m6board.com / gtboard.com; BMW M3 E92 vs BMW M6

m6board.com / gtboard.com; BMW M3 E92 vs BMW M6

GTBOARD.com

16 лет назад

119,545 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@xp3rth4x0r
@xp3rth4x0r - 31.03.2008 06:20

Zapust you're a fucking dumbass how old are you 3? i guess you know basic math. 414 < 507

Ответить
@tblack21
@tblack21 - 04.04.2008 19:49

The guys at m5board/m6board are nice enough to put these videos up which we would otherwise not see. How about a little respect? The M6 and M3 are quite close as far as performance figures go. I'm surprised there was such a discrepancy in straightline acceleration.

Ответить
@Chicainferna
@Chicainferna - 05.04.2008 06:21

C mon guys M3 has manual gearbox it will be much closer with new double clucth sequential,well it will never beat it but it will be much closer :( But i am still sure that M3 beats it around the track easily :)

Ответить
@gtboard
@gtboard - 05.04.2008 06:22

I agree. But an M3 will never take on an M6 in terms of straigh line acceleration.

Ответить
@gtboard
@gtboard - 05.04.2008 06:22

Thank you!

Ответить
@tblack21
@tblack21 - 05.04.2008 06:41

Good point. The M3's slalom speed is apparently unheard of. I'm not sure what it is exectly..... but it's f**king fast. That said, the M6 has my heart

Ответить
@sillyboy32
@sillyboy32 - 06.04.2008 05:12

yeah..it will be interesting to see what the double clutch does...the M6 is what like 40,000 USD more for straight line speed..not a better handling car??

Ответить
@tinusnel5442
@tinusnel5442 - 06.04.2008 22:38

M5/6board ROCKS!!!! Thank you for all these great vids guys!

Ответить
@gtboard
@gtboard - 07.04.2008 20:29

Thank you! Support the videos by ordering them on Amazon by searching for "gtboard".

Ответить
@gtboard
@gtboard - 07.04.2008 20:30

Haha classic.

Ответить
@gtboard
@gtboard - 07.04.2008 20:30

Agreed.

Ответить
@kenon7
@kenon7 - 10.04.2008 10:12

I'D LIKE TO SEE A GT-R

Ответить
@gtboard
@gtboard - 10.04.2008 19:18

LOL.

Ответить
@gtboard
@gtboard - 10.04.2008 19:18

Got it. I like to see you buy my DVD ;)

Ответить
@kenon7
@kenon7 - 10.04.2008 21:08

i did

Ответить
@gtboard
@gtboard - 10.04.2008 21:13

Thank you! Did you liek the first one? 2nd one is coming very soon :S

Ответить
@kenon7
@kenon7 - 10.04.2008 22:02

yea i'm loving it...keep them coming...!!

Ответить
@gtboard
@gtboard - 22.04.2008 03:32

No, stock. But I would say it was surprisngly fast, doid not loose too much to a S65 AMG we raced at one event this October.

Ответить
@gtboard
@gtboard - 22.04.2008 14:36

I would say DCT would win.

Ответить
@8MunchenBayern8
@8MunchenBayern8 - 03.05.2008 10:06

the driver of M3 is horrible

Ответить
@gtboard
@gtboard - 12.05.2008 01:57

He can drive and hte M6 is way faster.

Ответить
@vitocorleone57
@vitocorleone57 - 20.06.2008 02:01

hey gustav,90 hp difference,but also heavier,the m6 is.why is it so faster than m3 e92?

Ответить
@gtboard
@gtboard - 20.06.2008 02:06

507 HP, SMG, V10, Gearign etc.

Ответить
@albaraki
@albaraki - 13.08.2008 23:20

Strange, he's like racing Toyota Camry not M3.

Ответить
@thegurusx
@thegurusx - 27.08.2008 03:36

which one would u recommend between M3 & M6 in terms of drive quality and everyday handling ?

Ответить
@vitocorleone57
@vitocorleone57 - 25.09.2008 01:24

i wonder what the m6 do with the m3 e92 dct,sure the m6 will win,but by how much,this is the question :)

Ответить
@osbertintanu
@osbertintanu - 19.10.2008 20:09

BMW IS THE BEST !! m3 vs c63 c63 is like a garbage for m3 merc is sucks compared with BMW BMW is the best !!

Ответить
@MistaM5
@MistaM5 - 30.10.2008 22:33

Much of the similarity in low speed performance can be attributed to the M3's lighter weight. At higher speeds, the M V10 will no doubt leave the V8 behind, despite its still very respectable power output. The V10's continuous pull is hard to beat, especially at higher speeds. Doing the math, the M6 still comes out on top when comparing power to weight ratio, which explains why it walks away. I wonder if the M3 was a manual or the new Dual Clutch DKG transmission, that would make a difference.

