Law Grad Breaks Down SCOTUS Overturning Chevron Deference

So this is good for the people, basically they bee. Operating out of jurisdiction

Does this impact criminal?

People must really understand the impact of this horrible decision. It's just completely unreal that the Supreme Court the arbiter, The Interpreter and the final say so about regulations developed by experts in their fields to prevent tragic consequences to Consumers workers to everyone who experiences some malfunction malfeasance some Corporation or manufacturer failure to prevent some tragic catastrophe. Thinking especially about horrible accidents that could be prevented or minimized if somebody did the right thing, paid attention like the BP oil spill tragedy Tacoma or workers who are smothered in tragic mudslides or improperly prepared trenches they're working in as I just heard today. Over 200 nearly 300 men killed over the last 10 years in these horrific accidents. This is just going beyond the absurd judicial prudence period the 10th Amendment clearly allows Congress to delegate that which is not spelled out in the Constitution to develop legislation which establishes agencies carry out all kinds of things a regulatory nature that protects consumers in all aspects of our American lives the Supreme Court Justices on in no way experts all the fields that impact our lives and quality of living and to be protected and safe.

So the courts took the power from the alphabet agencies and gave it to themselves (not the people). How could anyone trust a court system that doesn't even disclose the fact that they operate on maritime law (and all the word play games that go along with it) 🤔

The end of Chevron is not the end of regulation. We had lots and lots of regulation before Chevron was announced in the 1980s, and we can have lots and lots of regulation in the future. Congress can regulate by statute, of course, and it can also give the agencies clearer rules to work under. In fact, there is nothing in this decision that is inherently anti-regulatory; the decision only attacks the particular way much regulation has been done since the 1980s. By all means, let us have stricter regulation on certain fronts--so we get quieter helicopters, safer workplaces, fewer train derailments, and the like. We can get all of these things--and more--in a post-Chevron world. The real problem is not Chevron. It's that some people are philosophically opposed to regulation--and some of them have gotten themselves elected to Congress.

1984 life was different the world was so different, we had a republican administration for 8 years, Ronald Reagan, Reagonomics, trickle down economy.

I can agree with the left-wing side of this but what if the agencies which ideally are supposed to serve the public with their expertise, get captured by corporations. If regulatory capture is happening right now, how can we make sure that these bureaucrats are trustworthy and aren’t just sock puppets for corporations wanting to exert control?

So i can grow and do whatever As long as i don't hurt someone.

We are getting screwed matter what

The potential overturning of Chevron deference raises serious concerns, especially given the efforts of many mining companies to gain access to sacred Native American lands. Chevron deference allows courts to defer to federal agencies’ expertise in interpreting ambiguous statutes, often helping protect sensitive and sacred sites from exploitation.

Without Chevron deference, regulatory agencies like the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) could face more significant challenges in defending their decisions to protect these lands. This change could empower mining companies to bypass crucial environmental and cultural safeguards, leading to increased threats to sacred sites that hold immense historical, cultural, and spiritual value for Native American tribes.

The impacts of mining on these sacred lands can be devastating. Mining operations often lead to:

• Environmental Degradation: Destruction of natural landscapes, pollution of water sources, and loss of biodiversity.
• Cultural Erasure: Irreparable damage to sites of cultural and spiritual significance, which are integral to the identity and traditions of Native American communities.
• Health Hazards: Exposure to harmful chemicals and pollutants that can cause serious health issues for nearby communities.
• Economic Displacement: Disruption of traditional livelihoods, such as agriculture and fishing, due to environmental damage.

Protecting these lands is not only a matter of environmental stewardship but also of honoring the rights and heritage of indigenous communities. The weakening of regulatory protections through the loss of Chevron deference could undermine efforts to safeguard these sacred spaces from destructive mining practices.

Definitely to remove the corrupt activity that goes on in child support

Too bad she's the only one that can see the dislike button....

How can a law student be educated to a point where they lack awareness of logic? Does she not realize that under the old interpretation, Trump had power throw her in prison, by appointing someone to head an agency who didn't agree with her worldview? Just make her a felon overnight... How are some people so educated but miss the big picture?

You’re not wrong about what this law does you are very dishonest of how it will be abused per your example of oil tycoons.

Pretty simple to regulate...just make the appropriate law.

The GOP thinking on Chevron is directed by corporate interests which have only contempt for the health and safety of the American people. Instead, they want a return to days of Three-Mile Island, and Exxon Valdez.
The common objective-- more corporate profit, even at public expense.
The Chevron ruling exposes the profound corruption of the Roberts court, driven by ideology inconsistent with the constitution, itself.

