What Language was before C

What Language was before C

Tsoding Daily

1 месяц назад

46,317 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@batsutafu
@batsutafu - 21.04.2025 07:37

why was i not subscribed to this shit lmao
"doing UI in c to piss off the react devs" instantly and forever converted me to a zizzoding stan

Ответить
@MCLooyverse
@MCLooyverse - 21.04.2025 03:45

This is the first time I've ever experienced being able to follow chat.

Ответить
@ndrechtseiter
@ndrechtseiter - 21.04.2025 00:41

Rust with its year-editions is like C++ with its year-standards. But C++ at least has a justification for this scheisse — it's not developed by a company, who's sucking Big G's D

Ответить
@dylancook3282
@dylancook3282 - 20.04.2025 22:29

we demand A

Ответить
@644654564564564
@644654564564564 - 20.04.2025 21:19

Did you know that most parts of the AmigaOS version 1.x where written in BCPL, the ancestor of B (and Assembler, notably for Kickstart ROMs, and C - mostly for libs)... Rewrite in C occured for v2...

Ответить
@ShaloopShaloop
@ShaloopShaloop - 20.04.2025 20:22

You are at the height of your powers zozin, beautiful stream

Ответить
@abtiwary
@abtiwary - 20.04.2025 19:57

You, sire, are the one true Crustacean! 🦞

Ответить
@brambasiel
@brambasiel - 20.04.2025 19:31

Crust makes Rust and C look like appealing languages...

Ответить
@acquite
@acquite - 20.04.2025 18:34

missed opportunity to make a function for each character of Hello world! and then main calls each function individually

Ответить
@abtiwary
@abtiwary - 20.04.2025 16:36

Rule 0: No Cargo, only rustc

Ответить
@sparshpriyadarshi
@sparshpriyadarshi - 20.04.2025 16:35

floppy disk for save. like.

Ответить
@jjtt
@jjtt - 20.04.2025 16:29

A true alpha chad Crust developer would use #![allow(warnings)]

Ответить
@lptimey
@lptimey - 20.04.2025 16:20

you can also always say as pointer.
let test: &str = "test";
test as *str;

Ответить
@nippi053
@nippi053 - 20.04.2025 15:42

c_size_t in nightly 🤣🤣🤣

Ответить
@Maximxls
@Maximxls - 20.04.2025 13:44

1. UNSTABLE FEATURES ARE UNSTABLE BUT MOSTLY COMPLETE there is usually not much reason to not use those.
2. UNSAFE FUNCTION SPECIFIER IS FOR THE CALLER, NOT THE IMPLEMENTER. WHY THE FUCK WOULD EVEN YOU THINK THAT
3. extern "C" functions CAN be implemented (if you want to call rust from C) and those CAN be variadic (unstable under feature(c_variadic) because "feature has not been properly tested on all supported platforms")
after the previous video and half of this one I just can't fucking shut up anymore this is so infuriating how much you misunderstand rust

also want to say that macros are totally not great in rust currently, there is no excuse for that

Ответить
@SunHail8
@SunHail8 - 20.04.2025 09:51

rust is just masking unsafe code + makes obfuscation wrappers to rape your debugger :)

Ответить
@momoyon10
@momoyon10 - 20.04.2025 09:43

cannot wait tsoding to program in A

Ответить
@oDonglero
@oDonglero - 20.04.2025 09:39

rust < crust < B U S T

Ответить
@rogo7330
@rogo7330 - 20.04.2025 09:26

Someone mentioned in the context of rust being noisy with warnings (bullshit like camel case, like really who cares and god forbid they make case of the variables part of the syntax) that it's like «-Wall -Wextra by default». It's not at all. -Wall -Wextra warnings in gcc are 99.9% on point. The only thing that I remember being stupid is about ISO C forbidding function definitions inside other functions when I tried to to a little static inline function in other big static function.

