of tea being handed to you. Lovely.
ОтветитьExcalibur was a Roman Sword 🗡️
ОтветитьThe Spartha looks similar to the viking style swords. Makes sense.
ОтветитьThe Spatha followed the gladius morphing from the sword used by cavalry
ОтветитьBut can the pommel be unscrewed?
Ответитьhaha but King Arthur supposedly pulled it out of a stone which has been there for a while, so, I guess it could've been a bronze sword?
Ответитьthe portuguese word for sword is "espada", very similar to "spatha" dont you think?
ОтветитьIf there was no King Arthur then why the FUCK does he have a grave site and why was it EMPTIED 500 years ago?
ОтветитьI like the idea that Excalibur wasn’t a spatha or a gladius, but the first of the more Merovingian or Vendel swords of the early 5th century. Everyone else using iron gladius or spatha vs Arthur using a well made steel sword just seems appealing to me. 😅
ОтветитьCareful, careful with that.
ОтветитьFor a second at the start I thought he had an elder scroll 📜 I was shouting don’t open it 😂 you will fry your brain
ОтветитьWhere did you get that fine sword sir?
ОтветитьYes 😊its pretty! I would be tripping over something that big.
ОтветитьExactly 🏴
ОтветитьCloser to the Excalibur in 2004’s King Arthur
ОтветитьBastard?
ОтветитьThis sword doesn't have a handguard. Not good.
ОтветитьCompletely wrong. The spatha was a longer heavy cavalry sword, not the shorter gladius, a slashing light infantry sword used with a shield.
ОтветитьI've seen it. It's got a blue and gold handle and the woman who owns it screams "Ekusu-calibaaaa!"
ОтветитьI found some 6th centry blades from england that look more mystical in nature vs the average sword.
ОтветитьThe Spatha was originally a Roman cavalry sword and it was not 3 feet. More like under 30 inches: 28, 29 inches
ОтветитьI expect some Welshman have one under the bed.
Ответить::)
ОтветитьOr using it from a horseback like a chief or general would have... or if you're a medieval chronicler writing this down, a king or knight.
Ответить