Does Gravity Require Extra Dimensions?

Compactified dimensions is pure nonsense. It has zero meaning. It's such an idiotic explanation. I love you Spacetime but that is seriously nonsense.make 90 degree rotations in any direction you want. You will only ever point 6 unique directions. with each dimension having 2 directions. When you point in 8 unique dimensions then you will have 4d space. Size has nothing to do with dimensions. Rolling something up requires it to rotate through dimensions. It's such a lazy stoner answer.

So a tesseract doesn't prove anything? Just pretty mathmatics?

Let’s look at how condensed matter (galaxies, superclusters, etc.) lenses extra-dimensional time, or halo. Again, this is the only explanation for how we can communicate nearly instantly with extraterrestrials many light years distant from us. It’s also how we get extra-dimensional overviews of the universe, like e.t.’s do in everyday consciousness. To attenuate your sensitivities and be able to lens extra-dimensional time via condensed matter contours (fractions of the entire universe) is easy. This is how e.t. minds translocate across vast expanses of time in order to both extend longevity and know the universe. It’s easy and it neatly defines the extra dimensions of e.t. thought. As a result, we can look at the condensed-and-halo relationship as an expanded, extra-dimensional kind of thought process, our best way to participate in many-minds e.t. conscious. Although, at first it may seem like it merely poses a parallel process, it underlies all thought in many-minds community. It’s a better way to understand how we remotely communicate with e.t.’s (and humans) of the universe. No other model comes close to explaining this.

yes very much so, the 4th curves reality spherically and the 5th dimension is the expansion into everything, which makes down down. The whole universe expands as our host singularity evaporates, right at the centre is a point null of its own distortions in spacetime, like at the core of a planet, its null in gravity, when you are there you are weightless, this is your reference centre, or bottom of your time cone.

At that central point of the planet, you and it expand 5th dimensionally at the same rate. You are still null in the effect of gravity as you and the universe scale at the same rate, but you dont exist there. You exist thousands of miles away from that point. The planet expands 5th dimensionally way more than you do in the same time, so you feel like you are falling to where your speed is going to give you an orbit, once there you are weightless, your temporal and physical locations are out of sync. At your current speed location and direction, you should be inside the earth at a much smaller orbit. Gravity is that temporal dislocation, but the only reason down is down is because time ticks one way. The expansion of the universe is one directional, outward. Expanding infinitely inside finite space, the only place that is possible is beyond an event horizon, its how the universe holds its vacuum, its how it seems to change over time, giving the illusion of the big bang, but you cant reach the big bang. its an illusion of using time cones like a Gleason map, you end up with an ice wall to the edge if you dont pin it to the observer, same as a CMB or big bang.

Rewinding the universe it only gets to a point of infinity if you dont shrink with the universe. Pausing your dilation is impossible, you would never see the big bang. Just as you can never see the edge of the Earth, the 4th dimension curves the horizon. It only exists when you dont update your geodesic so it follows the observer. Pin the time cone or Gleason map to the one using it and both are relatively useful and that illusion evaporates. The big bang/CMB are the same illusion as the ice wall, if you can only think in circles when the universe is relatively flat on every fundamental level

I dont need dark energy to explain why or where we expand, just an evaporating singularity and a point right at its centre, its small and compressed and hot that side of the fence, and its cool and expansive when you dilate time down to our tick rate, as the singularity evaporates that central point grows, everything inside it can relax and your atoms expand to fill the void in spacetime. You never see the univseral expansion, but you feel it as gravity, and old light waves didnt dilate so they record the change over time. Light waves are information waves riding information waves, it doesnt dilate the same way we do, it doesnt do orbits, spacetime does... light just travels forward in time relentlessly until something stops it. The geodesic of reality is what makes things curve, the earth and light doesnt curve, spacetime does. When you see the planet curving you are seeing the bend in spacetime which light ignores.

Its really admirable how this experiment was made , very impresive in that time and now😅

Not going to lie but Interstellar brought me here. Super interesting stuff.

Nice❤

I wonder if you could have dimensions that are too large to notice. So big that no meaningful movement in those directions can be measured. Just a thought

The is nothing on the other side of the event horizon. All events happen on this side of the horizon. It’s the ‘end’ of the universe.

