Understanding the Grand Tack Hypothesis | How the Universe Works | Science Channel

Understanding the Grand Tack Hypothesis | How the Universe Works | Science Channel

Science Channel

5 месяцев назад

43,064 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@Boogieplex
@Boogieplex - 16.02.2025 05:13

It’s actually quite frustrating that we live in such a unique time, where we are so close to unlocking so many secrets the universe holds. Too bad it’ll be another 100 years before anything big gets revealed. Dammit!

Ответить
@sethpaul7447
@sethpaul7447 - 14.02.2025 13:57

Sounds like mike rowe

Ответить
@nicksundstrom7341
@nicksundstrom7341 - 24.01.2025 08:17

So Jupiter and Saturn had some celestial battles…I’ve heard that story somewhere before 🤔

Ответить
@marcp1880
@marcp1880 - 21.01.2025 20:39

The milky ways spiral arms were created by a collision of two ring galaxies

Ответить
@JimKrause1975
@JimKrause1975 - 19.01.2025 07:51

I believe it! When you look at our solar system, the asteroid belt for example, I believe Jupiter was on it's way to being a hot jupiter!

Ответить
@jimmurphy6095
@jimmurphy6095 - 20.11.2024 06:21

Good stuff... Thanks for this.

Ответить
@badpiggies988
@badpiggies988 - 15.11.2024 07:14

No wonder our Earth is so tiny compared to these colossal ocean planets we keep finding around other Sol-like stars

Ответить
@WEAREUPKING
@WEAREUPKING - 06.11.2024 10:30

me universe won world only yes

Ответить
@Useeree1527
@Useeree1527 - 11.10.2024 21:37

Thank you allah ❤

Ответить
@alex-freeman-CFH-817
@alex-freeman-CFH-817 - 09.10.2024 02:35

It does make sense that the gas giants closer to their respective stars would indeed be hotter than our gas giants that are much further from our star. And of course these planets have lots of gravitational pull that's why our gas giants have so many moons. So logically two things with large gravitational pull I.E. a star and large gas giants close to each other would have more planets closer to them, at least that's my theory. My point is maybe that's why other solar systems have so many planets close to their respective star within the range of mercury as originally stated.

Ответить
@alex-freeman-CFH-817
@alex-freeman-CFH-817 - 09.10.2024 02:24

More like this plz!

Ответить
@Backedone-ss5vw
@Backedone-ss5vw - 29.09.2024 12:44

9:9 is not sufficient 🐐

Ответить
@bigchimptactical
@bigchimptactical - 28.09.2024 01:15

So cool!

Ответить
@johnlord8337
@johnlord8337 - 27.09.2024 03:36

The part of the Sun, Jupiter, and Saturn is correct. Applying any further accretionary model for planets and moons is not valid. Mercury was a rogue planet. EARTH (!) was a rogue planet. Venus was a rogue planet. THE MOON was a rogue planet. Uranus, Neptune, and dwarf Pluto, and all of the many other moons etc all came in after Jupiter and Saturn found their gravitational orbit boundaries. There is a far larger and complex story of the histories and accretionary origins of our solar system's planets and their many moons ... and the asteroid belt.

Ответить
@lawrenceklein3709
@lawrenceklein3709 - 27.09.2024 03:01

Now, let's get How the Universe Works back on the weekday morning schedule.

Ответить
@tomholroyd7519
@tomholroyd7519 - 27.09.2024 03:00

Hot jupiters. It is strange they are not called "low hanging fruit" --- we see these planets because they are the only ones we can see, please turn the page

Ответить
@Actor_bad24IK
@Actor_bad24IK - 26.09.2024 22:42

Crazy story....the universe is so mysterious

Ответить