Комментарии:
Geckos! Do we want MORE animated series? 😎
ОтветитьWithout knowing the details and just from the first understanding of PoS, it sounds like this could be used by any actor with enough money to burn to destabilise the currency by deliberately approving fraudulent transactions. If you were a large corporation or a state actor who has an interest in seeing cryptocurrency fail, they could exploit this.
ОтветитьKaspa
ОтветитьI know nothing about trading or Investing and I wanna get started. What are some strategies to get started with?
ОтветитьThis is why Etherium is a shit coin
ОтветитьThis video is DISINFORMATIVE.
ОтветитьThis is propaganda BS. He missed prof of work, study jason lowery
ОтветитьPow only consumes computer power I will go for Pos
ОтветитьMary and Jane huh?
ОтветитьFiat is superior to Crypto.
Banks control currency. Governments and companies lend from Banks. Governments and companies pay employees. Employees buy crypto and transact. Crypto miners buy hardware. Hardware company pays Bank with Fiat. The Bank will not accept payment in a form it does not have ownership of (i.e it must be in fiat).
You see how this is pointless?
And even if you replace the Bank with a Crypto Bank, you still have Centralization, be it with coin or in compute.
Fiat is the way. It is way, way less resource intensive than Crypto. Crypto is a humungous drain on the Grid for a service that is already provided.
How about Saito?
ОтветитьI don’t understand this quota that you said : “ Because bitcoin miners need to have the high-end computing hardware to verify transactions in bitcoin, this makes the mining prohibitively expensive and a lot of computing power is ironically centralised “ could you please explain ?
ОтветитьMrs Tessy is legit and her trading method works like magic I keep earning every single week with her new strategy...I appreciate mrs Tessy good customer service,my investment with her has changed everything about me
ОтветитьSatoshi plus consensus
ОтветитьPBFT
ОтветитьProof of work is not "slower" or less scalable than proof of stake. performance has nothing to do with the consensus algorithm. that was a big mistake.
Ответитьis there a proof of gecko?
ОтветитьWhat kind of token is FUN?
POW (Proof-of-Work)
POS (Proof-of-Stake)
“Proof of Power” - 50 percent Proof of Stake and 50 percent Proof of Work - is a provable hybrid solution to 51% Hash Attacks and the staking algorithm solves the two major theoretical issues undermining other Proof of Stake systems, “nothing at stake” and “weak subjectivity” by leveraging its smart transaction capabilities to remove any incentive to attempt cheating, making it a losing proposition. No specialized mining equipment is necessary to mine VRSC; VerusHash, a quantum secure hash algorithm that is near-equally mineable on both CPUs, GPUs and FPGAs.
ОтветитьGreat
Ответить🙂🙂🙂😍
Ответитьproof of work is the only way. bitcoin is easily scalable via second layer solutions like the lightning network. fear not, and don't get scammed by investing in shipcoins
ОтветитьProof of coverage for Helium
ОтветитьETH moving to PoS isn't good PoS. ADA Cardano is truly the most advanced PoS network you can get.
ОтветитьMuch too simplistic.
ОтветитьCan you please explain all of chain technology and use case and project name please
ОтветитьPOW is the more secure (and decentralized) option. It will have less of a negative connotation as it moves into more sustainably friendly sources.
ОтветитьPow 💪
ОтветитьWhat about kaspa? POW that base on graph of block instead of a chain. the result is that kaspa is the only crypto coin that is base on pow, real distributed and scalably
ОтветитьLet the free market decide which cryptos are the best, not governments or corporations
ОтветитьI'm hybrid. Mining one to buy the other.
ОтветитьPersonally I think POS is a little bit of a con unless it has something in place to guard against whale manipulation.. otherwise it's just the richest people being able to collude and take over a network. Yes this can kinda happen with pow, but it's much harder and more complicated.
ОтветитьPoW falls into the hands of the most powerful and wealthy as well, as mining difficulty increases, only the largest mining operations and pools can afford to continue mining.
ОтветитьPlease do a video on adaptive state sharing. 😁
ОтветитьOpinions ruin truth.
I hate when big companies try to get us to argue over a topic they think is opinionated and yet there is actually a logically truthful answer.
POS means, the rich get and stay richer.
Proof of work literally means to show your work ethic and score based off of that.
Harder workers and smarter workers get paid more......
That is literally the only acceptable answer.
Everything else is a opinionated piece and deserves no extra credit.
Team PoS
ОтветитьPOW
Ответить???
ОтветитьPOW - Whales
POS - Rich
🤷🏾
Anyone advocating for PROOFofSTAKE is either naive, ignorant or straight up foolish...
ОтветитьExamples of consensus mechanisms include nakamoto consensus, classical consensus and Avalanche consensus.
Examples of sybil defense mechanisms include proof of work and proof of stake.
Proof of Work. Otherwise my investment is going to be one giant paperweight
ОтветитьWhat about PoST? 🤔
ОтветитьProof of work/proof of stake are not consensus mechanisms. This is a misunderstanding commonly repeated by crypto enthusiasts. Proof of work/stake are in fact sybil defense mechanisms.
Bitcoin uses nakamoto consensus, which is that the longest chain is the correct chain. Proof of work is just the anti sybil mechanism that prevents network participants from producing blocks without proof that they control some economically valuable resource. In Bitcoin's case this economically valuable resource is compute power. For proof of stake networks the economically valuable resource they use to prevent sybil attacks is their own network token. This means that if you want to mint new coins you first have to have a stake in the network. While to mine new bitcoins you do not need have any stake in bitcoin - you simply need some compute power.
Pow for ever everyone who says something different need to take a look at the decentralized aspect of it. If it's pos it's mostly centralized AF that's why I love to see eth fail in there pos system. Mining for tha win.
ОтветитьPow of course
Ответить