I’m confused, you keep calling Cavendish’s balls an experiment but it’s not. It had no phenomenon and therefore no hypothesis. Sounds to me like a high level of bullshittery, implying there’s empirical data when there really isn’t any. That’s modern science!

Oh I see the problem. You think gravity is a force. It’s not. It’s an effect of the curvature of space time caused by uneven distribution of mass. Ya see, over a hundred years ago this guy named Einstein came along and changed things.

We only need three dimensions and one variable in the form of time, if we have a geometrical process that uses spherical symmetry. The geometrical aspect of this process can be based on Huygens’ Principle of 1670, that says:
“Every point on a wave front has the potential for a new spherical 4πr² wave”

Each point on the curvature of the wave front forms the potential for a new photon ∆E=hf of energy, a new oscillation or vibration as the future comes into existence.

We have to square the radius r² of the sphere 4πr² because the process in unfolding on the spherical surface. The 2D surface forms a manifold for the two aspect of positive and negative charge.
Therefore we have the speed of light squared c² we have the charge of the electron squared e² and the probability wave function is squared Ψ².

This theory is supported by the fact that photon ∆E=hf energy is continuously transforming
potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter, in the form of electrons e². Kinetic energy is the energy of motion, of what is actually happening!

The interior of the sphere 4πr² is naturally three-dimensional with centre of the sphere forming a constant of minimum quantity within the geometrical process. We see this mathematically h/2π as the Planck Constant h divided by 2π representing the geometry.

The Planck constant h/2π represents minimum quantity in space and time and is formed by the radius r² squared being a constant relative to the spherical surface. The 2π representing circular geometry that is formed by the spherical symmetry.

To me the hierarchy problem is suspicious; it looks more philosophical than scientific. I can't see a reason why gravity should be closer to other interactions, and if it was, people could wonder why it is so close. It's explaining one mystery with another mystery so I can't see how it could lead to a potential discovery. It's like explaining the number of planets in the Solar System with platonic solids like Kepler did – it's a fun coincidence but it's more scientific to explain it with some form of mechanism based on established theories.

The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Consider the fourth dimension. Consider what is THE EYE. Two AND three dimensional SPACE are BALANCED. Consider TIME AND no time. WHAT IS E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma. Gravity/acceleration involves what is balanced inertia. This CLEARLY explains the motion of WHAT IS the Moon. Great. The fourth dimension is consistent with the motion of WHAT IS the Moon.

By Frank Martin DiMeglio

Gravity is the product of acceleration and a dimension of restoring torque.

Gravity, the inverse square changing according to distance is also used as an alternative to darkmatter to explain observed phenomena like galactic rotation.

That background art is amazing.

I think we need to go back to 1/r² and the three dimensional physics of the Inverse Square Law! Spherical 4πr² geometry is fundamental to this process and this is based on Huygens’ Principle of 1670 that says,
“Every point on a light wave front has the potential for a new spherical 4πr² light wave".

The spherical interior is naturally 3D and we can think of each point on the curvature of the wave front as a potential photon ∆E=hf electron interaction as vibrations forming resonance. The spherical 4πr² surface forms a 2D boundary condition or manifold for the uncertainty ∆×∆pᵪ≥h/4π of everyday life.

