The Most Overkill Anti-Tank Missile

The Most Overkill Anti-Tank Missile

Spookston

2 года назад

544,756 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@sam-bf4lt
@sam-bf4lt - 12.10.2023 00:47

Bro can tell the future

Ответить
@WirableCrown1
@WirableCrown1 - 12.10.2023 06:16

Well well well

Ответить
@_MIGGOOBER_
@_MIGGOOBER_ - 12.10.2023 21:19

Imagine this. But in a game full of brain dead fucktards.

Ответить
@xSkirmish
@xSkirmish - 13.10.2023 05:31

Hello warthunder, event sucks ass))

Ответить
@FBCxUNKNOWN
@FBCxUNKNOWN - 15.10.2023 20:41

Wonder how many trillion the government has spent on projects that are never even used

Ответить
@nagasako7
@nagasako7 - 31.10.2023 13:33

Russia Wins Simulator (Gaijin) made LOTAS crap in game lol. If LOTAS hit your tank IRL, your tank is getting flipped, cut in half or turret torn off.

Ответить
@chaz706
@chaz706 - 10.11.2023 03:01

"A distinct lack of tanks to shoot."

This idea aged poorly.

Ответить
@brbimatthemoon3873
@brbimatthemoon3873 - 20.11.2023 00:51

Some sources report differently on the range, it being greater than what was said here.

Ответить
@Man2quilla
@Man2quilla - 19.12.2023 05:22

Penatrator? I hardly know her.

Ответить
@Mega-on6xp
@Mega-on6xp - 05.01.2024 02:01

I would love to see the losat in war thunder tbh. If modelled correctly it'd be so funny

Ответить
@RhodesianSuperiority
@RhodesianSuperiority - 20.02.2024 01:26

Years later we find out everything the soviet union said about its armor were lies and even our most basic AT weapons would have easily dealt with them. And because we engineered for what we THOUGHT they had, our current tech is now 20-30 years ahead of russias 😂

Ответить
@Rockethead293
@Rockethead293 - 25.02.2024 02:20

Overkill is underrated.

Ответить
@Eristotle222
@Eristotle222 - 07.03.2024 18:55

I really love videos like this. I came for the wt, stayed for the interesting prototype tech content.

Ответить
@helmhamburgerhand
@helmhamburgerhand - 16.03.2024 04:02

Ironically we've learned Soviet and later Russian ERA was largely ineffective. As opposed to the modernish NATO counterpart. This thing however is insane. Shame about its adoption.

Ответить
@deltab9768
@deltab9768 - 16.04.2024 10:21

The HEAT version of the Maverick is an even better example of “brute force.”

ERA works well against small HEAT rounds but not so much when it’s a ~25cm diameter 60kg HEAT warhead.

Ответить
@MrWooaa
@MrWooaa - 26.04.2024 07:05

I like your military history talks.

Ответить
@Rynnakkosampyla
@Rynnakkosampyla - 26.04.2024 10:17

Meanwhile lost in war thunder: you hit a seam. Yeah nooo, it won’t pen. Noo noo.

Ответить
@TewaAya
@TewaAya - 29.04.2024 20:14

This would be ffective for Ukraine especially the flechette. They got plenty of systems/unte to shoot. I'm wondering if small arms fire could be used to cheapen shrapnel instead of building on the spot. Since drones are now ineffective against the turtle barns and jammers on top.

Ответить
@ouradeer6690
@ouradeer6690 - 30.04.2024 18:53

Di WT tidak begitu

Ответить
@michaelgautreaux3168
@michaelgautreaux3168 - 02.05.2024 21:26

Up for any Intell on "Can Opener" 👍👍

Ответить
@believein1
@believein1 - 02.05.2024 23:48

At the end of the day, the US military and its hardware are as good as the cars that come out of the US. Shit.

If any other country had $34 trillion to spend, they would have outdone the US decades ago. The US cheats and still can’t do shit. Hence all the “narratives” to dodge reality.

Ответить
@sslelgamal5206
@sslelgamal5206 - 04.05.2024 20:29

Welp, these are Dinosaur tech now! Shahed-136 has changed all the things we knew about anti-tank ammunition!

Ответить
@ianking.5721
@ianking.5721 - 05.05.2024 01:43

We should bring this back with self tracking misses

Ответить
@Alex4n3r
@Alex4n3r - 05.05.2024 05:08

I thought "chemical effect" was a Chinese mistranslation for "explosive".

