Комментарии:
To bad our recruiting and retention can't keep up
Ответить🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 AMERICA , FUCK YEAH 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
ОтветитьIts a wonder that they can get anyone to enlist in the military.
ОтветитьWow spending it so much on military, is so dumb. They gotta stop and start spending on upgrading life for the citizens and people of u.s.a instead, i consider that way more important. The u.s.a military is good enough already
Ответить🗣Joe Manchin mentioned 🗣 most young people in WV with a brain can see Manchin for the leech that he is, but we are outnumbered by the elderly, so he keeps getting re-elected.
Ответить35% of Americans think we spend too much, which means that 65% don't think we spend too much.
ОтветитьThe U.S. military is not the world's police force. The U.S. military is a protection racket. Wall Street's intelligence agencies go around the world starting chaos, to justify the Pentagon sending the U.S. military in. It's no different, although on a much larger scale, to the mafia in New York.
ОтветитьI agree with you. Way too much money is spent on the military that could be spent benefiting the people.
Ответитьgrey zone warfare is genuinely terrifying. alot of it is PMC's too
ОтветитьThe political classes start wars. Neither the military nor industry has the power to do so. Eisenhower was just making the innocent into scapegoats.
ОтветитьOutlaw campaign contributions.
ОтветитьI have nothing but respect for the men and women who risk their lives for me. I do hate how government uses our military
ОтветитьMrBeat: Military spending has BI-PARTISAN support.
Also MrBeat: You are the boss of those politicians, go out AND VOTE!
Confusion intensifies
saying the US is "constantly" at war because of the "military industry complex" is baby thinking. when other industries (that's profitable by tenfold) would generate way more money, even for the politicians, when there's increased trades and no war
you mention "huge" military budget but chooses to ignore the overall federal budget, we spend twice as much on healthcare, almost half of Americans are huge and have some type of health problem caused by obesity, when will you talk about the obesity industrial complex?
Our tax is for war....
ОтветитьIf the US is the world's police, name a country they stood up for, or saved from war. Your country thinks deep, just a tiny bit shallower than Putin.
ОтветитьThey gave alot of that to Ukraine disgusting there’s so much missing money in the government but it’s not missing it’s going to Israel Ukraine and the illegals
ОтветитьThere is some validity to this video, but I don’t think it’s as big as people think. If you are a politician and you have a lobbyist from Lockheed Martin and Microsoft waiting to talk to you, which lobbyist are you going to talk to first?
ОтветитьThe cost of military turn into the salary of weapon maker,politicien etc. Force other country to hand over money as much as they can.
ОтветитьIt’s insane that just saying that this is a bad thing makes you “anti-American” and people tell you to go move to Venezuela lmao
ОтветитьOh my god and WHY SHOULD WE CARE ABOUT THEM? We should just be wealthy we dont need to be policing and micromanaging the world, id rather keep more money in my pocket the world we dont need why?? Geez clean up the united states first take care of american citizens first! This is madness! Look we dont need allies we dont need the world the USA is sufficient self sufficient ok? The USA is like a tiger we dont need a pride or a pack we can sustain ourself.. and we will be wealthier if we actually stop poking our noses into other countries business
ОтветитьYes, the military industrial complex is but one component, maybe the most important one, ruining American society. It's destroying whatever upsides the idea of capitalism might have had for our society.
ОтветитьWhen you sell weapons of war you need war to make money.
WW2 America made a lot of money from not being in the war. Japs put that to an end lol
America is undoubtedly the greatest country in this world
ОтветитьLike told Dwight D. Eisenhowwr, the the military complex is the ones who rule government. Democrats and Republicans
ОтветитьAmericans are essentially working for Israel.
ОтветитьThe USA military isn’t the world police so much as a world mafia. Check out Noam Chomsky, he’s great at explaining it.
ОтветитьWorld police is correct sometimes feel they get themselves involved in things an other country’s problems way to much modern day Babylon
ОтветитьNordVPN is generally considered a better choice than AdGuard VPN due to its wider range of features, stronger security protocols, and better performance. However, AdGuard VPN is a decent option for basic privacy and security needs, especially if you already use AdGuard's ad-blocking software.
Here's a breakdown of the key differences:
Features:
* NordVPN: Offers a wider range of features, including a kill switch, split tunneling, Onion over VPN, and obfuscated servers.
* AdGuard VPN: Offers a more limited feature set, focusing on basic privacy and security features.
Security:
* NordVPN: Uses strong encryption protocols, including AES-256-GCM, and has a proven track record of security.
* AdGuard VPN: Uses strong encryption, but has had some issues with DNS leaks in the past.
Performance:
* NordVPN: Generally offers faster speeds and more reliable connections than AdGuard VPN.
* AdGuard VPN: Can be slower than some other VPNs, especially on long-distance connections.
Pricing:
* NordVPN: Offers a variety of pricing plans, including monthly, yearly, and two-year options.
* AdGuard VPN: Offers a more limited pricing plan, with only monthly and yearly options.
