Dahir and his Dynasty | Sindh before the Arabs

Dahir and his Dynasty | Sindh before the Arabs

Jay Vardhan Singh

8 месяцев назад

12,708 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@radhamadhabpathi512
@radhamadhabpathi512 - 20.04.2024 15:49

Very informative video

Ответить
@ABHAY_DEV_ARYA
@ABHAY_DEV_ARYA - 20.04.2024 15:58

❤❤❤

Ответить
@magma9000
@magma9000 - 20.04.2024 15:59

Love from Karachi 🇵🇰♥️

Ответить
@Fire-zg7nx
@Fire-zg7nx - 20.04.2024 16:30

Thanks

Ответить
@Unfollowthem
@Unfollowthem - 20.04.2024 16:38

First Loss of Akhanda Bharata matru Bhoomi😢😢😢

Ответить
@Worldcitizen7777
@Worldcitizen7777 - 20.04.2024 16:55

Please make a video on Lalitaditya Muktipida and his conquest

Ответить
@raginisingh2251
@raginisingh2251 - 20.04.2024 17:05

V. Informative video

Ответить
@ujjwalkumarray4786
@ujjwalkumarray4786 - 20.04.2024 17:49

Made video on pashtun religion before Islam, Shahi Kingdom, zorastrianism animism paganism amog pakhtun.

Ответить
@tajendersharma1539
@tajendersharma1539 - 20.04.2024 18:07

हिन्दू राजाओं के विरुद्ध दुष्प्रचार और उनका चरित्र हनन करने का ग्रन्थ चचनामा

Ответить
@PawanRao007
@PawanRao007 - 20.04.2024 18:14

Great video chotte bhai ❤.

Ответить
@wickeddemon8799
@wickeddemon8799 - 20.04.2024 18:43

Buddhists betrayed Raja dahir and helped Arabs to defeat him

Ответить
@chotadon967
@chotadon967 - 20.04.2024 18:46

What about ….zala Makwana of makwan today known as makran…who will talk about…mehr of mehrgardh(Baluchistan)… samma prince Chandrachud-Samma was nephew of vala(maitraka) of wanthli given jagir by his nana later established “ Chudasama “ dynasty history student of Delhi should go to that place to know true history!!! We all know that RAI is title not a family name!! Even after 75 year still wahi leftist brahmano ki kahania batayi jarhi hai…..

Ответить
@greatkaafir7478
@greatkaafir7478 - 20.04.2024 19:18

Great Rai Rajput's Of Sindh |🙏🚩

Ответить
@srikantamahananda1603
@srikantamahananda1603 - 20.04.2024 19:53

7th century me Iran me muslim caliphate Jeet hone k baad jo muslimo dwara dharmik utpeedan hue Zoroastrians Pujari varg [Magi] bharat ki or aaye aur Sindh Punjab me bas gye aur khudko brahmin banaya chhachhundaron ne

Ответить
@samratsworld6719
@samratsworld6719 - 20.04.2024 21:07

Please make a video on Bappa Rawal, Nagbhatt and Lalitaditya of Kashmir.

Ответить
@sohailsindhi3335
@sohailsindhi3335 - 20.04.2024 21:17

Love from Sindh❤

Ответить
@akk7791
@akk7791 - 20.04.2024 21:17

Nice

Ответить
@champion1928
@champion1928 - 20.04.2024 21:24

What's about battle of Kaikan (Jat's vs Arabs), The Arab conquest of Kaikan (alternatively Kikan, Kiknan, Qaiqan or Qayqan) was a military campaign by the Rashidun and Umayyad Caliphates aganist the Jats of Kaikan, in present-day Pakistan.The Kingdom of Kaikan faced several invasions from the caliphate. During the reign of the Khalifa Al-Mutasim, the Arabs annexed this region successfully after defeating the Jats.

The fourth Caliph Ali sent the second expedition to Sindh under Harith ibn Murrah al-Abdi in 660 (according to Al-Baladhuri). However, the Chach Nama states Saghar bin Zuar had been appointed, not Harith.

After a successful raid in Sindh in 662, Harith turned his attention to Kaikan. Harith had outfitted a formidable Muslim army with nobles and chiefs. This army encountered no real opposition till it reached the treacherous terrain of Kaikan. The Jats fought against the Arab army and managed to defeat it Harith along with his followers was killed in this battle in the year 42 AH (662 AD).This was a huge blow for the Caliph, and so, for the next twenty years, every successive Caliph made Kaikan a special target for conquest and sent as many as six expeditions, five of which failed to make any permanent impact in Sindh.

Ответить
@sohailsindhi3335
@sohailsindhi3335 - 20.04.2024 21:27

You are doing good but chachnama is not true source of our history it was written by Arabs and Persian Ali kuffi translated it.. And we know how our Muslim invaders always razed the history of native heros..

Ответить
@Shahanshah.Shahin
@Shahanshah.Shahin - 20.04.2024 21:36

After the death of Kavadh II, the Sasanian Empire was in great chaos. A civil war was brewing between the ruling house of Sasan and the 7 other royal houses of Iran of Parthian clans. During this time, a daughter of Khosrow II Parvez named "Boran" was crowned the Bānbishnān Bānbishn ī Eran ud Aneran (Queen of Queens of Iranians and non-Iranians).

Ответить
@007Parmar
@007Parmar - 20.04.2024 21:39

History tells loudly that Rajputs have always been deceived by brahmins.

