Russia needs a spring offensive

The cope king of optimism has spoken. None of this will age well. Even now it blatantly contradicts reality. Russia had never more volunteers signing up than today - this has been verified by independent sources - and saying there's a reverse trend regarding territorial gains is just willfully ignorant, among other things.

Grazie.

Russia will have an even bigger problem if they launch the spring offensive and it crumbles under a hail of drones and artillery with hundreds of thousands of casualties after a mass conscription with little to no real gain.... again.

russia is losing ? pfuck is living in anothr universe 🤣🤣

Are we taking bets on whether or not Trump starts actively supporting Putin with American weapons and intelligence--even troops. Nothing would surprise me from that piece of $#!+

Oh my God, is that another "don't give your opponent problems, give him dilemmas" video? Y'all have been praising zelenskyy's every "strategic decision" in this conflict with that exact phrase, and yet the only ones who ever ended up pondering which of bad options to pick were Ukrainians. Truly, you don't even try to defeat or devastate Russia, you just actually doing it to Ukrainians. Being the US's ally indeed is fatal.

Yawn

Can the russians call up 160k men ?

So russian.offensives use minimal tanks and more meat waves? Does this mean ukraine could conduct localised offensives across the front line ?

TrAmp is working to help ruzzians and it is clear why. They poured billions into his election campaign and in his TrAmp coin scam

🙏🙏🙏 always great to

Why is this dude still around when he has been wrong in nearly every prediction

Som altid velinformativt foredrag Anders👍Længe leve Ukraine🍀❤👍

actually nuanced take

Drone war I

Drone war I

Hardcore Cope

In light of what the ruzzians have done lately, how do you see the scenario of the West/NATO effectively quadrupling our efforts to CRUSH them?
It seems we fail to understand the rule-of-law vs. their rule-of-power.

It's nice to get level-headed facts without hype or misinformation.

Thanks! For the Russians, it is a question of now or never. It reminds me of the successes the Middle Powers had in 1917: Russia was beaten and a breakthrough at the Isonzo. But a year later, they lost the war although they still were in the enemy's land (Compiegne). So, political success does not depend on square kilometers.

On the armoured vehicles I may be incorrect but I think both sides have essentially reduced them to support/local artillery roles. The effectiveness of drones means it simply becomes unsustainable to keep armoured vehicles in the field when a $5million tank can be knocked out by a $300 drone. Even if it takes 50 drones to knockout one tank that’s still $15,000 of kit to take out $5million of kit. No army is going to waste resources in such an inefficient trade.

After almost a year of offensive it is normal for the Russians to take their time to reorganise so Ukraine should expect to lose thousands more soldiers and territories and say that Russia is suffering attrition it is to make fun of the Ukrainian soldiers who have been unable to hold kursk for lack of everything weapons, soldiers, ammunition and Russia produces three more equipment with an incredible amount of ammunition for a country in economic crisis you awake it has been three years that we have been waiting for the great victory of the alliance of more than 30 countries 😅 to hear you the Ukrainians kill so many Russians that they are forced to withdraw from the cities they have sworn not to lose

Sun Tzu

How is it that Russia took over the Kursk region in such a short time?

With what ?

I have a new theory. That Trump's "brilliant" tariffs, to manipulate the stock market to make billions for his cabal, is going to cause a recession. It does this because the price of crude oil is dropping dramatically in anticipation of a recession. Maybe, just maybe, Putin's orange lap dog accidentally craters the Russian economy?

Maybe Trump is going to stop the war?🤣

The Russians have a bigger army, more men, artillery, tanks, shells, drones, planes, so how the heck is making the frontline longer helping the side (Ukraine) that has less troops/equipment to cover all of it??

The reduction of Russian armor on the front doesn't rule out conservation of it toward an anticipated offensive. That's just speculation, but the evidence should be taken with caution.

No mention of kursk

Video seems pretty heavy on the cope but I appreciate the perspective

great insights as always

Thank you.

Thank you for encapsulating the current situation with the Russo Ukrainian war so succinctly.

This war needs to end. Ukraine doesn’t have the manpower to evict Russia from its occupied territories. Russia doesn’t have the means to capture large swaths of territory. This war needs to be to negotiated to end, whether it’s good terms for the West or not.

