Комментарии:
Anyone a great fan of Ferdinand Lassalle - a jew by the way? Unlike Marx who did everything in theory - Lassalle was indeed a politician and one of the first who raised a worker-union. He was infact the counterpart of the International character of communism. He was the one the Socialism for the workers must be arranged by the National State (a true National Socialism). This must be placed in a time 1860 where Germany was almost constant in war with France.
ОтветитьNobody "worships" Marx. Darwin was a racist, and modern biologists have improved tremendously on his work; does this make evolution by (among other mechanisms) natural selection false?
Ответить"To kill a man is not to protect a doctrine, but it is to kill a man." Sebastian Castellio
Ответить'Sir: We congratulate the American people upon your re-election by a large majority. If resistance to the Slave Power was the reserved watchword of your first election, the triumphant war cry of your re-election is Death to Slavery.' Marx, letter to The International Workingmen's Association 1864 Address of the International Working Men's Association to Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States of America Presented to U.S. Ambassador Charles Francis Adams January 28, 1865
Ответитьthis vid is full of shit
Ответитьyour full of shit aswell
ОтветитьI see semilarity, but Bush gradfather was helping Hitler, a lots of businessman from USA helped for Hitler. That was party of reach and Soviet party was terrorists as Stalin. They are criminals - thats who they are.
Ответить@tranmere789 Marx letter to Lincoln: "We congratulate the American people upon your re-election by a large majority. If resistance to the Slave Power was the reserved watchword of your first election, the triumphant war cry of your re-election is Death to Slavery. " Thomas Jefferson on the Native Americans: He believed that his govt was obliged to "now to pursue them to extermination, or drive them to new seats beyond our reach."
Ответить@tranmere789 It's funny to see black people defending Marx and Engels.
Ответить@FightMarxism It's *like* a religion? Well, it isn't. But so what if it is in some respects like religion - there are many great things in religion, are there not? But regardless, Marx was a humanist and not a bloodthirsty ideologue who wanted genocide. Let me explain it to you by means of a religious analogy (if that doesn't offend your enlightened sensibilities too much) - the Soviet Union was to Marx as the Crusades were to the teachings of Christ.
Ответить@FightMarxism Maybe if the West hadn't tried to bleed the revolution immediately after it happened dry by isolating Russia (whose "freedom" they had as a priority, huh!!), this would not have happened.
ОтветитьMarx wasnt a racist, this is a lie from nationalist idiots. He thinks that every human is and should be equal. He didnt want an genocide. He wanted an revolution, aslo stop talking shit abou the men who got the wish that everyone is equal!
Ответить@gamefreak1000000 No you aren't equal only because you make more money
Ответить@gamefreak1000000 or better...
ОтветитьThis is a slight unmeritable man, meet to be sent on errands: And, though others lay labours on this man, to ease ourselves of divers slanderous loads, he shall but bear them as the ass bears gold, to groan and sweat under the business, either led or driven, as they point him the way; and having brought their treasure where they will, then take they down his load and turn him off, like to the empty ass, to shake his ears and graze in commons.
ОтветитьCarl Marx and all his shitty ideas were worthless.There were and are more people who are intelligent then those stupid Carol Marx and others.Lenin himself was a terrorist during the 1900s.
Ответитьmarxism is nazism... hahahaha.... a way to save face? Snore & 1984Winston Ministry of Truth to the rescue.
ОтветитьThis is complete bullshit and is nothing more than fear-mongering.
Ответить@FightMarxism I'm not entirely convinced that you aren't a teeny weeny bit biased.
ОтветитьGreat Video! The truth for a change!
Ответить"State ownership of production is spurious socialism" Marx/Engels. Marx wanted to see the state disappear in this sense he was an anarchist, not a statist elitist.
ОтветитьThere is no such thing as a 'marxist country' these pseudo intellectuals should read some Marx, communism is a future worldwide society. And Lennin wasn't a marxist his beliefs; like the idea that an elite should bring about revolution in order to own the state/production contradict marxism which says 'the emancipation of workers must be the work of the workers themselves." and that "state ownership of industry is spurious socialism", the question you should as is; why are you being lied too?
ОтветитьThose quotes are not BS. Anyone can look them up.
Ответитьk there
Ответитьu mad
Ответитьoh god
ОтветитьObviously the downloader neder read Marx or Engel's. The USSR & China were Marxist in name only.