Ответить
@maso070
@maso070 - 07.11.2008 02:17

the m6 has proved many times that it can pull 0-100 times of 4.0 seconds dead to 4.1 seconds depending on test conditions. BMW are deliberatley conservative about their numbers.

Ответить
@Hasanpisiko
@Hasanpisiko - 26.11.2008 02:07

jimmy has right the m6 is driving to 100 in 4.2 not faster ;). and the new m3 is sexyyy guy ;)

Ответить
@mconaboy
@mconaboy - 30.11.2008 09:29

Nice video, i am big m3 fan. I drove one not too long ago and ever since iv been saving my money.

Ответить
@borladyno
@borladyno - 16.12.2008 13:09

alright why compare a car that has over 600 hp to a car that has only 500 hp but one thing i know for sure is that bmw would waste the merc around the track no doubt thats just how good mpower is these days

Ответить
@LemtemPoktui
@LemtemPoktui - 05.01.2009 16:24

Yup, agree with you! BMW has the best handlings among all the german cars! Hail BMW!

Ответить
@nisdesignde
@nisdesignde - 06.01.2009 17:37

I guess you forgot cars like SL65 AMG or the new SL63 AMG... or CL 65 AMG?? Or the CLK DTM?? They are all faster from 0-60 if the M models are not using Launch Control. After 60 they will be all even, but no way an M6 is faster than a CLK DTM.

Ответить
@nisdesignde
@nisdesignde - 06.01.2009 17:38

lol? You forgot cars like CLK DTM, SL65 AMG and CL65 AMG.

Ответить
@moathus
@moathus - 10.01.2009 14:51

just for the record the m3 saloon is half a second faster than the gallardo spider on topgear track !!!! beeeeema is the best

Ответить
@nisdesignde
@nisdesignde - 11.01.2009 16:08

I'm talking about stock cars. Show me any BMW car that could smoke the Mercedes SLR. Even the SL65 is faster than any BMW. That is the TRUTH, it has nothing to to with me. I actually love the BMW M5 and M6, but since we're talking about acceleration and top speed, Mercedes has faster cars (SLR, SLR 722, CLK-DTM, SL63 AMG, SL65 AMG). And Stop rating this comment down, you guys just know what I said is true. M models are slow from 0-60 without using the Launch Control. Yes, 5-6 sec. is slow.

Ответить
@nisdesignde
@nisdesignde - 13.01.2009 15:40

what the heck

Ответить
@radost0514
@radost0514 - 27.01.2009 02:40

yes faster but how you comapre 6-7 liter vs 4-5 liter you can and Mercedes have even turbos

Ответить
@poll669
@poll669 - 22.02.2009 07:40

let dem have their fun if u had a fast expensive car ud probaly be doin this too hell id do dis with a crappy kar hahaha

Ответить
@tzontzoroiu
@tzontzoroiu - 23.02.2009 02:13

i own one and it's for sale

Ответить
@nikfish1
@nikfish1 - 03.03.2009 06:18

///M3 all day, any day

Ответить
@Terabass
@Terabass - 03.03.2009 16:43

M6 ftw

Ответить
@saddam2oo8
@saddam2oo8 - 13.03.2009 20:12

wow !

Ответить
@ahmadreal4ever
@ahmadreal4ever - 18.03.2009 23:26

i love mmmmm6666666666

Ответить
@soul996
@soul996 - 05.04.2009 17:22

but e55 can beat m5 but it cant beat m6

Ответить
@soul996
@soul996 - 05.04.2009 17:23

not true they hand made there own engines might use same technekes but not steal it the HAND MAKE IT

Ответить
@twinturbo1995
@twinturbo1995 - 28.04.2009 23:58

Hey you cant stay NA forever..I love bmw for the natural aspirated engines but i kinda like that their taking a new route and playing with turbos..135i is a good example..it can keep up with the e92 m3 at extrmely good pace..and it runs almost similar 0-60 times..so it actully works..reliabiliy isnt a huge issue as much as u think of it..its not like its gonna blow the next day lol

Ответить
@SaaLSeeRo0
@SaaLSeeRo0 - 30.09.2009 00:10

m6 mejor ke el m3

Ответить
@powellof
@powellof - 25.01.2010 13:14

SaaLSeeRo0Hola! no es que sea mejor ni peor, cada uno en su segmento, lo que pasa en son 507cv contra 420 entonces se nota la diferencia sin contar con la mayor cilindrada del M6 y con dos pucheros mas para tirar. un saludo

Ответить