Division & Unity in the Church: What's Worth It? [Think Biblically Podcast]

First and foremost, this conversation fails to understand that God is good! Paul Tries at every turn to, on the one hand defend the gospel, and on the other hand to upstage it. You all are talking in circles here. Confusion, not conclusions that look like the kingdom of Jesus Christ. You lost me.

[Leibniz's contingency argument for God, clarified]:

Ten whole, rational numbers 0-9 and their geometric counterparts 0D-9D.

0 and it's geometric counterpart 0D are:
1) whole
2) rational
3) not-natural (not-physical)
4) necessary

1-9 and their geometric counterparts 1D-9D are:
1) whole
2) rational
3) natural (physical)
4) contingent

Newton says since 0 and 0D are
"not-natural" ✅
then they are also
"not-necessary" 🚫.

Newton also says since 1-9 and 1D-9D are "natural" ✅
then they are also
"necessary" 🚫.

This is called "conflating" and is repeated throughout Newton's Calculus/Physics/Geometry/Logic.

con·flate
verb

combine (two or more texts, ideas, etc.) into one.

Leibniz does not make these fundamental mistakes.

Leibniz's "Monadology" 📚 is zero and it's geometric counterpart zero-dimensional space.

0D Monad (SNF)
1D Line (WNF)
2D Plane (EMF)
3D Volume (GF)

We should all be learning Leibniz's Calculus/Physics/Geometry/Logic.

Fibonacci sequence starts with 0 for a reason. The Fibonacci triangle is 0, 1, 2 (Not 1, 2, 3).

Newton's 1D-4D "natural ✅ =
necessary 🚫" universe is a contradiction.

Natural does not mean necessary. Similar, yet different.

Not-natural just means no spatial extension; zero size; exact location only. Necessary.

Newtonian nonsense will never provide a Theory of Everything.

Leibniz's Law of Sufficient Reason should be required reading 📚.......