Ответить
@lakhshyalakey8078
@lakhshyalakey8078 - 20.04.2024 21:55

Great work man, keep it up

Ответить
@Koorush_bazurg
@Koorush_bazurg - 20.04.2024 23:41

Please make video on history of Punjab

Ответить
@lokeshgsadhmaya5499
@lokeshgsadhmaya5499 - 21.04.2024 02:08

Well done brother.
M impressed 💯
M history buff so, humble request to be brutally honest 👍
Keep growing brother

Ответить
@venkataraghotham7586
@venkataraghotham7586 - 21.04.2024 08:54

Once again a good account

Ответить
@odilbekb-sarkaev1052
@odilbekb-sarkaev1052 - 21.04.2024 12:34

Chach=Tashkent

Ответить
@kandarppatel5810
@kandarppatel5810 - 21.04.2024 14:05

In future video if possible please show what was the life of sindhi people and what sindhi society looked like because I’m sure my sindhi brothers won’t know about it.

Ответить
@zainabk9165
@zainabk9165 - 21.04.2024 14:16

Do not discuss fantasy dear

Ответить
@mandarayachit9788
@mandarayachit9788 - 21.04.2024 15:27

This is awesome and need to contact.

Ответить
@googleuser4534
@googleuser4534 - 21.04.2024 17:05

Tell us something about Ancient Maharashtra .

Ответить
@googleuser4534
@googleuser4534 - 21.04.2024 17:28

क्या चच के पिता का नाम सिलाईज था ? चच और सिलाईज ऐसे नाम भारत के किस प्रांत में रखे जाते है ? भारत के किसी भी ब्राह्मण समाज में ऐसे नाम नहीं पाये जाते है , इसका मतलब चच भारत का ब्राह्मण नहीं था ।

Ответить
@dvikauglaumishrauca
@dvikauglaumishrauca - 21.04.2024 20:47

Bhaiya gujartio ka etymology kuch milta hai?? Especially Patels who came to charotar(anand nadiad) land ~15 generations back?

Ответить
@cjauria
@cjauria - 21.04.2024 22:31

Precious information and exceptional presentation.

Ответить
@tomcat4321
@tomcat4321 - 22.04.2024 03:26

Arabs needed an excuse to invade Sindh. It’s easier to invade if the native rulers are portrayed as savages.
Dagir marrying his half sister is an aberration. But Arabs and Muslims to this day marry their 1st andv2nd cousins and it is lawful for them to do that.😂

Ответить
@gangadharhiremath7306
@gangadharhiremath7306 - 22.04.2024 08:41

I love your heavy north Indian accent and narrative style.Also,it appears,you do not belong either to the Hindutwa gang of untruthful half historians or the ideoloy driven leftist historians.

Ответить
@rashidmohannadi8340
@rashidmohannadi8340 - 23.04.2024 16:59

chach isn’t a person’s name rather it’s the corruption of the word janjua so they’re janjua rajputs

Ответить
@faheemshah576
@faheemshah576 - 23.04.2024 19:34

Very impressive good work i am from aror Sindh

Ответить
@teri_maut_
@teri_maut_ - 25.04.2024 14:34

Can anyone suggest some basic history books to study bharatiya itihasa (non-marxist).

Ответить
@PranavGogwekar
@PranavGogwekar - 26.04.2024 11:13

I can't understand why no Indian account of this dynasty survived. Why aren't there many Indian chronicles, or why they haven't survived? It would be wrong to blame invasions as many texts have survived through duplications.

Ответить
@PranavGogwekar
@PranavGogwekar - 26.04.2024 11:17

Chandar must be Chandra in indian pronunciation. I don't understand what could be Dahir. Could Chach be Kach(like the gupta king)?

Ответить
@eden55272
@eden55272 - 08.05.2024 09:07

Arabs also conquered Gujarat and Rajasthan but they lost gujrat , rajashthan during Umayyad abbasid civil war

Ответить
@dragosbecheru839
@dragosbecheru839 - 16.05.2024 09:25

As a European historian, I have to say that almost none of what you present to us so eloquently was ever taught, nor accessible. India truly is fascinating. Thank you for your work to get these historical aspects to less knowledgeable people! Keep up the great work!

Ответить
@parjanyashukla176
@parjanyashukla176 - 27.05.2024 08:49

This story sounds extremely strange and stupid. Brahmin minister having a name "Chach" (it doesn't sound close to anything in Sanskrit) seducing a Rajput queen? 😂

Ответить
@hashermohammed
@hashermohammed - 10.06.2024 10:24

I am from Kerala. Here arabs didn't conquer land. However there was deep Arab trade in the past n present. I myself have an ancestral past of the Arab - Brahmin marriage alliance . Maybe I will return to more Bharat culture n name

Ответить
@gangadharhiremath7306
@gangadharhiremath7306 - 18.08.2024 11:39

You are following a traditional pattern of history telling where the history of ruling dynasty becomes the history of that land.what about its ppl,their culture religion and economic activity?Britishers created rift btn communities and regions by writing such superficial history.
Hope you will try to dig a little deeper.

Ответить
@darshansinghmehrok2122
@darshansinghmehrok2122 - 13.12.2024 08:23

King Dahir bhi kamboj king the ,king Harashvaradhan kamboj king of mahabharta vale ke vansaj sabit hue hai .

Ответить
@darshansinghmehrok2122
@darshansinghmehrok2122 - 22.12.2024 03:33

Hindi nahi aati kya.Apni maa ko lat mar kar dusre ki maa ki puja karte ho angrej ki aulad

Ответить