Shaykh Uthman EXPLAINS Hadith Science To Bobby's Perspective in 5 MINUTES (Will I Accept?)

I myself just came to know about this chain of Sahih Hadith.

Ramadan Mubarak❤❤❤❤

Hallo Bobby, halte dich fern von diesen Hadithisten. Gott hat uns im Koran versichert, daß der Koran völlig ausreichend ist. Mit Lieben und ernst gemeinten brüderlichen Grüßen 😊

Mutawatir is logical its mass transmission it like china great wall of China exists.

Daaaaamn! We were taught hadith in school, but my arabic wasn't really good, nor was my attention in these subjects (dual syllabus muspim school, secular country)

If THAT is what it takes for a hadith to be sahih, then these are legit son! Subhaanallah

May Allah bless you brother .

The issue is did they remember all the sayings correctly. The Quran doesn’t say kill a person for leaving Islam a Hadith does.

Islamic scholars are very careful about narrations and narrator unlike Christian scholars

Hadith should not contradict with Quran by any means.

Uthman ketchup boy where are you, Christian Prince is waiting for you to debate him

Bobby inshaAllah may Allah make you âlim scholar in Islam for us muslims for your nation and for the west english speakers inshaAllah and make others accept Islam through you may Allah use you for the guidance. may Allah guide you and make you good among the muslims inshaAllah 🤲

I am shocked that Respected Sheikh Usman didn't explain Saqalain to you. Prophet MUHAMMAD PBUH didn't leave anything except Quran and his household for our guidance and said they would not leave each other until they meet him PBUH at Kausar. Respected Boby, I am aware through your introduction that you did independent research to find the truth. I would request you to do research on Saqalain, too. In Islam, we have no sects and have only Saqalain (Quran and Household of Prophet PBUH, those who aren't divided into any sects). Stay Blessed. Thank You.

I am happy that you revert to Islam. And, I've heard the news before. Greetings from Indonesia.

Did the Prophet S make these conditions? Where is the source for these conditions? Do the conditions guarantee anything? No

Sheikh Umari, for your information, a lot of hhadith has been trashed by your clan and a lot of ravis have been flagged as unreliable because they were going against your cult.

What does it matter if you know who the narrator is? A trustworthy narrator could have been dead for 100 years when a Hadith was compiled. You have no way of asking or knowing if they got the narration correct.

Even if we believe all these people in Hadith are genuine. And mean well. It doesn’t leave out the fact that they are people and people have notoriously flawed memories.

Hadith science is so deep that it puts historical science to shame regarding the amount of criterias required.

"Hadeet sciences are very accurate, people dont realized the hard work..."

Smells bad. I bet he pulled that out from his ass.

Even a biblical scholars say the bible still not at the same authenticity as sahih hadith

Subhan Allah, I had many questions when it comes to Hadith initially, but after I started studying the books of those narrators and the kind of lives they lived in order to preserve the Hadith subhannallah you can see that what they did was no joke. An interesting fact is that Al Bukhari started at a young age pursuing the knoweledge of Hadith, he soon became the prince of Hadith, and it was the people of iraq who gave him that name. How that happened is as follows: that the people of iraq (not sure if it was kufa but most probably it is) heard that the bukhari was visiting them, he was a famous narrator at that time and that was how they knew about him, so they decided to do a test for him when he arrived, they divided his Hadiths amongst themselves such that each person took 10 of his Hadiths then they randomly flipped the chain of narrators of the Hadiths. When bukhari came they stood in front of him and each person read the bunch of hadiths with flipped chains, bukhari said this is not my hadith, and this went on until the last person finished reading the last hadith. Now the shocking part comes, bukahri goes to the first person and tells him you said that 'someone said that someone said' until the end of it, he basically memorized all the twisted chains they made, and then he said 'the actual chain that I narrated was so and so' and this had them all shocked because they were trying to test if he'd notice that they played with his chain of narrators, but not only did he reject their narrations but also memorized the twisted chain and rebuked them by showing them what the actual chain was. That was how they named him the prince of Hadith. This is only a small story of his journey in Hadith and if you actual study his life and how worked very hard to collect Hadith I don't think you would feel the slightest doubt.

Is STONING allowed according Hadith? Coz according to Quran it’s clearly haram.

yes quran is perfect and clear
but our brain can not understand it well
thats why we need hadits for more understanding the quran

The concept of ahadatieth with its chains of narrators is nowhere to be find, only in islam. Imam Buchari for exemple was a genius. his conditions for excepting a hadith were very harsh. The science of hadith is something historians can't compete with - and is something we should be prould of.