Looking at your year old to two year old videos really shows the flaws in your analysis

Just to be clear: while Russian losses in tanks, artillery and other equimpent are without a doubt big, the reasson we’re seeing “less” armour is due to the fact that drones are constantly present and monitoring the battle space, so the approach Russia as the attacking side takes is it being very cautios not to concentrate large ammount of hardware in one place. That’s why in spring last year the Russians started using motorcycles as they allow troops to move faster, while in BMPs which have light armour (because they were made in Soviet times when drones weren’t a thing and the idea was to make tanks and other vehicles fast and agile, suitable for eastern land) if hit only ones, everyone gets killed (and they can carry up to 10 man)..
That’s why Russia advances slowly, as only small infantry groups of 5-10 man, sometimes even less (in Toretsk for example even according to Ukraine, the Russians used groups of 2-3 man to infiltrate and exploite gaps in defence) are tasked with conquering enemy positions.. and if they succeed, depending mostly on if they were spoted by drones, than more Russian troops reinforce those captured positions, if not, then more fire is concentrated on a certain position and then another small infantry groups tries to seize a position.. sometimes it takes only one such push, sometimes dozens, depending on how well prepared the assault is and how many Ukrainians are present..
This also means that Russian losses overal, both in manpower and equipment, are relatively big but still sustainable..
And I really don’t undestrand how Russian advance slowed down in recent months.. they keep capturing more territory in Sumy, around Kypiansk, Toretsk is finnaly liberated and there is movent north of it, there are noticable advancements in Zaporizhia around the village of Kamenskoe..

havent watched the whole video, but just to mention - putin never has a dillema. a dillema is a challange for someone who has brains and logic, so this is not the case. putins is always all in until whatever.

As usual, you measure success by the amount of ground conquered. This seems to be Western doctrine. But this is a war of attrition whose goal is to exhaust the opposing army. The Russians are not advancing because they don't need to. It is the Ukrainians who are coming at them by launching counteroffensives. The Ukrainians must show their supporters that they are capable of holding the front to obtain more weapons and money. When the Ukrainian army is no longer able to fill the gaps, it will collapse, and then the Russian tanks will advance quickly.

You are a liar ! BOLLOCKS ! 🤣

I wonder about the possibility that this offensive could wind up being the modern version of Russia's Summer (or Kerensky) Offensive in 1917. There was initial success for a couple weeks, but then the Russian soldiers refused to keep fighting and the Russian Army (and the Provisional Government) ended up collapsing under communist pressure a few months later.

Russia's economy is in serious trouble and not looking to improve anytime soon. Russia is starting to run out of 'volunteers' to staff meat wave attacks. Things don't look good for Putin in this 'last man standing' war in Ukraine.

Putin lost this war almost from the beginning, within a few weeks. His only chance of boasting a "victory" relies on Trump's absurd support.

Excellent outlook

Sorry Anders Puck Nielsen but you analysis is becoming silly.

With longer frontlines, Russian numbers count for less, and the Ukrainians have interior lines, so they can adapt faster and take the initiative more often

Anders .. Jeg har efterhånden MANGE gange spurgt, hvorfor du gengiver Ukrainske tal for russiske tab uden at stille spørgsmålstegn, mens du betvivler russiske tal om ukrainske tab? Er det god kildekritik at stole blindt på usubstantierede tal fra ukraines forsvarsministerium? Hvis ja, hvorfor gør du så ikke det samme, når du taler om ruslands påstande vedr ukrainske tab?
Det er selvfølgelig svært at sælge så "flot" et portræt af krigen, som du nok gerne vil, hvis du også skulle udføre basal kildekritik. Men vi er enige om at det ER basal kildekritik, ikke? Nu er du godt nok ikke uddannet historiker, men jeg antager, at også Forsvarets akademikere også ved, at man "de gode" ikke altid siger sandheden og at "fjenden" omvendt ikke altid lyver?

It is very hard to fight such war when you have only cowards in allies.

Crp.

Sending support and thanks from the US; thank you for supporting Ukraine! 🗽⚖️💪🇺🇦