Комментарии:
Thank youu
ОтветитьI felt lost you when you brought purple as the last colour because I'm colour blind and can't distinguish it from blue.
You were rotating it to show that they aren't identical but they look exactly the SAME to me.
Good demonstration though!
Thissss is soooo gooooddd thank you soo much ….now i m very clear about chirality
ОтветитьNice
ОтветитьIt was exactly what i was searching for
Thank you👍🏻
Thank u so much I'm been searching for a long time to know what exactly chirality is . And thanks for using tetrahedral shape to explain it
ОтветитьThank you soo much I gott itt😃😃
ОтветитьWill u help me to understand some concepts
ОтветитьAllah saves You from all troubles
ОтветитьThankyou it gave me clarity
ОтветитьSo alphabet P should be achiral because by rotation we get same P
ОтветитьMy god, I think I've finally got it! Thank you so much for using actual 3D objects to explain this.
ОтветитьHii vedantu guys🖐️
ОтветитьThank you ! Very clear !
ОтветитьTwo compounds with same atom composition (that you showed with coloured balls) are not always each others reflection. The position where each atom is fitted matters. If the blue is on right it should be on left in the mirror image. So saying that "after rotating if its identical to original, its mirror image" is wrong. You could put a compound in a wrong orientation (hence not a reflection) but is exactly the same after being rotated 'a few times'.
Conclusion : just one complete rotation (exact opposite of reflection = original)makes a mirror image.
Tho you did put your compounds' reflections very mindfully to begin with (the right way)
Lydia my name is Cosme Souza, a brazilian chemistry student, and I'm really grateful to have come across your vídeos. Thanks to your clarifying explanations, especially about chirality. You literaĺy saved my life. God bless you. I'll stick to your vídeos from now on.
ОтветитьGood video NOSS IDENTICAL
ОтветитьSuperb Explanation Ma'am ! 🤩
ОтветитьFor the first time, it made sense to me. Thanks
ОтветитьIf an object has at least one axis of symmetry, it is achiral. Is this deduction right?
ОтветитьYou have a very beautiful voice and your explanation really helped me, thank you!
ОтветитьWell done!
ОтветитьThank you so so much
Ответить❤❤ma'am you're very beautiful 😍 😍😘 but also your experience in exploring the concept
ОтветитьIs this dp picture is your?
ОтветитьChi rho Cairo object? Ah its now Crystal Clear. Chiro means hand. Chi Rho is the Christogram for Christ and Cairo is the capital of Egypt. Which was built by hands so there ya go.
ОтветитьYou did so good at explaining it I got it right away.
ОтветитьNot sure if remember it right. But isn't an orange a lemon because of chirality?
ОтветитьReally good explanation. Could only be improved by focussing more on "yes it IS an accurate reflection, but NO IT'S NOT identical". Also I think there were 1 or 2 too many examples of identical objects. Thanks for your dedication in putting this together, Lydia. I now understand the concept! Beautiful accent by the way!
ОтветитьLegend
ОтветитьI love how u physically esplain it. It was very clear , thank u!
Ответитьgood
Ответить2 and 5 on a seven segment display. Or s piece and z piece from tetris.
ОтветитьSeriously thank you
Ответитьwhat motivated you t make the video? i love it haha
Ответитьthats good explaination toward you mam i lived in india in india is organic chemistry not done by great
ОтветитьYou saved me! Thank you so much
Ответить❤❤
ОтветитьThank u for this ❤
ОтветитьExactly what i was looking for, thank you so much for this great representation :)
ОтветитьTruly best and most practical way to explain. Loved it❤
Thankx
Best visual explanation
Ответитьok, ok, so when is it not identical to its reflection? Oh, ok, at last we see. What i read is that the body does not recognize substances that are racemic, for example, "canola" oil. Canola oil undergoes a transformation when heated, called racemization. And that makes the oil harmful, because of the chirality which the body does not recognize
ОтветитьThankyou so much
ОтветитьMarry me
ОтветитьThe only time I’ve understood chirality
ОтветитьTHANK YOU!!!! Close to being institutionalized from not understanding this concept - finally I get it! Thanks for making it super pedagogical and simple! <3
ОтветитьSorry if I am miles off here, because I like your style of explanation, but ... aren't you being very casual with the word reflection? I mean ... no object IS its reflection, but it's always identical to it (in a way) or its not actually its reflection . no?
Ответить