Комментарии:
Pretty sure it was a pr thing. German took heat cause the flamethrowers and gas stuff like that so they turned around and said look at what the Americans are using see it’s inhumane. I don’t think they were kicking ass in the trenches like everyone things they were these days. Forgotten weapons had a really interesting video on this or maybe c&rsenal also.
ОтветитьThe guns were kicking their asses and they were losing the war, sour grapes, end of story!
ОтветитьIf only they had cluster bombs back then too.
ОтветитьDidn't the Germans use sawtooth bayonets, which were explicitly designed to cause as much pain and suffering as possible by pulling out the guts of anyone it was stuck into?
Not to mention the gas, flamethrowers, U-boats, etc.
Wee bit hypocritical to complain about shotguns with that in mind.
I think this might be a misconception. The Germans were being called out on so many war crimes they likely just wanted to throw some accusations back at the allies
ОтветитьA holes are dropping chemical weapons which killed slowly and a shotgun is inhumane lol
ОтветитьGermany wanted to ban it because they didn’t have one. Simple
ОтветитьAn extra thing you didn't need to know. I will disprove the Devil's Tower tree theory.
If it was a tree, it would have reached into the troposphere. The troposphere is about 10 km (6.2 miles or about 33,000 feet) above sea level. According to a team of Georgian (state not country) biologists, the maximum height of a tree lies somewhere between 400 and 426 feet (122 and 130 m).
WTF, war means killing. Go Yank.
ОтветитьThe Germans protesting about a shotgun and using seren gas to CHOKE THE LIFE OUT OF TROOPS?...no wonder they lost BOTH WWI and WWII 😂
ОтветитьEven if arguably, yes the shotgun does seem a little bit excessive and it might have been 😅
Germany, certainly don't have a leg to stand on when it comes to complaining, considering all the questionable stuff they did.
You forgot flamethrowers. Yeah, the Jerrys came up with those too.
ОтветитьPeople are always protesting about something with U.S. lethality: Shotguns, flame throwers, drones, water boarding, combined arms, etc. 😂 Why do you people always try to fight the Americans and then complain?
ОтветитьI find it hilarious with the hypocrisy of the Germans they're fine using chemical weapons, but when we bring in the shotguns then they start bitching
ОтветитьI'm german and to be clear: no, my ancestors were not right.
ОтветитьGermans were the first to use chemical warfare ever. They used it in WWI first. Fritz Haber, a highly respected Nobel Prize winning chemist came up with the idea of using Chlorine gas against enemy troops, and was present when it was first used. This so upset his wife that shortly after the first use of gas, she committed suicide.
ОтветитьGermans "were using toxic gases on you"
German soldiers "FUCK ITS COMING BACK AT US"
"FUCK ITS ON THE OTHER SIDE TOO"
Canadians "nah second ones us"
Germans "NO FAIR"
If it was the Germans using the shotgun they would not have a problem with it
Ответитьcanadians enter chat......
ОтветитьLet's see shotgun vs mustard gas or chlorine gas.. this is one time Germany shouldn't have said anything lol
ОтветитьThe Germans of that era don’t have much of a leg to stand on.
ОтветитьWhy exactly did the Germans complain and then goto the Hague? What was the reason they were against this shotgun?
This video is junk. Raises more questions about the creator. Lazy.
You could protest hand grenades and shrapnel for the same reasons. The shotgun is at least directed.
ОтветитьThe didn’t like it because they didn’t make it first
ОтветитьWe’re talking about the same Germans, right?
ОтветитьThe Army also stated that if even a single American POW was executed for using a shotgun, than the US would make sure no German POW left internment alive.
ОтветитьThe germans during world war one were hypocrites
ОтветитьNo
Ответить"let us have some fun,man!"
ОтветитьThe German's hate for shotguns resulted in them being banned from many things...
ОтветитьShotgun is too harsh, Germans to Americans. Americans to Germans, oh yea? So tell us more about this mustard gas...
ОтветитьCan shotguns produce unnecessary suffering? Yes
But gas atacks too
So...
Germans:
Flammenwerfer
Grenades
Mustard gas
Land mines
Ja-ok
Shotguns
Nein nein nein
The nerve of complaining about a shotgun while torturing millions of people to death in camps
ОтветитьUmm that was the Germans just trying anything they could to get the upper hand advantage over Americans by trying to ban the shotgun. The gasses they jsed was more cruel and inhumane then a shotgun ever was cause you suffocated and suffered for a few mins or even a hour if you got lut and die a hour later from burnt lungs and throat from breathing in a small amoubt of gas. The gas should have been banned not shotgun. Id rather had my head blown off by a buckshot then suffocating on gas and dieing slow painful death or get out of the gassed trench knowing your gonna die anyways from the gas but you are also trying to dodge bullets coming at you and know you might get shot and your dead either way.
ОтветитьIt was used to kill messenger pigeons as well
ОтветитьHow you going to cry in war
ОтветитьAnd look at the atrasties they did.
ОтветитьSo shotguns are bad but a flame thrower that shoots up to 30 feet wasn't 😂
ОтветитьFRANC WAS THE FIRST TO USE GAS IN WARFARE
ОтветитьHonestly, why would anyone care what Germany thinks on the madder of shotguns? They are historically famous for war crimes during the world wars.
ОтветитьGermany during ww1: SHOTGUNS ARE A WAR CRIME!
Also germany during ww1: flamethrowers and gas weapons are perfectly fine
Mustard gas & flame throwers to germans wasn't inhumane but a shotgun was a war crime?
ОтветитьSeems like sore losers
ОтветитьI like how there were b42 in ww1 😂😂😂
Ответить"oh my god germany you cant be speaking you have poison gas, bombing and flamethowers"
Also the allies copies the ideas and sues it themselves
The German objection was related to the extreme difficulty, pre-antibiotics to dress the wounds of a soldier hit by multiple pellets. It is general principle to this day, that weapons which by design cause a massive difficulty in medical treatment are not permitted. They were quite right to reject the German complaint, as poison-gas and unrestricted uboat warfare did rather give the lie to the Germans having an ethical leg to stand on!
ОтветитьNo it didn't violate the convention.
It was effective in the trenches where long gun were hard to handle.
That lead to a lot of clubbing with rifles.
Causing types of wounds that lead to a lifetime of pain and misery .
Poison gas is ok, lol says the idiots who could get away from trench warfare and accomplished nothing
ОтветитьI think Germans at that time would be the last to protest about weapons of war.
Ответить