Комментарии:
The condescending tone of this woman is staggering.
ОтветитьIt’s worth stating Israel doesn’t allow inspectors into their facilities, nor are they
ОтветитьNor are they signatories to any non-proliferation treaties.
ОтветитьFemoid zio shill : Sooooo extraordinary much benefits from the relationship with Israel!! It's sooo overwhelming it makes my eyes tear up from joy, it's sooo beneficial!
Then proceeds to not give a single example.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I just explained…🙄
Ответить😂ok honey, let the adults speak now
ОтветитьShe is too busy talking to listen! Forgets the points she is trying to refute! WTF is this guest!
ОтветитьHer position is the uninformed American population has a voice that should be heard. Seems absurd. You would first have to align true facts and actions with the language that describes said facts and actions. Government wants uninformed consent from people that think they are informed.
ОтветитьI'm a fan of Tim, but I think it's super weird he's wearing a heavy fleece in summer.
ОтветитьTim, you should let people know when they are hogging the mic! Regardless if I agree with that side, it makes the person seem disingenuous and mean!
ОтветитьChick's a demon
ОтветитьIt’s always women who are insanely pro war.
ОтветитьThis is the type of woman who will vote to send your sons and husbands to war while sitting at home giving her “expert opinion”
ОтветитьIsraels illegal acquired their nukes
ОтветитьThis lady is the best argument for why the 19th amendment should be repealed.
ОтветитьAnother reason to repeal the 19th
ОтветитьAmericans who think this is not directly a US war and is ONLY Israel's war are fucking delusional
ОтветитьTim simping for the deep state and MSM "polls" is wild. Its Iraq all over again. Everyone is falling in line and repeating all the same talking points, unanimous polls, etc.
Its also hilarious to watch this chick try and switch it around to "BB is Trump's bitch" when we all know its the other way around. Is real certainly isn't giving us whatever we want, funding us unconditionally, and doing our v beckoning. Interesting times for sure.
Tim: "Why don't we see the same protests for wheager Muslims in China?"
Because we don't see them indiscriminately bombed and decimated on live TV. Too ez. Does Tim have actual questions or just more gotcha Andy bullshit?
Childless cat lady that has no stakes. 92% of people wouldn’t have such a bloodlust for war if they had something to lose.
ОтветитьI could hear the nose on her
ОтветитьWhat frustrates me is how she downplays the “fear mongering”, as she calls it, of people who don’t want to get involved. She dismisses those opinions but what she’s failing to understand is these are the men and women who spent 20+ years in the ME. These are the husbands, wives, children, parents, and family that bore the cost. Missed milestones, anniversaries, holidays. The physical cost that left many disabled or otherwise scarred. Those men and women are now parents of military-aged children who would die before sending their kids to repeat that. We all bought the lie in the beginning. We all found clarity at different times but one thing remains the same: we will not let our government or any government lie our way into another forever war. Ever. You used and abused us. You do not get our children.
ОтветитьEveryone knows China is shipping rocket fuel because that's one of the items Iran is short of domestic production for Iranian homebrew missiles...
ОтветитьShoutout to Vet Bro for holding the line. Those who haven’t fought are always the most eager to start a war.
ОтветитьTim could never succeed in an actual debate. He wins by constantly interupting because he is the host. Loser.
