Комментарии:
The Blackhawk looks better.
ОтветитьSo why did they put the 10 mm in the SUPER Redhawk frame? Completely unnecessary. They're probably trying to use up those hideous frames. ( At least I hope.) Ruger makes outstanding revolvers, but the industrial design folks were standing behind the door when these shipped. (All Super RedHawks.)
ОтветитьSo if the cylinder were machined correctly, I assume the gun would be strong enough to handle 10mm Magnum?
ОтветитьWhats the point? 10mm is meant to give near magnum ballistics in an auto pistol. If in a revolver, just get a real magnum caliber.
And I like the 10mm, I own a Sig p220 Legion 10mm
I cannot imagine anything more pointless (stupid) than chambering a revolver for an auto cartridge.
The convenience of using moon clips combined with the smaller case capacity of an auto case.
Wow. What an advancement. Why not simply use a rimmed case, .357 or 41 and load it down?
I can go hunting with a spear too, but don't see the point in that either.
Nice Gun! Saw it at Cabela's & it felt Nice!! Gotta get that gun 4me!!
(∩ ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)⊃/̵͇̿̿/'̿̿ ̿ ̿̿¯̿̿¯̿̿💥💥💥🔊🎶👀👍🏼
Good Video!! 😶👏BRAVO!!
Will they just make rimmed 10mm and 40S&W already
ОтветитьPoor 'ol Super Redhawk. A very fine gun but UGLIER than sin. JUST my opinion fellas..... : )
ОтветитьThis gun is pointless. There isn't enough case capacity in two 10mm casings to stress a GP100 mush less a SRH...
Hell man, the SRH is overkill for the .44 Rem.
Some folks must be into the 10mm.
Ответить