Allah said in the Quraan ( إِنَّا نَحْنُ نَزَّلْنَا الذِّكْرَ وَإِنَّا لَهُ لَحَافِظُون) ( Indeed, it is We who sent down the Qur'an and indeed, We will be its guardian ) And Allah said ( قل أطيعوا الله وأطيعوا الرسول) ( Obey Allah and obey the Messenger) Then there is no way Allah will give us this command and not keep the Quraan and the Hadeeth not kept or not authentic . Be sure there is no contradiction in either Quraan or Hadeeth . Allah said (وَلَا تَقْفُ مَا لَيْسَ لَكَ بِهِ عِلْمٌ ۚ إِنَّ السَّمْعَ وَالْبَصَرَ وَالْفُؤَادَ كُلُّ أُولَٰئِكَ كَانَ عَنْهُ مَسْئُولً) ( And do not pursue that of which you have no knowledge. Indeed, the hearing, the sight and the heart - about all those [one] will be questioned.) this one speaks to who say things that they have no knowledge of (claiming that the Quraan or Hadeeth is not correct or wrong). May Allah bless you all ❤️

hilarious that someone can seriously think that judging something as subjective as a person's "good moral character" can be "very accurate", and worse, "scientific". Hadith so called "science" falls down right there.

🤣 since

The commentors are not commenting.but commending
Followers of islam are eell lied to like xtians.
These five are lies not in quran.
1.Allah is one true but he has a Spirit not known well in quran
That Spirit he blew into Mary ie from himself
2.mohamed met angel ga briel quote single cerse in quran none?
Based on hadith
3.mohamed was illiterate
False he could read and write
4.mohamed went to heaven brought 5 prayers .where in Quran
5.mohamed in lineage of ishmael so abraham, where in quran.?
In hadith he denied it
6 .where us shahadah in quran
7. Which verses says mohamed.brought shariah?
8.where do read mecca, medina holy cities?
9.where do we resf mohamed performed miracles
10.where it reads he split the moon?

Hadith written down 200 years after Muhammad. Biographies of people inside isnad chain were written after. If that doesnt ring alarm bells, you're all lost, or agents of a deeper force.

Don't fall for these false "scholars". Hadiths are not from Allah

The Hadith was written some 200 years after the death of prophet Mohamad. So you’re saying the authors could establish authenticity through the 5 conditions after 200 years?

Neal Robinson says: "In general, the Islamic heritage has been widely accepted by non-Muslim scholars.... This means that general Orientalists who specialise in Islamic studies say that this Islamic heritage is reliable in its transmission and has not been distorted."
[CHRIST IN ISLAM AND CHRISTIANITY, P 194]

Zasto

Beware of the Hadith….quite a few questionable “Sahihi” Hadiths….only takes a few minutes of research.

People were not only fabricating hadith, they were fabricating chains as well, which is why you can have contradicting sahih hadith.

Good moral character just means they sucked up to the Abbasids !

Hadith a science 😂

The only Hadith which is Sahih is Al Quran......Hadith books are followed by Secterian's who DO NOT believe Al Quran is Allah's ultimate guidance for mankind until the end of time .......why place your trust in hearsay??????

Haha wallah people like you got their ways to fool people. Almighty Allah has given us a brain to use. None of those 5 conditions, and I’ll give you 91048482020374392 more conditions because I’m generous, is “infallible”. Matter of fact, your first hadeeth book which btw was written 160 years after the prophet was gone, and tafseer says the prophet you believe in isn’t infallible, therefore they make mistakes. I know you can’t prove me wrong because your books couldn’t either. Plus the prophet didn’t order you to take from them. I highly suggest you sunnis who claims to be the people of sunnah to open your book yourself. Open Sahih Albokhari which what sunnis love to claim is THE MOST AUTHENTIC Sunni book and I swear by Allah you will go atheist or you might by god mercy see the true Islam by following the prophet Mohammed and his family “ahlu albait “

Religious fanaticism will make a logical person illogical. This is not a science this is delusion.

Bobby, as a rational intelligent man who converted to Islam would you marry away your 9-year-old daughter to a 55-year-old man?

So did you accept Hadith or not? Hadith should be taken as any other book and not word of God.

I suppose it’s good to know the 5 conditions but as a reasonable and logical person Bobby already knows deep down that it’s based on a human chain of people and we know that facts can get changed especially after hundreds of years ago

BOOGERS KNOWLEDGE AND WRITINGS THAT THE QURAN HAS FORBBIDEN IS WHAT IDIOTS PRESENT. WHAT A SHAME.

5 Minimum Conditions
1. Chain is connected
2. Every Narraratory has Good Memory
3. Every Narraratory has Good Moral character
4. Does not Contradict a stronger Hadith or Quran
5. No Textual defects (Grammatical error, etc.)