Комментарии:
So it has had fuel problems in its development history!!! was the refuelling unit that fueled the aircraft on the day seized for thorough examination and testing??.
ОтветитьI guess we'll (the general travelling public) just have to wait for the second 787 to drop outta the sky, and a few hundred more insignificant lives to end, before we get some real oversight... but hey, don't worry, FAA is just being meticulous - they just wanna confirm their suspicions... you know, better safe than sorry. Don't want to jeopardize corporate interests over a few lives, vise-a-vie 737, Carpe diem
ОтветитьOf course the FAA will not ground and inspect the 787s because everything the U.S. government says and does these days are corrupt and ultimately they care not about people but power over people and covering up their failures and the image of the USA and big business 😢‼️
ОтветитьThat's not a bombshell, it's an entirely appropriate and rational statement. Why on earth would they decide to ground a fleet of over 1000 aircraft when we still don't know exactly what happened, and the initial report hasn't even been released? That would cause international chaos without having any evidential rationale. So sick of media creators using this story for sensationalist headlines and misleading content, just to get clicks. It's whipping up unnecessary panic and makes it more difficult for people to pick out those stories that are actually relevant and important.
ОтветитьTill we hear about the findings of the air crash we will assume that it is act of God?
ОтветитьA Ram Air Turbine (RAT) is a small propeller-like device that provides emergency power in aircraft, typically deployed when the main engines fail. It converts the airflow from the aircraft's movement into electrical or hydraulic power, ensuring critical systems like flight controls remain operational. THERE IS VIDEO OF THIS RAT DEPLOYED UNDER THE FUSELAGE SECONDS PRIOR TO THE AIR INDIA 787 CRASH. THERE WAS A POWER FAILURE!!! THEY LOSE ENGINES. THEY LOST LIFT. IN MOMENTS THEY HIT THE GROUND. THAT'S THE BOMBSHELL
ОтветитьHEY..... the FORMER Boeing CEO earned 33 millions. AND THESE DISASTERS CARRY ON????
ОтветитьHow can we trust Boeing after all the tragedies that happened due to their fleet devastating failures?!
ОтветитьWe can all make our own decision as passengers. I will not be flying on Boeing 787 going forward.
ОтветитьThinkable
ОтветитьWasn't ''pilot error'' their excuse when the Max kept crashing, they openly claimed the pilots of the Ethiopian crash and the Indonesian crash were to blame, that they weren't ''up to standard'' [especially to the standard of US pilots as many were very very quick to claim] but surprise surprise, it was a fault OF THE PLANE ITSELF. I've never heard a single apology incidentally for maligning the reputations of those DEAD pilots.
Given the pilots of the Indian plane had a lot of logged hours and they knew almost immediately after take-off there was a problem I seriously doubt the issue was pilot error.
Making certain that the flights I'm booking for a couple of weeks time AREN'T on Boeing aircraft but Airbus instead. Don't want to end up without a son-in-law due to a plane crash. And it should be noted that plenty of other channels have recently been mentioning all the companies NOT buying Boeing - even before this crash - citing reasons such as bad fuel economy, short range compared to other makes, passenger comfort not being as good as on other planes, noise concerns with other makes being quieter for passengers and many of these are companies that, until now, have ONLY purchased Boeing planes for decades.
They are not willing to stop those flight for profits. As well eco loss and people complaint. They should have backup plans yet there is none I guess waste of money?
ОтветитьBring back the superjets of the fifties like Constellations, MD-11, L-1011 Tristar. Lockheed Martin was also a big manufacturer of commercial airlines of the forties and fifties.
ОтветитьPILÓTAHIBA?
Ответитьelqurták?
Ответить12 wasted minutes listening to statements of the blindingly fucking obvious!
ОтветитьThaank you and may all your flights be safe.
ОтветитьLe développement de la vidéo donne une vision exactement opposée à ce que laisse sous entendre le titre. Bravo vous commencez à devenir de "vrais journalistes" vous en prenez tous les tics et toutes les dérives . Je place votre chaîne dans "à éviter".
ОтветитьShould be immediately grounded until system malfunction is ruled out! We cannot repeat indiscretions of the past!
ОтветитьY’all go through TSA we put up with all that crap and then you produce airplanes that malfunction and do a lot more damage than any terrorist can do
ОтветитьSo far haven’t said anything, but I don’t already know but if bowling isn’t gonna make Safe plans I’m gonna find another way to get around. There has to be a better way.