ОтветитьHer opinion doesn’t matter. It has absolutely no consequence to her and her pampered protected life. She is exempt from the draft and has no obligation to sacrifice and fight for any of what she runs her mouth about. It is all just tough talk like a drunken woman at the bar who expects a man to defender her behavior. We have generations of men who spent the last 20 years fighting in the deserts of the same hemisphere and regions she pretends to know about. All these her “great” ideas are all the same rhetoric used before. Will she fight in the trenches against Iranian and Islamic fighters if we get the same results as the last few wars had with yer same talking points as excuses. The answer with much more certainty is NO she gets to live to advocate the next fear based snake oil solution that drags us back into endless wars and America policing a world into submission through shock and awe. America can draw the red line, if any country, nation or organization becomes unstable or radical to the point that the existing nuclear super power nations agree are a threat to causing global nuclear devastation, if they actually become in possession of a nuclear weapon the super power nations will destroy the location of that nuke and will collectively remove that government by what ever means necessary. As nuclear super powers we all have skin in the game to not want a nuclear chain reaction. It is in every stable nations interest to keep nukes where they are only a last resort defensive measure. With great power comes great responsibility. Shared by the existing nuclear powers. All other lesser nations should be pressed to build alliances with the existing nuclear countries for their defense and protection against greater threats. Leave it to the smaller countries to choose who they want to be their nuclear big brother. Nuclear weapons are a thing that exist in this world and we must except that the knowledge will forever exist and be able to be acquired. We must come to terms with that fact and the reality of a world where that is the case. It can not be uninvented. Precrime and preemptive threats should be taken serious but not justify committing the actual act we are accusing them of potentially considering. A clear and unified standard must be set by the global nuclear super powers that is as unwavering as it is virtuous and clear. We need to be reasonable and rational. They chant death to America at the command of their government. We have radicals who post social media messages demanding our government make their 90 million people (including women and children) into a glass parking lot. They can’t have a nuke because they might use it, we are the only nation to ever use a nuke and we did it twice. We have been raining heavy handed distraction and occupation campaigns in the hemisphere for 20 years. We have had our government agencies meddling in regime changes and toppling governments by provoking gorilla and terrorist organizations to take over. We have a government who no longer pays much attention to the will or rights of our own citizens and has conducted its own globalist policies on the world with little to no accountability to anyone. We need to fix our own country and become so prosperous and great that we dominate the world by example peace and strength. Listening to radical mouth pieces spewing opinions should be entertainment at best and an opportunity to have rational stable people of accountability expose their stupidity.
ОтветитьMy question for anyone thinking we should attack iran: Given that we don't attack Pakistan or North Korea because they have nukes, will attacking Iran here decrease or increase the chance of them wanting to get nukes? Will the attack decrease or increase the odds that there are acts of terror waged against the US? And if you say that that's why we need to do a regime change, can you cite a single example post ww2 where that made things better in the world?
And in response to the "So what, you're saying we should just let him get nukes?" My answer is "No, but at the very least the option that has failed 100% of the time should not be our go-to solution and perhaps we should try and figure out some other way about carrying out our goals."
Early life
Ответить“If you have regional ambitions, you need to understand your own capabilities.” The lack of self awareness…
ОтветитьWell.. this entire debate is moot now
ОтветитьDo these Zionist hardliners actually think guilting the west into fighting their jihad passive-aggressively is more morally righteous than Muslims calling for theirs openly?
Ответитьwell on the upside Trump's approval among fox news celebrity talking heads just went through the roof!
ОтветитьThere it is!! An hour and 15 minutes in, I’m an antisemite for criticizing the Israeli government. Get out the bingo card!
ОтветитьNope, wrong.
ОтветитьShe is dumb
ОтветитьKinda outdated just 24 hours later. God bless us all...
ОтветитьThey cheered for us in Iraq, I don't doubt that there are plenty in Iran cheering for us as well...
ОтветитьIf she has not signed up to be in the military that is going to be deployed if war breaks out then she can shut up respectfully.
It is women like her why I never want female leaders
Some people are delusional... War in general is Fearmongering, regardless of the cause...
ОтветитьThey're not "Bunkers" Tim, they're Vaults, get it right...
ОтветитьMan imagine having to put up with this bird everyday 😅
ОтветитьShe is too obvious. The brunette lady on earlier was more likeable and plays better to a more A.F.
She showed her hand to early.
Who is this lady ?. I like her.
ОтветитьThe mere existence of islam means the war will never end. The will to die for islam to spread islam exceeds the will of the west to kill to stop it while allowing it to exist in the west. Factor in birth rates and the west loses.
Ответить