Karen Read Retrial Day 21: Re-enactment of Karen's Lexus Hitting John O'Keefe

Why would JOK even walk behind Karen's car if he was walking to the house?... He would be on the grass area and he would already be half way to the door by time she looked to see where he was. She would have to go half way into the yard to try and hit him and there would be tire marks in the grass( and to get traction in the snow so there would be skid marks) . She would have to get out look where he is and then back up or put in reverse look in back up camera to find him. It honestly doesn’t make a lick of sense what they are trying to accuse her of doing.

I think the expression you were trying to remember was If you can teach an old dog to fish, he will eat the chickens(when they hatch)(and have been counted)

His laser scan does NOT match up with the Video?
This Witness took a Laser scan of the Lexus without a Taillight?
This is Not at all Accurate?
He's TOGGLING HIS TESTIMONY FOR THE PROSECUTIONS NARRATIVE!
Holy Cow!
Nothing was damaged on the Taillight there either according to Welcher. Isn't this after she dropped John off?
He isn't a DNA Expert and did Not Collect nor Test Any DNA? How the hell can he reasonably Speculate to a Certainty as a Crash Dummy Accidentt Reconstruction Expert about any DNA that the Lexus hit John when Nobody even knows where John's Body was when there was No marked Crime Scene?
And what a jerk to put Autopsy photos up!
He also changed his own Data Analysis?

If he took Anatomy he would certainly know the human proportions to almost exactly where John's knee was?
Any Artist knows this!
There's even a trick we used to play using a tape measure and guessing the length of someone's arm by knowing their height?
Why was John's Shoe Untied?
I have seen pedestrian vs Vehicle and Pedestrian vs Train accidents. When knocked out of their shoes, the shoes remain tied and sometimes the feet are dislodged inside of the shoes!

Thank you Annieeleese love yourself podcasts❤

Why is Welcher Testifying that the DNA proves there was a collision? That is not his Expertise? Is Welcher listening to other Testimony?

This is horrible and should not have been admitted. I wonder how many times he had to roll around the car before he got that paint exactly like he wanted it. Law schools are going to use this for years to come as a what not to do.

Imo regarding the evidence...no car accident. Too much reasonable doubt.
Frame job. And CLEARLY, he was attacked by a dog too! Those Albert's are shady A.F.
Good job, Annie, we love you!❤

OMGosh!!!! 😱 Really??!! This explanation of dog bites and claw marks completely ridiculous!!!!

HORRIBLE REENACTMENT!!!!!

This is painful to watch.
They must think as we the viewers are absolute idiots.

DON'T BELIEVE HEAR...
HAlf OF WHAT YOU SEE...

THAT WAS BEFORE COMPUTERS AND MEN WITH 10 DEGREES OR THEY "ARE" STILL TAKEING THOSE Credentials as they're testifying "THAT THEY HAVE CURRENTLY"😅 THATS A CROOKED BUNCH OF SH-T!

Wow look at all the blinking & facial movements from Auntie Bev! She is a disgusting individual....& looking directly @ the jury. Jury tainting & taunting at it's finest!

Id like to know who paid for the dummy Lexus?

Wish you were in court rn AE.

I can't wait until tomorrow. The Commonwealth are grasping at straws and showing their ignorance and not tl mention BORING

What a lame argument posed by Brennan make no sense only proves he's corrupt. And the "Expert Witness" seems totally motivated to tailor his "facts" to satisfy the CW theory. Tho a disappointed DA means few if any future jobs. The 5am, Ring video of Karen exiting Johns garage, shows her tire tracks and scant am't of snow on John's SUV was too little to completely cover or hide his body.

I wonder if John’s mother already disliked Karen and is unable to perceive the truth due to her intense hatred for her.

They purchased a Lexus?

The reenactment is taking me OUT!! lmaoooooo these people are crazy, they really brought this to a televised trial. 🤦‍♀

Horrid reenactment! Why did he dress up like John? You can clearly see when the Lexus backed into him at just 2mph his body went INTO the Lexus impacting his SHOULDER area much harder than his arm that contacted the taillight. Bet his shoulder hurts lol If anything, his reenactment shows us how there would have been more damage caused to John's body with an impact at that angle going 22mph faster!!! Not to mention, there was NO testimony of force vs. mass!!! Awful analysis from an accident reconstructionist!

The state is literally running a circus 😂

Hopefully, the defense does an actual reenactment. More realistic to the evidence left on the body and car! This is ridiculous!

This guy is a joke. Soooo full of shit. I don’t believe none of his “tests”.

The evidence was compelling today. I won't lie. I've never said Karen is innocent. I have always thought she hit him (but was her hitting him enough to kill him? Or did Higgings find him hurt & finish him off?) I don't know? What I can say is that this reenactment, although staged, has solidified my opinion. She did him, be it unintentionally. She did hurt him & is guilty of that. But I think Higgings was also very responsible. I think he saw John hurt & used his plough to cover him up & left him for dead. I believe Karen should be found guilty of GBH. But higgings should be on trial also.

Ok? 🤔 The prosecution is making me feel that she didn’t do it… if she went in reverse 54 feet- 20 feet further back then where John’s body was found how would she not have hit the Jeep with the plow on the front that was in front of the house? Am I missing something? 🤔

I hate when they talk about crucial evidence when the jury is not in the room. Then prattle on mindlessly when the jury is in the room.If I were ajuror in this case, I would be pissed after, knowing all my time was wasted

OMG I JUST CRACKED THE CASE 🎆🎇🎆🎇🎆🎇🎆
The drink glass couldn’t have been in his right hand, which means his right arm wouldn’t have been bent, holding his drinking glass. WHYYYYY DO YOU ASK? Well because he was right handed and had his phone open texting Jen then locked his phone with the lock button. He would’ve had his phone in his right hand and his drinking glass in his left - which would’ve gave him time to put his phone in the back of his pocket, bring his arm up to the front and switch his drinking glass from the left to the right hand… IF HE DECIDED TO HAVE HIS PHONE IN HIS LEFT HAND AND HAD HIS DRINKING GLASS IN HIS RIGHT — he wouldn’t have been able to hit the lock button on his iPhone… because it’s on THE RIGHT HAND SIDE OF THE PHONE - HE COULDN’T REACH IT

Please put Alan in. I get bored before Alessi makes a point. 😩 And Aunt Bev cannot stand him - she sighs so loud !!

Did anyone else notice the diagram this guys displays.... shows the shoe NOT on the curb...

The diagram of the shoe doesn't line up with the curb. Something doesn't add up with his diagram of where evidence was found. ALSO he says so many things will effect the "side swipe" impact affect... WHATS THE RANGE DUDE. you should be able to give us approximate range. He's so general it sounds very unscientific