Ответить
@Rolf-son-of-an-electrician
@Rolf-son-of-an-electrician - 05.05.2024 18:51

Did Spookston ever cover the ADATs?

Ответить
@thatfinnishguy6575
@thatfinnishguy6575 - 06.05.2024 00:26

Subnautica OST moment

Ответить
@raylast3873
@raylast3873 - 06.05.2024 04:31

Always remember that one of the more effective anti-tank weapons is heavy artillery.

Ответить
@sabercruiser.7053
@sabercruiser.7053 - 06.05.2024 20:03

Thank you 👌👌🔥🔥👍👍

Ответить
@dimitryrostov6482
@dimitryrostov6482 - 07.05.2024 13:39

Just waiting for the tos-1a in warthunder

Ответить
@Blackcloud_Garage
@Blackcloud_Garage - 07.05.2024 21:20

I wonder how much damage they could do to caves and bunkers?

Ответить
@0MoTheG
@0MoTheG - 10.05.2024 11:15

Has there ever been an antitank guided mortar? It would naturally be top attack and non LOS.

Ответить
@KendlickLama
@KendlickLama - 13.05.2024 04:08

Fuckin‘ ai voices..

Ответить
@Man2quilla
@Man2quilla - 16.05.2024 07:29

Humvee losat is crazy

Ответить
@lachlanhalliday5205
@lachlanhalliday5205 - 17.05.2024 08:16

Just realized there's subnautica music in the background.

Ответить
@michaelsnyder3871
@michaelsnyder3871 - 17.05.2024 21:40

Minor point. Shells explode, shot doesn't. Thus HEAT shell and Armor Piercing Shot, like the 90mm T33.

Ответить
@swedensy
@swedensy - 18.05.2024 11:55

Are you sure abut that happening from In the late stages of the Cold War``

Ответить
@paladin0654
@paladin0654 - 19.05.2024 05:24

Little did we know that all we needed is a $500 quad copter drone.

Ответить
@t2av159
@t2av159 - 20.05.2024 08:30

Dude. You're so bias

Ответить
@Leviathan_22
@Leviathan_22 - 23.05.2024 08:22

unsubbing.. saw the pfp

Ответить
@spool616
@spool616 - 23.05.2024 09:24

They invested heavily in in the generals pockets and instead of ERP got ERR - non-Explosive non-Reactive Rubber

Ответить
@VoltageLP
@VoltageLP - 24.05.2024 05:19

Should've just used FPV drones

Ответить
@italianbadass656
@italianbadass656 - 29.05.2024 23:13

BRUH I’m literally on my break outside Martin Marietta and you mean to tell me the company I work for built the fuckin anti everything missile 😂😂😂😳

Ответить
@ramongossler1726
@ramongossler1726 - 09.06.2024 23:02

1. „ERA is especially effective against chemical effect rounds“ – wrong
2. „Shaped charges are chemical effect rounds“ – wrong
3. „the penetrator is formed when the warhead strikes the target“ - wrong
4. „Shaped charges nullify recoil“ - wrong


these days people who have no clue about a topic at all, ask an AI and just read that stuff?

Ответить
@omkr0122
@omkr0122 - 17.06.2024 12:56

Whatever it hits. It destroys

Ответить
@dann1kid
@dann1kid - 21.06.2024 06:03

Почему ост из субнаутики?

Ответить
@johanfredin5153
@johanfredin5153 - 15.07.2024 18:45

Kinetic rounds is not shaped charges...

Ответить
@mostsacredstories
@mostsacredstories - 22.07.2024 01:28

Be nice if Gaijin modeled the flight path of the missile so it doesn't make a 90 degree angle into the ground if you so much as move you gunner sight a single pixel while firing.

Ответить
@TypausZuendorf
@TypausZuendorf - 13.08.2024 18:21

I love how the Nato and the West have always developed weapons and capability's to defeat or counter what the Russians CLAIMED they had.
Thus by the time the Cold Ward ended with nobody realizing that the Russians where decades behind the west.
Not even the Russians know that, because they always oversold what they had, so naturally they assumed the west did the same, while we did in fact the opposite.
Remember Kids Nato tends to undersell their capability's hard.

Ответить