Ultimately, the best VPN for you will depend on your individual needs and priorities. If you need a VPN with a wide range of features and strong security, NordVPN is a better choice. If you are looking for a simple and affordable VPN for basic privacy and security, AdGuard VPN may be a good option.
Had to put my comment supporting paid and better VPN service, but also i love that you are taking this shit head on man! The United States is as corrupt as it gets.
ОтветитьIm waiting for the part where you mention the donations to these elected peoples from people like Boeing and other defense entrepreneurs.
ОтветитьWhat about calling it the M3C, the Military + Contractors + Congressional Complex?
ОтветитьThe mil industrial complex is such a tired meme. Defense companies make fuck all money while providing unimaginable value to the state.
Ответить@iammrbeat are you familiar with Ryan McBeth? He recently put out a video on the MIC and how it hasn’t been a thing since 1993 after “the last supper”. He addresses all the claims in his video that you’ve made here with what seems to me to have credible evidence rebutting them. I’d love it if you addressed his video or even better if you got him on the channel for a chat on the topic.
ОтветитьThey dont make any money😂 these companies are making all this money where??? Apple makes like 10x what the military industrial complex makes combined
Ответитьi subscribed a few videos ago but this one made
me love your channel
Just a reminder that defense companies don’t even crack the top 50 largest US companies by revenue. The idea that the MIC is constantly keeping the US at war is a myth. It also gives authoritarian leaders a free pass when they are aggressive and invade their neighbors. Cause people here will just blame the MIC. We’ve already seen that with Ukraine
Ответить“The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. ...We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of. This is a logical result of the way in which our democratic society is organized. Vast numbers of human beings must cooperate in this manner if they are to live together as a smoothly functioning society. ...In almost every act of our daily lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons...who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind.” ― Edward Bernays, Propaganda
ОтветитьThe people of the Greater Middle East, including the Levant (most of whom are Semites, and the followers of Abrahamic religions) have been divided and ruled over by outsiders for centuries.
Because it is easier to divide people based on personal differences, than it is to unite them, based on what they have in common.
Strategically ambiguous outsiders make use of this, for own advantages. In the era of empires, first Rome/Constantinople, then during WW1 the seat of POWER playing these games changed to London/Paris (Sykes-Picot/Balfour Declaration/WW1), then after the 1950's as European colonialism's power decreased, starting around the time a bark by Washington DC in 1956 (Suez Crisis/War) showed who the new boss was, the role of divider was simply taken over by Washington DC (the entire ME was the playground during the Cold War). Now the intention is simply to avoid unity in the ME, in order to "rule" over the dissent which is classical divide-and-rule. Today, their leaders are ALL tools. Draw lines on the map without asking any of those affected. Exploit and foster endless wars, meddle for constant dissent.
Divide-and-rule connects the dots on the timeline of history.
Who has had (in all historical cases in the ME/Levant) the GEOGRAPHICAL ADVANTAGE of distance from the events resulting out of the own meddling and political activities, being able to reach all the other regions, but could not be reached itself as hegemony, at any given point of a historical timeline?
Pax Romana. Pax Britannica. Pax Americana. All the want is peace, and because they say so, but who picks up the pieces of great wealth and the systemic gains when all others can be avoided from uniting?
Different Empires. Different era. Same games...
-------------------------------------
The people of the Africa have been divided and ruled over by outsiders for centuries. Tribalism makes it easy to divide people, then keep them poor under the foot of exploitation. In the era of empires, first Rome/Constantinople in North Africa, then during the era of Western imperialism the seat of POWER playing these games changed to the USA/Europe, then after the 1950's as European colonialism's power decreased, Africa was the playground during the Cold War. Once the dividers had reached peak power for themselves, by simply drawing lines on the map without asking any of those affected (Congo Conference/1884) the own systems of gain could siphon off wealth like a giant vacuum cleaner. The intention was simply to avoid unity in Africa, in order to "rule" over the dissent which is classical "divide and rule". During the Cold War, Moscow took on the role of arming the resistance to the colonial dividers.
Today, all African dissenters, including some of Africa's own greedy corrupt leaders, are ALL tools. Endless wars, constant dissent.
Give the weak mind money, and they will dance for the outside dividers...
Divide and Rule.
Oldest trick in the book...
Different people and systems. Different places on the map. Same games.
--------------------------------------
The people of the Americas (most of whom are Christians), including the USA, have been divided and ruled over by outsiders for centuries. Because it is easier to divide people based on personal differences, than it is to unite them, based on what they have in common. In the beginning stages of era of European Imperialism, first Spain and Portugal entered the Americas, employing the divide and rule technique of top-down power on the local systems (Aztecs/Incas), then after 1900 as European colonial powers' influence decreased, the role of divider was simply taken over by Washington DC. As the own power increased incrementally, the entire world became the playground after around 1900.
Today, it is the globalists who employ imperialist tools to play divide and rule games on their neighbours.
Forget nukes. The "divide and rule/conquer"-strategy is the most powerful force on the planet, because it can be employed equally in times of peace, in times of crises on all tiers of power, and in times of war.