What about the county saying i can only have 2 yardsales in one year on my property

You forgot all the 2A stuff where constitutional rights were being infringed. Yeah. You forgot to mention that 😒

This gives power back to people. The abrupt people.

trump did irreparably damage to this country…smh

This is a reversal of the very basis of Federalism!

Combine that with crowning Biden King - we are functionally in a post Constitutional world.

You're way off girly... You should be fighting for the common man not big government. This is a huge Boon for trucking and farming where vital vehicles have you come more and more and more complicated and inefficient and extremely expensive so much so that most have to mortgage their house to pay for unreliable equipment. I'm talking about the owner operators here not large corps. EPA has ruined the diesel engine. It's awesome though when a massive government agency tells you you're in the wrong but can't back it up but they don't have to because we're the laws ambiguous they are always right. That's called totalitarianism.

"Experts" 🙄

This was AN AWESOME decision.

And no this doesn't mean that corporations are going to just "dump oil" wherever they want.

Get a refund on your law degree specializing in the constitution.

Well, that is why they also need to repeal the decision that gave corporations personhood. Corporations should have never been considered legal fiction persons. But only allowed to be chartered to operate as long as they themselves follow the constitution and when they are chartered and not legal fiction persons that is in itself the ability for them to be regulated because of the commerce clause you could simply not renew there charter. Also, corporations should not be allowed to own real estate but simply pay to use it the public trust property.

So no more Fauci’s telling us what to do

Good Riddance!

How does this ruling affect State regulations? Particularly since NJ Governor said he will not follow the ruling.

Yeah, this is a bad take on the Chevron Deference. The unelected “experts” like Fauci should never have authority over the lives of Americans. Also, there are specific laws regarding hazardous waste that would cover her hypothetical waste disposal argument. This is clearly a partisan take on what should be a nonpartisan outcome. It’s the difference between government run by elected representatives and a bureaucratic state run by DEI’s and 2nd rate Good Enough for Government Work “experts”.

Girl!! You need to slow down to explain your stuff . It's soooo fast that you can't get the first sentence...clearly you can't teach ....

This is good.

Chevron created a quasi 4th branch of government with zero checks and balances.

Im a poor guy and I love this. The ATF has lost its power to make up rules. Its the EPAs fault our vehicles have gotten bigger and more expensive. Now that Chevron is dead, there are truck makers announcing small truck productions that have starting prices under $10,000. Before Chevron, cheap cars would be impossible. Thank you Loper and US Supreme court.

You say your a law person, but dont even know what actially happened. You of all people ahould be happy about this. This ruling just created thousands of more jobs for lawyers in countless of new categories.

Excellent explanation. You stated the point of getting rid of “chevron” exactly. The American people want limited government. We have way too much government. Once a problem reaches crisis proportions the Congress will act and the American people will be served. May “CAFE” be buried deep and in disgrace. It has destroyed the American auto industry. The American people don’t want to be told what cars to buy. May you have a successful career defending the US Constitution exactly as written. Not one word more!🚙

Except when the experts and specialists are paid actors on the payroll of the Rockefellers, Blackrock..and the like.
And Hey !!! The FDA approved using untreated sewage sludge to fertilize food crops..what could possibly go wrong ? That sounds like a perfectly sound practice doesnt it ?
And there's so much more thats so much worse.

As a black Man, I trust the Supreme Court more than I trust the federal agencies, because they were elected. I don't want the IRS coming up with new laws every year; I want less government. GOD Bless the Supreme Court of Justice

Democrats don’t like this ruling right now, but if republicans take control they’ll be glad the courts hold the authority.

What are you talking about? It gives power back to the people, NOT some unelected bureaucrat.

The ruling should have never happened to begin with. The fox guarding the hen house is an appropriate analogy. The government saying that their overreach of power as a ruling based on selectively chosen experts who have agendas, paid or not, is tyrannical.

A black woman whod never get elected ismad because now shell.never have power

I love how everyone is rabid that lobbyists can't install "experts" by means of large sums of money and favors anymore.
The conditioning is real.

Laws should only be made by elected officials. Anything else is ludicrous.

I believe in federal agencies however agencies have given themselves far too much power and have not not police themselves very well if at all. Unfortunately the federal agencies have brought this ruling upon themselves.

Who determines that the rules are ambiguous?

This destroys my consumer confidence in almost everything I buy haha

Okay so how do we switch it back?

I really like that business, AI, have some regulation. It cant be up to them.

Thanks for that.

This had more to do with atf than anything else. They were trying to change the rules on certain guns without it going through the house or senate. It was the correct decision because if not overnight would have made a lot of law abiding citizens felons just because of a rule change

Experts at stealing our money and theyve all perfected being Pathological Liars they are also lobbyists and lawyers who swear an oath to the British Bar Association.