ОтветитьLol this documentary is pure bullshit western crap
ОтветитьIt's easy to see this kind of totalitarian arrogance in 2013 White House and Senate. Socialists must create a Right(fascist) strawman to attempt diversionary contrast. In actual fact, they're merely comparing themselves to themselves, mandating a polar opposite where there is none. There's only freedom or serfdom, failed collective or advancing enterprise.
Ответитьmy friend, if you are indeed so self,educated, I advise you make some more research before stumbling upon idiotic conclusions. I'm not going to even talk about your "far right=homophobia, genocide etc" rant, as it's not even worthy of discussion. But back to the point, in essence, national SOCIALISM and communism have very identical economic ideologies. You often hear Hitler talk about the German worker and the German farmer, the welfare system and the abolition of classes. However....(cont.)
Ответить(cnt.)... However, socially for example, National Socialism, as the name implies, was more focused on people of desirable ethnic background, in this case those of German ancestry, whilst in this particual topic Communism and Marxism was more lenient. I could write here almost all day about differences and similarities between the 2 doctrines. The point is, you can't paint everything black and white, or separate all in your own imaginary "left" and "right" baskets. things are much more complex
Ответить... but either way, these 2 ideologies I think have much in common since they both preach for birth of new man and for the glorification of The People, from worker to farmer to intellectual. Though, these similarities were obviously not enough, the proof is the bloody war it caused
ОтветитьThe racism of Marx and Engels is so well documented that this is not even any kind of issue. What is more unknown was that they despise working people too: "There are no bigger donkeys than these workers.... Look at our 'craftsmen'; Sad that world history should be be made with such people." - Karl Marx to Adolf Cluss (Letter, 20.Jul.1852) So they hated and despised all kind of "weakness" and "inferiority". Now wonder why Nazism and Communism evolved such criminal ideas.
ОтветитьThis is total and complete bollocks made by simpletons who are incapable of understanding complex theory and philosophy.
Ответитьthe Nazi's borrowed ideas from Karl Marx. Nazi is not original idea. Nazi is National Socialist. they are Left Wing. if they have won WWII they would have eventually evolved into Communism which is total control and ownership of everything. Karl Marx and Lenin both said Socialism leads to Communism.
Ответитьcue the storm wienies
ОтветитьWhat a load of shit. I mean, seriously, grow a brain.
ОтветитьNow I am in no place to deny or approve any claims made in this comment section but we must also think if this has anything to do with communists as a whole. I doubt that even any orthodox marxists believe that the basques, scots etc. should be killed and exterminated or that certain people are racial trash and shouldn’t exist.
Also, we must remember the göebells was a propogandist and at the time the USSR could very well pose a large threat to a new reich. That might be why he tried to push a narrative that they were both similar and therefore could cooperate
Yes, maybe the nazis had socialist elements to their ideology but their social doctrines were definitely not the same. The reich and the USSR were both totalitarian but in very different ways. The biggest difference being that the USSR totalitarianism was supposed to be a dictatorship for the proletariat that would eradicate the bourgeoisie and counter revolutioninaries whilst the nazi totalitarianism was supposed to be a dictatorship for aryans that would eradicate any other group of people that might oppose them
Americans really like to resimplify everything no matter if it's wrongs everything
ОтветитьBoth absolute shit hole countries
ОтветитьBLM founder stated they are “Marxist”.
ОтветитьShare button is gone.... Huh... How about that....
ОтветитьInsightful. I've been telling people for years how Marxism is tied into Nazism. Hopefully they can see how horrible all of this is.
Ответить¨It was Karl Marx who actually begun modern genocides. And the difference between leninism and nazism was very slight.
¨
is that supposed to be bad?
No way! Are you trying to make some kind of moral equivalency between National Socialist and Soviet Socialist! There's a huge difference! For one the words national and Soviet are two different words that mean completely things Im not sure what exactly.
ОтветитьThis is why we should Walkaway from Marxists
ОтветитьThe women in these documentary is a big lyer comparing bolshevik bloodsuckers to arian men. Well if according to her they "bos" wanted to create a "new men" who is doing all the wars and killings today? its not the "new men" created by adolf its the satanic people who own the world!
Ответить‘We must create the new man, in our new world and new order’
- Marx, Hitler, LGBTQ
Ah yes US is Marxism because US support Manifest Destiny
Ответить