Комментарии:
Bro can tell the future
ОтветитьWell well well
ОтветитьImagine this. But in a game full of brain dead fucktards.
ОтветитьHello warthunder, event sucks ass))
ОтветитьWonder how many trillion the government has spent on projects that are never even used
ОтветитьRussia Wins Simulator (Gaijin) made LOTAS crap in game lol. If LOTAS hit your tank IRL, your tank is getting flipped, cut in half or turret torn off.
Ответить"A distinct lack of tanks to shoot."
This idea aged poorly.
Some sources report differently on the range, it being greater than what was said here.
ОтветитьPenatrator? I hardly know her.
ОтветитьI would love to see the losat in war thunder tbh. If modelled correctly it'd be so funny
ОтветитьYears later we find out everything the soviet union said about its armor were lies and even our most basic AT weapons would have easily dealt with them. And because we engineered for what we THOUGHT they had, our current tech is now 20-30 years ahead of russias 😂
ОтветитьOverkill is underrated.
ОтветитьI really love videos like this. I came for the wt, stayed for the interesting prototype tech content.
ОтветитьIronically we've learned Soviet and later Russian ERA was largely ineffective. As opposed to the modernish NATO counterpart. This thing however is insane. Shame about its adoption.
ОтветитьThe HEAT version of the Maverick is an even better example of “brute force.”
ERA works well against small HEAT rounds but not so much when it’s a ~25cm diameter 60kg HEAT warhead.
I like your military history talks.
ОтветитьMeanwhile lost in war thunder: you hit a seam. Yeah nooo, it won’t pen. Noo noo.
ОтветитьThis would be ffective for Ukraine especially the flechette. They got plenty of systems/unte to shoot. I'm wondering if small arms fire could be used to cheapen shrapnel instead of building on the spot. Since drones are now ineffective against the turtle barns and jammers on top.
ОтветитьDi WT tidak begitu
ОтветитьUp for any Intell on "Can Opener" 👍👍
ОтветитьAt the end of the day, the US military and its hardware are as good as the cars that come out of the US. Shit.
If any other country had $34 trillion to spend, they would have outdone the US decades ago. The US cheats and still can’t do shit. Hence all the “narratives” to dodge reality.
Welp, these are Dinosaur tech now! Shahed-136 has changed all the things we knew about anti-tank ammunition!
ОтветитьWe should bring this back with self tracking misses
ОтветитьI thought "chemical effect" was a Chinese mistranslation for "explosive".
ОтветитьDid Spookston ever cover the ADATs?
ОтветитьSubnautica OST moment
ОтветитьAlways remember that one of the more effective anti-tank weapons is heavy artillery.
ОтветитьThank you 👌👌🔥🔥👍👍
ОтветитьJust waiting for the tos-1a in warthunder
ОтветитьI wonder how much damage they could do to caves and bunkers?
ОтветитьHas there ever been an antitank guided mortar? It would naturally be top attack and non LOS.
ОтветитьFuckin‘ ai voices..
ОтветитьHumvee losat is crazy
ОтветитьJust realized there's subnautica music in the background.
ОтветитьMinor point. Shells explode, shot doesn't. Thus HEAT shell and Armor Piercing Shot, like the 90mm T33.
ОтветитьAre you sure abut that happening from In the late stages of the Cold War``
ОтветитьLittle did we know that all we needed is a $500 quad copter drone.
ОтветитьDude. You're so bias
Ответитьunsubbing.. saw the pfp
ОтветитьThey invested heavily in in the generals pockets and instead of ERP got ERR - non-Explosive non-Reactive Rubber
ОтветитьShould've just used FPV drones
ОтветитьBRUH I’m literally on my break outside Martin Marietta and you mean to tell me the company I work for built the fuckin anti everything missile 😂😂😂😳
Ответить1. „ERA is especially effective against chemical effect rounds“ – wrong
2. „Shaped charges are chemical effect rounds“ – wrong
3. „the penetrator is formed when the warhead strikes the target“ - wrong
4. „Shaped charges nullify recoil“ - wrong
these days people who have no clue about a topic at all, ask an AI and just read that stuff?
Whatever it hits. It destroys
ОтветитьПочему ост из субнаутики?
ОтветитьKinetic rounds is not shaped charges...
ОтветитьBe nice if Gaijin modeled the flight path of the missile so it doesn't make a 90 degree angle into the ground if you so much as move you gunner sight a single pixel while firing.
ОтветитьI love how the Nato and the West have always developed weapons and capability's to defeat or counter what the Russians CLAIMED they had.
Thus by the time the Cold Ward ended with nobody realizing that the Russians where decades behind the west.
Not even the Russians know that, because they always oversold what they had, so naturally they assumed the west did the same, while we did in fact the opposite.
Remember Kids Nato tends to undersell their capability's hard.