Remarkable photo captures bullet midair near Trump's head

Does anyone believe a regular camera can capture a bullet in flight? You need special high speed cameras to capture the image.

There is a problem with this photo !! Watch the video in its entirety ....... You hear the gun shot through the " Mic " and at that point Trumps arm is not even " up " or in sight / above his shoulder. At the distance of the shooter ..... you hear the bullet snap TOO LATE ! Its gone...over with. Trumps hand was still on the podium when the shot rang out. So......in the photo showing the assumed bullet passing by....... and his arm / fingers up .......that bullet was 10 miles gone by already !!! This is basic logic !

OK folks, let's have a little refresher course on basic geometry
"The level path of the object indicates it does not line up with the shooter." FALSE. A slope of 20/450 would be pretty flat. It would produce an angle of arctan (20/450) or 2.5 degrees, a very flat angle.
"The path of the fragment does not line up with the top of the ear." FALSE. The cameraman is not at the same level as Trump's head. He is lookin up at a steep angle. What could that angle be? Well, if the bullet appears to line up two inches below the top of the ear, and his head is 6 inches wide, the angle would be arctan(2/6) or 18 degrees, which looks about right. The cameraman was looking up at an angle of 18 degrees.

Trump not releasing the medical reports is definitive. He would if it was a bullet. He would not if it was not.
In addition, there is the picture of the object streaking behind Trump's head. The streak is about three feet long, at most. So it is simple. The only question we need answered is "What is the Shutter speed of the camera that took that picture?"
If it was 1/1000 of a second, then the speed of the object was, distance / time, or 3 feet / (1/1000) second or 3,000 feet per second, which would indicate it was a bullet.
If it was 1/100 of a second, then the speed of the object was, distance / time, or 3 feet / (1/100) second or 300 feet per second, which would indicate it was a fragment.
A shutter speed of 1/100 of a second is much more typical than 1/1000 of a second, which would produce images that are too dim. The object was a fragment, not a bullet.

Wow. they deleted all the comments. Theres only 175 comments here now.

Not a bullet. Has to be shrapnel. Here's why: Let's assume this is NOT photo shopped. The AR rifle fires bullets at approximately 3000 feet/sec. The "bullet" is seen in the photo traveling the distance for as long as the camera shutter was open. If you look at the photo, this appears to be about one foot. That means the shutter speed would have to have been 1/3000 sec. This is way too fast for a normal photo. The shutter speed would normally be about 20 times longer. That means the bullet path would appear in the photo for about 20 feet. Even at 1/300 the bullet would show up traveling 10 feet in the picture. As further proof of this, look at the image of Trump himself. It is blurry. That means he was moving while the shutter was open. If the shutter speed was, indeed, 1/3000th of a second, his image would be very sharp indeed.

The initial video shows glare from a Trump poster held by a fan. This may easily be used and manipulated. when I first saw it it looked like smoke or mist flashing behind trump's head. But after looking at it 20 times it was clear that it was glare from the trump rally poster the blonde lady was holding in the back bleachers..

The angle and proximity are suspect and should be questioned

People are going ape shit cause "the bullet doesnt line up with the ear!!!" "The bullet looks like it was level with him!!!!" A. You can tell its not the shot that hit trumps ear cause trump is already putting his hand up and theres no way he wouldve been if the bullet was THAT close to him, he wouldnt have even been able to register having been shot nevermind bring his hand up. B. The cameraman had his camera angled slightly upwards, and the shooter being about 450 feet away wouldve only had to angle slightly downard because that warehouse wasnt very tall, so what do you get? Bullet path looks level.

It’s shrapnel. He was hit by shrapnel. Jesus. How stupid are we?

Why do some photos show like a hole in his jacket, like a bullet hole but others don't.

To those people discussing the angle of the bullet, the guy was hiding on a roof near it's edge, so not that high. And Trump was elevated on a podium. So probably roughly equal height. Remember the policeman has getting boosted up to see over the edge of the roof to check on the guy, when the guy pointed the rifle at the policeman, just before he shot Trump.

Yes, great, you have a photo...but has the bullet been recovered??

hmmmmm.. traveled level, yet fired from a downward angle...

Shot from an elevated position... Hmmmm, why does the bullet show like it was from a more level position, not elevated and shows below the ear? If the picture is even real!

This is BS! I have a 20 yr old version of Photoshop, and I could replicate this photo with bullet in about 10 minutes! That's about 1 foot of travel for the bullet and since a bullet fired from an AR-15 with a 16″ barrel travels at about 3,250 feet per second, he would have to be filming with shutter rate of 270 frames per second. That is not reality!

Dont be-lie-ve what you see on Tel-lie-vision

So was that bullet ever recovered? With so many people seated behind him, and the bullet coming down from a gunman situated on a roof, I have to wonder if that bullet hit one of the people who was injured or killed. This photo should give the investigators a sense of the trajectory, or using a laser to determine the trajectory may be possible also. It's hard to believe it didn't hit anybody else considering how tightly the people were sitting together behind him.