내가 고등학교 때 습득한 과학지식은 우주공간은 원자로 이루어져 있으며 완전 유전체 물질수지 공간이며 질량보존의 법칙이 기본법칙이다 중력 빅뱅 배경복사 팽창 등 아무것도 일어나지 않으며 원자 자기력으로 움직인다 이것이 암흑 에너지다 자기장이 있는 물질이 회전을 하게 되면 내부의 압력으로 열이 발생하면 지구의 용암 태양의 홍염 코로나 태양풍 흑점과 같은 현상이 생기며 자기장은 자기장의 가두기로 태양은 타고 있으며 타지않으면 블랙홀이다 블랙홀의 중심은 메타물질과 같은 암흑물질이 생기며 폭발은 없으나 폭발하게되면 극지방으로 빠저나간다 그리고 달과 화성에 운석의 충돌 흔적이 많은 많은 보면 자기장의 차이이며 제 역할을 할때는 운석을 밀어내나 역전현상이 생기면 충돌로 이어진다 공룡의 멸종을 부른 운석의 충돌은 자기장이 자전축의 변화로 일어난 것이며 동식물의 진화에서 동물의 진화는 난활의 시작이 진화를 보여준다 동물극과 식물극의 차이로 동물의 진화는 결정된다 공룡의 알은 노출된 것으로 나와 있으며 그러면 털이 있어야 알을 부화할수 있으나 복원된 공룡이 털이 있는 종류는 하나도 없다 인류의 진화는 유인원에서 시작된 것이 아니라 인 류라는 독자적인 개체에서 진화를 하였으며 유태반류의 높은 지능을 가진것은 유태반류의 특징이며 지구상의 최고의 포식자로 자리매김한 예를 보여준다 인류의 영양상태가 좋아진 것은 녹색 혁명을 맞이 하면서 좋아진 것이다 그리고 식인풍습 근친혼은 근대에도 행해졌으며 이러한 결과는 유전병을 달고 살았으며 유골로만 진화를 판단하는 것은 오류다 흰머리 스트레스 멜라닌 과산화 수소 이것은 흰머리가 나는 주요 원인이다 그러나 이것은 면역과 효소에 의한 것이다 그러나 인간의 의학은 원인만 알지 과정과 결과는 모른다 면역과 효소가 어떻게 일어나는지 서술하지 못한다 스트레스도 쥐를 통해서 가스와 전기자극으로 스트레스를 주면 자손들은 모두 유전된다 식물은 광합성을 하면 영양분이 대부분 토양에 뿌려진다 뿌리의 ARF7 물질을 제거하면 수분을 감지하지 못한다 그러나 인간의 과학지식은 원인이 무엇인지 모른다 화학반응과 물질이다 답은 서술하지 못한다 동식물은 꼬리없는 정자와 꼬리있는 정자로 수정을 하며 어류는 부유성 어류는 성전환을 하며 저서성 어류는 난활때 성이 정해진다 성이 정해질수 빡에 없는 이유가 있다 양자 역학의 스핀은 전자기파에 의해서 영향을 받으며 중첩과 얽힘에서 얽힘은 반물질이며 전하를 계산할수 있다 입자성과 파동성을 동시에 볼수있는 예가 햭 연료 제어봉의 푸른빛이 현상이다 그리고 달과 화성에 운석의 충돌 흔적이 많은 것을 보면 자기장의 차이이며 제 역할을 할때는 운석을 밀어내나 밀어내나 생기면 충돌로 이어진다 공룡의 멸종을 부른 운석의 충돌은 자기장이 자전축의 변화로 일어난 것이며 동식물의 진화에서 동물의 진화는 난활의 시작이 진화를 보여준다 동물극과 식물극의 차이로 동물의 진화는 결정된다 공룡의 알은 노출된 것으로 나와 있으며 그러면 털이 있어야 알을 부화할수 있으나 복원된 공룡이 털이 있는 종류는 하나도 없다 인류의 진화는 유인원에서 시작된 것이 아니라 인 류라는 독자적인 개체에서 진화를 하였으며 유태반류의 높은 지능을 가진것은 유태반류의 특징이며 지구상의 