Комментарии:
Ramram is barely relevant here. Drident pop imperm prevents duster from being negated. Obviously ramram is better because you keep the drident pop but MBT had no cards in hand so I doubt it mattered.
ОтветитьI always wondered how people remember every effect that their Zoodiac monster has, specially when is the attached monsters effect. The answer is they don't, apparently.
ОтветитьEveryone forgets about cobalt sparrow permanently giving the xyz monster target immunity.
ОтветитьI flat out won a game because someone Accesscoded into my Atk position Recital Starling
ОтветитьI mean yeah he messed up but if there was a guy on the other side backseat dueling like he just did,he woulda said "detach ram ram. Detach ram ram" but you know.. a loss is a loss I guess. Besides,i hate feather duster
ОтветитьContexto para alguien que no tiene ni idea de yugioh
ОтветитьInb4 Zeus
ОтветитьNot only that, you can pop any of the three cards with drident to let the hfd resolve.
ОтветитьHad an opponent during XYZ Festival that similarly didn't read cards. They went first, setting up a Drident and passed. Without backrow.
My turn, I draw and scale a Purple Poison Magician in the left pendulum zone and they decide it's a good idea to pop it.
My opponent left the game after I popped the Drident. Easiest game ever.
After watching this video, my brother and I jumped to Master Duel to test this out:
First out: Ramram
Second out: Blow impermanence, is not face up on a column at resolution, so it doesn't negates Duster, backrow blown.
Third out: Blow Drident herself, Impermanence needs to negate it's target to resolve and negate Duster.
That is it, blowing Duster doesn't stop the negate, since Impermanence negates the effects of cards, and not the card itself, so even if it leaves the field, the effect (for people who doesn't get this, think of the effect resolving where the number is in master duel, not where the card is when it happens), end of this, now obligatory joke where i say this person was 3 times an idiot.
Um what happened?
Ответитьas a satellerknight main, this hits home.
ОтветитьI played against a Zoo player who tried to activate Drident when I only had set cards on the field. I love when the opponent doesn't read their own cards.
ОтветитьIs the vod of this stream still around? MBT+Farfer playing set 5 pass sounds awful but I'm intrigued.
ОтветитьHe also could have just activated Drident to pop the Imperm
ОтветитьHe could’ve popped harpies as chain link 3 so it could leave the field before imperm resolved
ОтветитьKnow your Cards, or THAT will happen Everytime
ОтветитьGenuinely why do you think Yugioh player’s don’t read their cards? Discussion
ОтветитьRam Ram ranch really rocks
ОтветитьReading is a Yugioh players worst nightmare
Ответитьthis with Vampire Sucker... i have free lava golem and i forgor
Ответитьwait ramram actually has a useful effect? not a zoo player btw
ОтветитьThat is an insanely nice thumbnail to video transition
Ответитьmbt play earth machine
Ответитьmaybe he thought he couldn't respond to imperm? I used to be misinformed on spell speed and thought only traps could respond to traps (probably due to counter counter originally not being printed as a counter trap card)
ОтветитьImagine not knowing your own cards lol
ОтветитьHow do I install this game?
ОтветитьI once made Crystal Wing with Windwitch Snow Bell which gives destruction effect immunity, and the other player activated three different destruction effects before pausing for two minutes and then scooping.
ОтветитьThe issue with that is he might have been worried about a solemn strike
ОтветитьThat's what happen when decks become engines, people stop caring about their secondary effects.
ОтветитьIMPERM COLUMN!
ОтветитьIs this the progression or traditional?
ОтветитьNot only that but If im not mistaken, If you destroy impermanence It doenst negate the column, i remember once i did mst after he tried negating column And then my other spell resolved after destroying imperm even though they were in same column
Ответить"This glue is tasty but I wonder why the decklist tells me to run Ramram?"
Ответитьsad that you can't really replicate this on master duel. i was once playing phantasm spiral against zoodiac in xyz festival, and both my opponent and i were low on resources, and i would have been in a great spot if i could spiral attack pop my opponent's drident, the catch being it had ramram as material. i didn't know the effect (chances are neither did my opponent), and i lost the game from there.
ОтветитьJoseph be like: who needs an judgement, if you have THE IMPERM COLUMN, also please forget about ramram, please, just PLEASE, YES HE DID Ha Ha YOU IDIOT! Anyways moving on
ОтветитьAs the Progression Playoffs would say: “Coaching!”
ОтветитьEven if he didn't have ramram couldn't he have just drident pop itself so Imperm doesn't resolve thus not negating duster. A 2 for 5 trade sounds perfectly fine..
Ответитьit would have been so much funnier if they detached Ramram and then said
"drident eff, pop infimp"
he forgor
ОтветитьAnd this folks is why ya don't forget about Ramram
ОтветитьLiterally cheating lmao
Ответить