Something doesn't look right: The path of the bullet looks too low to wound the top of the ear; it would have wounded the BOTTOM of the ear. -- I wonder if the streak in the photo was caused by something else, such as a microscopic scratch on the camera lens. -- Furthermore, the path of the bullet looks almost parallel to the top of the lectern.

That's our President.

Whatever in the pictures didn't hit the upper part of the ear🤔

Since yt is deleting I try smaller comments:
PART 1:

"3 shots were fired. The picture was made as we could hear the second shot. By that it becomes impossible to capture the first and second shot on the picture. So the only possibility is to capture the third shot with the picture. But if that is the case then the sound must come after a specific delay. If that delay does not match then the picture must be wrong. This is what I calculated:

Distance: 400 feet

121.92m

Bulletspeed AR-15: 2800 feet/second

853.44m/s = 0.85344m/ms

Speed of sound: 343m/s

0.343m/ms

Time for the bullet to reach the target:

121.92m / 0.85344m/ms = 142.86ms

Time for the sound to reach the target:

121.92m / 0.343m/ms = 355.45ms"

This makes no sense. The only rational explanation keeping in mind the speed a bullet flies is that this was a very lucky picture; the man was just doing his job, taking pictures, and later on he realized his camera had captured the bullet AFTER hitting Trump's ear. There is no human way to hear a shot and, fast as you may react, take a photograph that captures that very same bullet. No way. Now, I wonder why he'd made up such a story, instead of just saying: "Well, I got lucky!"
I also wonder why he'd set up his camera with such a low ISO and such a high shutter speed (which should be required to capture a bullet flying) in a bright day, beautiful sunlight, and shooting (excuse me here) at a non-moving figure as is a person simply talking, a few feet away. No sense. No logic.

FBI Threat Assessor was sitting behind Trump. Lady with black hat, glasses. Janeen Digiuseppi.

Isn't there a news station or public person that was taking video of the speech - to examine frame by frame and find the bullet also?? Did the bullet come from facing or from behind?? Where does the water tower sit that may have had a person shooting from?

The photographer said he was getting the flag in with Trump and he finds the bullet shot. Where is the flag in the photo?

First you take away the dislike button now your taking away comments 😂 What's next?

So did the bullet come from the opposite side of the way he was looking. I though it came from the direction he was looking at, because every one looked that way when he went under?

As Indian we concern about democracy in America

DJT used byakugan

The vapour trail would continue throughout the whole frame. Any gun video demonstrating vapour trails had a trail that follows the bullet for 100’s of yards. Kind of odd how this trail dissipates a few inches behind the bullet, don’t ya think? I believe it’s more fake than real

Трампу рассекло верх уха , а пуля на этом фотошопе летит на уровне мочки .

Speaking as an experienced rifleman, I am amazed that nobody has spotted what this remarkable photo is telling us. That bullet vortex is almost parallel to Trumps head. There is a slight downward projection of the bullet vortex but it is no way consistent with a bullet fired from that height of elevated position at only 130 metres. It demonstrates a much shallower angle of incidence such as is created from a bullet fired 500 metres away, perhaps from the roof of the sportsclub which was closed to the public because it was a Saturday. I simply cannot believe that nobody seems to have remarked on this quite obvious anomaly.

Doesn't look like it came from a roof in a Downward angle though.
How strange🤔
I would very much like a reconstruction of the event, with a laserpointer or such showing the true angle, and compare to this picture.
I bet that this bullet in this picture was NOT coming from that roof.

Why do people believe The NY Times would photoshop this picture to help trump

My question is why the fuck was there no bullet proof glass in sight


Is the American government so poor that they can’t afford bulletproof glass

NOT REAL PHOTO SHOPPED

comment le tireur a t il su sur quel toit il doit monter, parce qu il y avait des tireurs professionnels pour proteger le president?
c est une nourriture pour une theorie de comment mener un coup d etat

Its called a razor

bullshit!! its photoshop

What a fake! Bullets travel at speeds >1200mph, so a camera is going to pick that up??? And wasn't the shooter on a roof? I don't care how far away that is; there still should be some slight downward angle to the bullet; and, if anything, this bullet's trajectory is angled slightly upwards. SO fake; likely like the entire incident. The likelihood of just being grazed in the ear and having this happen just before the RNC? I don't buy any of it.

Sorry got a few doubts, what flag was he taking photo's of and in that area were he said he took the shot there is communication Pylon yet no evidence in photo, and why did the sky change from grey to blue. Nice try in trying to dupe viewers.

did they edit blood on his hand?

Where is the glass photos? A teleprompter or Ipad would have been below him. You would have seen glass flying up hitting him. Analyze the blood spill by the podium! Thats fake prop blood.

Is the News real now

ABC news is MSM = garbage news.

Why is this clip full of bots?!?!

Psyop