최고의 포식자로 자리매김한 예를 보여준다 인류의 영양상태가 좋아진 것은 녹색 혁명을 맞이 하면서 좋아진 것이다 그리고 식인풍습 근친혼은 근대에도 행해졌으며 이러한 결과는 유전병을 달고 살았으며 유골로만 진화를 판단하는 것은 오류다 흰머리 스트레스 멜라닌 과산화 수소 이것은 흰머리가 나는 주요 원인이다 그러나 이것은 면역과 효소에 의한 것이다 그러나 인간의 의학은 원인만 알지 과정과 결과는 모른다 면역과 효소가 어떻게 일어나는지 서술하지 못한다 스트레스도 쥐를 통해서 가스와 전기자극으로 스트레스를 주면 자손들은 모두 유전된다 식물은 광합성을 하면 영양분이 대부분 토양에 뿌려진다 뿌리의 ARF7 물질을 제거하면 수분을 감지하지 못한다 동식물은 꼬리없는 정자와 꼬리있는 정자로 수정을 하며 어류는 부유성 어류는 성전환을 하며 저서성 어류는 난활때 성이 정해진다 성이 정해질수 빡에 없는 이유가 있다 양자 양자 스핀은 전자기파에 의해서 영향을 받으며 중첩과 얽힘에서 얽힘은 반물질이며 전하를 전하를 있다 입자성과 파동성을 동시에 볼수있는 예가 햭 연료 제어봉의 푸른빛이 현상이다 서양의 양자 역학은 불확정성의 원리와 같은 보이지 않는 미적분의 양자 역학이 아니라 동양의 동양 철학의 무극이 태극이요 태극이 무극이요 란 팔괘에서 시작 되면서 보이는 양자역학 미시적인 양자역학 거시적인 원자 자기력을 보여준다 양자 컴퓨터는 원소와 원리를 알아야 할것이다 일반 컴퓨터도 양자 컴퓨터의 효과를 낼수있다 이것뿐만 아니라 인간이 만든 최고의 폭발물은 원폭이다 과거의 원폭은 우랴늄이 주원료로 사용된 것이라면 현대는 기폭제만 우랴늄이고 주원료는 수소다 이것은 우랴늄 기체 폭탄에는 수류탄 급이다 아르곤 가스가 우랴늄 기체다 여기에 두 종류의 기체를 첨가하면 독특한 반응을 보이는데 수소가 소진할때까지 반응한다 즉 멸종이다 초전도체라는 이론이 나온지 백년이 넘어도 물리적특성도 개념도 모른다 오비탈이 0이고 전기저항이 0이다 이를 수용하는 물질이 우랴늄염이 있다 그리고 직류에만 작용하는 이유와 BTS 이론이 맞지않는 이유가 무엇일까.프라즈마 초전도체 우랴늄염 지구의 내핵 용암 자기장이 같은 현상이다 그러나 설명하지 않는다 답 보다 논리가 문제다 한 나라의 국방은 항공모함에 달려있다 이 항공모함의 제일 큰 비중은 캐타펄트이며 수증기식이나 전자식이나 문제가 많다 제일 적은 비용으로 할수있는 방법이 폭약식과 유압식이다 그리고 추진기의 기술은 보여주지도 않는다 그 이유는 추진기만 보면 음파를 알수있기 때문이다 그러나 이 음파도 조와저항을 줄이면 음파도 줄일수 있다 인간의 통증을 다스리는 봉독이 중합 효소인 까닭과 결합과 성분이 병에 작용하는 원리는 무엇일까 그리고 독버섯의 독과의 같은 점은 무엇일까 그리고 이 같은 자료가 5년 동안 몰래카메라 한국 방송공사 인간극장 촬영으로 얼마나 아래와 같은 자료가 남의 손에 들어 갔는지 모른다 이것은 처음에는 상사병 이라고 주민들에게 알려져 있었으나 본질은 논문 대필용이었다 실제로 그 다음해 2월에 논문이 인터넷에 나왔으며 그 후에도 몇편더 확인할수 있었다 그리고 안기부 맨하탄 솔루션 문 제인 대통령도 자주 왔었던 걸로 주민들은 알고 있으며 나는 그기에 대해서는 잘 모른다