ОтветитьNEVER fly on a Boeing unless your goal is a quick exit from the planet.
ОтветитьHOW does this company still exist?!
ОтветитьWhats the bombshell other than endless repetition spiked with ads
ОтветитьClick bait. Seemingly endless rehash of historic events without any substantive connection to anything. There is a reason we have black boxes on planes - primary so we don't have to listen to this drivel.
ОтветитьTook a week? Should be grounded and Boeing should be closed down. the use of non certified parts in construction of an airline is disgraceful
ОтветитьQual é a bomba rapaz...so lourotas
ОтветитьClickbait, folks. There is nothing but the effects to Boeing and the airlines. So what happened-- no answers here.
ОтветитьWhat is the "bombshell"? Clickbait
ОтветитьBoeings website says that the BPCU (Bus Power Control Unit) has redundancy if it fails, but we are obviously looking at a failure of the BPCU. And if it failed, it would stop providing power to the FDRs. So we may never know. Boeing already has the ACARS data so they may already know what happens if the BPCU isn’t well maintained. This aircraft relies on electricity to run critical systems and everything comes down to the BPCU which there is only one. Not multiple just 1 primary that feeds the other remote units. That is what top maintenance techs are discussing right now.
Ответитьclick bait
Ответитьwaste of time, nothing new here
ОтветитьTheir statements have made it abundantly clear that they will not take effective action in time to prevent another one. There will be another one and it won't be very long. Lose both engines during takeoff and that's it for all aboard barring a miracle survival.
Boeing needs to stop murdering whistleblowers and clean up its act.
"If it's Boeing, I'm not going!"
Shall the words of the whistle blowers be taken into consideration,,,or just ignored !?!!
ОтветитьSpring loaded ball shutoff valve under software control.. the only that can do both engines at once.. the only!@
Ответитьwhat kind os bombshell are you talking about !! nothing new here !
ОтветитьI cannot BELIEVE they havent GROUNDED ALL THE DREAMLINERS! Looking at Boeings recent history they arent very good at building 'reliable' new aircraft. Boeing are doing this as they are crapping themselves that in the 787 is found (like the 737 max) to be FAULTY its the END for Boeing! So they are risking lives by allowing the 787 to continue flying WITHOUT an FAA certificate of satisfaction that the aircraft is 'SAFE' - INCREDIBLE stupidity. Boeing needs to hope that no more PLUNGE into the ground. I am an Air Force aircraft engineer and I would NOT fly in a 737 Max OR a 787!
ОтветитьI can't believe some of your comments, do you have any background in aviation, the 787 is one of the safest well built aircraft ever. Fourteen years without an accident and over a billion passengers. As far as the 737 Max, I guess you idiots neglected to investigate what really happened. We in the US operated 8500 flights a day with 0 accidents. Look at the training we have vs the rest of the world. We are the only ones who require an ATP rating for all our airline pilots. The 2 crashes were in 3rd world nations no one would state the truth because they didn't want to be called racist. If the pilots were capable of flying, those two accidents would not have happened. It was much easier to blame the aircraft. If you’re going to make derogatory comments about Boeing perhaps you should do a little more research like picking up a poh or a maintenance manual at the very least. Based on some of your comments I doubt you could read them or understand what they say. Perhaps you should confine your comments to paper airplanes.
ОтветитьSo, it's has NOTHING to do with SAFETY or peoples lives, it's only about money and corporate image. I guess what really happened will actually be covered up!
ОтветитьAir India is a horse bleep airline, no maintenance, no general upkeep in the fuselage, etc etc , just like the Indian people overall, top 3 guys for Boeing over the last 15 years should all be in jail til they pass
ОтветитьNo BOMBSHELL there.
ОтветитьA.I. Goodbye.
ОтветитьBoeing company killing for years ......RIP
ОтветитьBoeing is a shitty company
ОтветитьJust another BS AI channel trying to make easy money. DELETED.
ОтветитьThis aircraft has had over 41,000 flight hours. That is a lot of flights in it's 11 year life.
Something catastrophic happened in it's final flight. What ever caused it has yet to be determined and it has to be something very unusual and unlikely.
AI voice generated, hm?
Ответитьcrap
Ответитьjust buy AIRBUS and move away from usa made junk. I hope Chinese COMAC comes on line soon to be viable competition to AirBus but no more Boeing flying coffins..please.
Ответить