Ответить
@rogo7330
@rogo7330 - 20.04.2025 09:08

--betterB

Ответить
@RiteshRanjan-x4k
@RiteshRanjan-x4k - 20.04.2025 08:39

Make video on linux setup

Ответить
@LeaoMartelo
@LeaoMartelo - 20.04.2025 08:15

I have content for the whole day now

Ответить
@naranyala_dev
@naranyala_dev - 20.04.2025 07:11

rewrite porth in crust

Ответить
@naranyala_dev
@naranyala_dev - 20.04.2025 06:11

stb + nob

Ответить
@pimesonhadron
@pimesonhadron - 20.04.2025 05:42

What happens to the sanity of programmers when horrible runtime bugs ensue? :D
It’s a tradeoff - I’d rather have to think harder at compile time than pull my hair off at runtime (or at least less so)

Ответить
@siaal5001
@siaal5001 - 20.04.2025 04:04

"Rust developers are deranged" - Crust developer

Ответить
@ChickenFingers42
@ChickenFingers42 - 20.04.2025 04:02

The last ever programming language will be Z(ozinLang)

Ответить
@branchwag42
@branchwag42 - 20.04.2025 03:53

Hold the phone. Are those dynamic arrays??? 😂😂😂

Ответить
@multicoloredwiz
@multicoloredwiz - 20.04.2025 03:44

Disregard ast, generate fasm output directly

Ответить
@JamesSjaalman
@JamesSjaalman - 20.04.2025 03:05

IIRC Ken Thompson's (first) B/C-compiler was basically a set of asm macros.

Ответить
@saeedxgholami
@saeedxgholami - 20.04.2025 02:59

Such great idea that only missta zozin can handle; Writing B compiler with Crost

Ответить
@K4rmy
@K4rmy - 20.04.2025 02:23

This chat in subtitles is a genuinely a smart idea

Ответить
@mrAndersen777
@mrAndersen777 - 20.04.2025 01:35

I don't really understand if that rust-hate is trolling or not, but in case if it's not trolling I think I should clarify what rust actually is from a perspective of a developer who can write in dozens of languages and had been writing C++ and other compiled language code in production for a production systems (this is an important part) for almost 10+ years.

Rust is actually a miracle, neither the less. I don't know any other language that can GUARANTEE you that your application will never exit unexpectedly and will never have UBs if it compiles successfully (no unwrap, no except). Yes you will have to write a little bit more boilerplate code, but this is literally nothing compared to situation when you are searching for a segfault conditions in a production system that has more than 100k SLOC for weeks and weeks, trust me this is agony.

I don't even mention here some amazing built in features like no-gc, algebraic enums and compilation speed (10x faster than cmake + ninja for my local machine). Obviously rust has some downsides like lack of proper OOP, and some really complicated boilerplate for async coding, but again, this is simply nothing compared to what you will deal with for a real large production system.

In 2025 if you want to write some serious, mid to large scale system that will work as fast as C\C++ one -- you will choose rust in 99% of cases if you know that language well enough. I will simply never again write a C++ code in any new project, because this is really irrelevant now when i can do that in rust faster (because my app will compile faster), and safer (because if miss something i will not search that bug for hours, my app just't wont' compile)

Ответить
@siaal5001
@siaal5001 - 20.04.2025 01:04

> 4 hour vod
> begins using stb_c_lexer

Ответить
@000TheMatheus000
@000TheMatheus000 - 20.04.2025 00:50

big mistake, should have called the compiler "bc", like the cc, or rustc.
then when the code becomes too big, should rename it to "bbc"

Ответить
@Hypergenie
@Hypergenie - 20.04.2025 00:40

Are there people watched the full video?

Ответить
@Lightja_
@Lightja_ - 20.04.2025 00:26

I'll direct you to Leviticus 20:27 - Necromancy is illegal.

Ответить
@antropod
@antropod - 20.04.2025 00:00

Sick (b)eats

Ответить
@stephanpicker1975
@stephanpicker1975 - 19.04.2025 23:59

rust is still easier than dealing with my wife ^^

Ответить
@namefreenargrom5694
@namefreenargrom5694 - 19.04.2025 23:58

When gbc, blang or tbc?
When B++?

Ответить