Ever since the two-faced snake slithered down that tree of unity (fable), speaking out of both sides of the mouth (lies, deceit), human beings have fruitlessly warned and have continuously been warned, against divisions within a peaceful status quo. Such divisions create GAIN for OUTSIDERS (Eden as a system divided by lies and deceit).
Now the intention is simply to avoid unity in the Americas, in order to rule over the dissent which is classical divide and rule.
Endless wars on anything and everything from "drugs" to "terror" (sic.), constant dissent with everything's a war war war...
Insert levers of lies, mistrust. The two-party-duopoly is two cheeks of the same butt...
Create favourites: Favouritism, by granting access to the own POWER/WEALTH, to those who volunteer to act as proxies and extensions for the own power projection.
Then point the systemic (MSM) finger, everywhere else, by use of the own paid stooges of power by presenting their deep state-orchestrated three-letter-agency astroturfed violence on multiple tiers as being the reactions of "the poor oppressed people, who need our help for freedom and democracy" (sic.). Liars, deceivers, creators of the BLACK LEGEND for the "other side".
In February 1948, George F. Kennan's Policy Planning Staff said: "[W]e have about 50% of the world's wealth but only 6.3% of its population. ... Our real task in the coming period is to devise a pattern of relationships which will permit us to maintain this position of disparity."
Kennan: A prototype GLOBALIST.
And that is what they did to increase their own wealth. Set up people against each other, then siphon off the wealth of entire regions of the planet.
And that is what you are fighting for. That is what the hegemon has always done, pretending to be the "good pax", but playing "good cop/bad cop" with the world, from a position of power.
In the past, the "good cops" were the INTERNATIONALISTS, and the "bad cops" were the IMPERIALISTS.
In the present that has morphed into the "good cops" being the GLOBALISTS/NEOLIBS, and the "bad cops" being the NEOCONS.
Name-branding and doublespeak for the slumberland plebs, enchanted by their "bread-and-circuses"-existences.
America's friends and self-proclaimed default rivals in Eurasia are still being burnt to ensure this disparity continues, with a (quote) "pattern of relations" which are beneficial to the own rule. Set up European and Eurasian nations (including the Middle East/North Africa) against each other. It is how divide-and-rule is implemented. The imperialist playbook of Great Britain and the USA for more than 100 years. Read Halford Mackinder (Pivot of History, 1904) and Zbigniew Brzezinski (Grand Chessboard, 1997) regarding Eurasia for the template. Read Smedley-Butler/War is a Racket for the modus operandi.
Divide and Rule.
The LINK of the WORLD.
Oldest trick in the book...
Four corners of the globe. Different cultures and religions. Same games.
---------------------------------------
The entire system they favor in the USA/collective West is based on a pre-set managed and moderated division, for the benefit of a very few at the top of the pyramids accompanied by the often-repeated nice-sounding storyline. Create the script for the own heroes. Their entire scripted money-funded history sounds like a Hollywood superhero movie that sounds too good to be true. Guess what? It is. It is what they are NOT telling you, that they try to hide.
Who wields the POWER? Who has had the GEOGRAPHICAL ADVANTAGE of being able to reach all the other little buck catchers (tools, and other Roman-era style instruments of POWER), but could not be reached itself, because of a geographical-, technological-, organizational-, military-, strategic-, political advantage at any given point of a historical timeline? Create the default rival/enemy on their own marching routes. It is usually the power most likely to succeed which is determined as the default rival/enemy. Notice how, as soon as a rival starts mass-producing products high up in the value chain of capitalism, and starts vying for markets, and becomes successful, it immediately becomes the systemic rival, and is then geopolitically encircled by the greater empire. It happened around 1900, as Germany started building high-value products, and it happened around 2000, as China started moving away from building cheap toys and labor intensive kitchen appliances...
The games start on the home turf. The first victims are their own people in the USA/collective West, locked in the eternal struggle for wealth and personal gain which they have been deceived into thinking is "good greed", but which WILL be exploited by the snakes who deceive them in the divide and rule technique of power. Because ..."most of the great problems we face are caused by politicians creating solutions to problems they created in the first place." - Walter E. Williams
War is a great divider. It goes straight through the heads of millions and billions of people from the very top tiers, right down to the individual level. War divides alignments and alliances, goes straight through organizations, divides political parties, tears through families, and finally at the very bottom tier, goes straight through individual hearts and minds as individuals struggle with themselves.
Im surprised 65% of people think we don't spend too much on the military
ОтветитьRyan McBeth's video "Exposing the Military Industrial Complex" is a good one on this subject. I sugest everyone watch it...
ОтветитьSo much gnawing and mashing of teeth when it came to Universal healthcare in the US. If you supported it, you were a communist, or socialist or both.
But let's go ahead and spend a trillion a year on the military - which is actually a form a corporate welfare!
Now you see why our dollar isn't backed by GOLD. We just print dollars and use our military as a threat for countries that don't use our dollar. Old news...
Ответитьand americans have the nerve to tell arab americans to go back to their country
Ответить