I don't know if I buy small, compact dimension, at least not all of them. We don't really know what the total force of gravity is or how it behaves in any other dimensions. What if we inhabit one of the compact dimensions, and that's why we have four of them so close to each other (space+time).

what means PBS in " PBS Spacetime "

looks like an elegant way to introduce another field

You can arrive at a theoretical multiverse by expanding the temporal dimension into three temporal dimensions, and that goes along with the quantum multiverse nicely

Cavendish was a 🤡 and what he did was not an experiment. An experiment attempts to recreate a natural phenomenon. In this case there is not phenomenon to induce.

Gravity could just be weak. The fact that gravity is weak isn’t actually a problem. It’s a pseudo-problem because some physicists just don’t like the asymmetry. They want another theory that makes the numbers more neat, ie that makes all the forces capable of being one force.

Actually, gravity in an absolute sense, would tequire 5 dimensions (2 vould be vomplex): 3D tangible gravity + latent diverging self-convergence + latent converging self-convergence. The inertia of the universal background establishes a time constant for response such that there is a threshold of gravity tangibility that depends upon intimacy of locus.

Linearity is the usual default dimension of gravity applicay; in bulk outer space, 3 dimensions are essential. But in primordial space or proximate to a huge disruption like a star, 3D may be essential to apply frequency gravity to nonuniform moving masses and mass flows. Stars hide vortexes routinely.

I think gravity becomes a force when a great enough mass is formed. Until then, there is no gravity.

The arrows DO NOT point inward they point outward gravity is emitted from a planet like light from the sun the gravity waves EMITTED pull objects INTO them

I think these "extra dimension" theories qualify as "extraordinary claims requiring extraordinary evidence." Someone needs to be able to actually point at them. Compactification just feels like a reach to me. Also requiring extraordinary evidence.

always makes me think that so called "i" were originally meant to be "lateral" numbers by Gauss.... which I felt might be more insightful.

Wow, it’s a good thing gravity doesn’t actually exist on this flat plane we live on.

I know commenting on a three-year-old episode is probably futile, but: The anomations and illustrations used in this one are really good. They seem to me far superior to those used in any other episode I've seen so far. So what happened? Ran out of money? Ran out of imagination?

It's it possible that gravity IS the Casmir Effect?

Could that be a hint toward quantum gravity theory? Maybe we can't measure gravity closer than the Casmir Effect range is because they're the same force. With masses only allowing certain frequencies of spacetime to resonate in the directions between them.

Congrats on 2 million subs, Matt!!

Just like Peter Griffin, I love it every time he slips in "spacetime",

Could it still be that our world is a projection into 4d from eg 5d, where each dimension is large (ie non compactified).

3.02M subscribers in jan 2024

For some time now, I’ve (loosely/intuitively) hypothesized that gravity is the only one of the forces that is “dispersed” across “all” of the dimensions… while the other forces, only really “interact with” our four known dimensions.
Due to this, what we refer to as “dark” (matter and/or energy), is simply “dark” because it exists within those other dimensions which we are (at present) still unable to perceive.
Interesting to hear a very similar concept mentioned in this video. I’m excited to hear more in the future, regarding development of this idea, what we will learn, how this “pans out”, etc.

I'm confused because we literally already know due to relativity that the 4th dimension exists as time, and that gravity IS the curvature of time. This is why we follow geodesics, because curvatures in time create curved paths that objects follow in a straight line as they flow forward through time. Given this fact then gravity wouldn't see any change with 4 dimensions as that's already how it works. Even if we didn't know that, IF that was already how it works, we wouldn't be able to detect any change by detecting gravitational waves cause they would ALREADY be affected by the 4 dimensions. Either way we'd be trying to apply the inverse square law which regards 3 dimensions to a new dimension that we have no idea works the same. It's like trying to prove a false idea of something that's already there while not knowing it's there with the fact that its there as one of the controlled variables on which the experiment is built then not seeing a change and declaring it isn’t there. Like trying to prove fire doesn't exist by lighting a flame on fire and saying it doesn't exist because it didn't catch.

This is actually the best channel.

How could a person who has learned so much about physics be so stupid about physics?

Gravity cannot be unified with the other forces because gravity isn't a force.

This video is as stupid as talking for 16 minutes about trying to fit diamonds into the evolutionary family tree of animals. It cannot be done because diamonds aren't animals.

I can understand half the viewers of such videos (many of whom don't remember anything from high school physics) not knowing that gravity isn't a force. However, this guy has learned far more than high school physics. So what's his excuse for this sad lack of basic understanding.

But gravity isnt a force

I still puzzles me that good old Albert postulated that gravity is not a force but a consequence of space-time curvature 🤔
And yet a lot of scientists still try to combine gravity with with the three other forces…

Gravity requires quarks vibration at near the speed of light held together by gluon strong nuclear force creating mass.
How many decisions does this require ?

Is there anything important that distinguishes universal constants that have units versus ones that are unitless?

Why do you keep calling gravity a force? That’s over a hundred years out of date.

Anybody scratch their butthole and sniff in the day if you do I would say it's strange

Me hoping this isn’t M theory