Комментарии:
excellent presentation of the topic
ОтветитьGreat
ОтветитьChild, children and Chomsky??
ОтветитьQe Sociology Class 2024 says hello
ОтветитьWhy does the onommatopic represe3ntation of dog barking changes from language to language ?
ОтветитьHaha thats a v1 voice.
ОтветитьInteresting … but silly noises renders unlistenable !!!
ОтветитьEsta conferencia es una genialidad... Me ha dado la vuelta a años de reflexiones e intuiciones sobre el lenguaje, la inteligencia y las facultades humanas...
ОтветитьSuch an awesome class.
ОтветитьSoooo freakin' fascinating. What a strange species we are. Sometimes I think we deserve extinction, other times not so much... In my next life, I want to be Pinker's student. PS could have 'sung', not 'sang'.
ОтветитьI’m sorry but am I supposed to watch 50 min for my assignment!!!😢
ОтветитьYou are already legendary. You discussed with Fodor and Chomsky and demonstrated that human people have the necessity of speaking, like socializing
ОтветитьIt is not a random attribute, is a necessity
ОтветитьIt demonstrates that language is a necessity. Survival of the fittest 🐒
ОтветитьSorry, I’m very excited!!
ОтветитьI appreciate how the video description says reknowned linguist and at the top of the video the dr says " now im not a linguist". 😄😄😄
ОтветитьHe probably doesn’t know that all language started with the Sanskrit language whose alphabet is based on sounds that are fundamental.. We were given language. The problem is that many give talks on information which is not correct, not based on historical fact.
ОтветитьWhen he sighed to demonstrate Yiddish word I thought he actually got tired of talking :)
ОтветитьI took an introductory linguistics class in college. Huge auditorium with over 200 students. The professors was describing the difference between grammar and linguistics and he said, "Take not ending your sentence in a preposition. That comes from Latin. But there's nothing in Latin or any other language we should aspire to." [I was the huge nerd in the back who laughed causing the professor to explain how he accidentally ended his sentence in a preposition]. [I am, in fact, fun at parties, but not because of this]
Ответитьass
Ответитьпривет от детей мисис
ОтветитьSolitary confinement and non lethal weapons DO affect language
ОтветитьSteven Pinker is a non-thinker, he comes up with weird arguments, cringe philosophy and non-scientific shenanigans. But for some reason, he is heavily astroturfed by mainstream "intellectual circles". This guy didn't have any interesting or original idea since his conception. It is so bizzare.
ОтветитьMeritless meaningless mediocre mumbojumbo nothing more 🤷
As per usual from this propaganda channel
I used to follow Chomsky in my youth and incorporated many of his theoretical ideas (particularly universal grammar and innate language ability) - as well as other “classic” theories by modern linguists into my language acquisition R&D.
But he/they are wrong. I started to doubt his initial theories, ironically, because of his woolly & illogical (and ignorant) tirade against Israel and his pro-Palestinian rhetoric. If he’s so obviously wrong about Jewish/Palestinian issues then his theories might be equally dogmatic and unfounded on any solid facts or evidence.
My approach to language acquisition is in many ways contrary to theories of natural child acquisition, universal grammar, etc. And it shows, because the Rapid Method (which is more based on cognitive ways of thinking and remembering, plus the physiology of how sounds are produced, rather than linguistics) seems significantly more effective than the classic ways of learning a language.
Let’s just take the example of forming questions. This inversion only really applies in English (and even then it’s not always necessary). In Thai, a statement is “want coffee” (I want a coffee) and the question form is simply “want coffee [question?]” (This becomes understood as “Do you want a coffee?”) You simply add the verbal question mark (see Victor Borge’s Phonetic Punctuation) to the end of a sentence to change it into a question.
You can do the same in English: “You want a coffee?” just by changing the inflection at the end. “You want a coffee” is simply a statement.
French follows a similar pattern: “Tu veux un café” is the statement. But “Est-ce que tu veux un café?” Is the question. No inversion required (although you can do so if you want).
There is a logic (or series of pattern rules) in each language, and that seems to be fairly universal. But a child will seek these patterns out, often incorrectly (usually by mishearing what adults are saying, and often because they “re-interpret” what they hear into their own language system). You cannot teach a child (and often even an adult) how to say something correctly because they don’t acknowledge it subconsciously and almost immediately discard the corrected form because it doesn’t fit into their habitual mechanisms of understanding and speech. You can see this by how language is evolving before our eyes in real time. Teenagers or sub-cultures (especially with social media) invent new ways of expressing themselves, and these become the new language iteration for the next generation (and perhaps even described in the grammar books as the correct way to speak or write, LOL)!
😂
As for speech recognition, our brains seem to have an “inner ear” that recreates what we hear according to what we already know and based on our expectations. A bit like an analog-to-digital processor that fills in the gaps by guessing. The Rapid Method focuses on reading (out loud) long before embarking on listening skills - because one can’t really hear what people are saying unless one can produce the sounds oneself and already knows(or can guess) what is being said. The latter seems counter-intuitive, but you can test it yourself by watching a modern, indistinct movie with and without closed captions. You can hear what people are saying far more distinctly when you follow the closed captions.
Here is how I have been using my language in the first 10 min of this video: what a great amount of interesting information, accompanied by terrible sound effects. How annoying.
ОтветитьWell so far I think it's just a lot of words for the sake of a lot of words
Ответитьjesus is lord
Ответить🙏🙏🙏🙏
ОтветитьPinker throwing a bit of shade at Chomsky.
ОтветитьNever trust a zionist
ОтветитьHe Be working Vs he working 🤣 that’s where you lost me bud. Waste of time.
Ответитьthe last time I checked , African American dialect-he be working-we do not use to communicate he is working. I am African American- we say Yada yada he's employed. Are you referencing an episode from the Boondocks?!! Stop generalization!!
ОтветитьWhere could we find the studies Mr Pinker cites ! I'm interested in learing more !
ОтветитьThe daft sound effects are a bit annoying
ОтветитьHorrible attempt at sound effects
ОтветитьRobinson Amy Rodriguez Jessica Garcia Donald
Ответитьthe description says "renowned linguist and Harward Psychilogy Professor..." but he says himself he isn't a linguist.
ОтветитьTHANKS
FOR
BEING
PRESENT
AS
PRESENT
HEART FELT
❣❣❣❣❣❣❣❣❣
Colorless green ideas sleep furiously... Colorless (bland) green (new) ideas sleep (percolate in background mode) furiously (because the thinker is stressed out and trying to find an answer). While the initial sentence seems unmeaningful...It has a James Joyce/ Ulysses -esq deliberately precise and inscrutable flavor... just sayin.
Ответитьthe transcript original link doesn't work..:(
ОтветитьA quick comment on the "structure dependent rule" idea. Foreign people learning English do not automatically get this right. Other languages have different grammatical and logical structures which don't directly translate into English. Basing science on thinking without evidence does not always produce rational outputs. To claim that a human is born with an innate knowledge of grammar immediately spawns the question of "how"? Is there any evidence for DNA sequences that code for such a thing? Is there any explanation for why this "hard wiring" generates different rules depending on whether you are Chinese or Indian or English? Additionally, is there any evidence of this "hard wired" basic language emerging in humans who have grown up estranged from other humans during early childhood? Do Chomsky and Pinker believe that, if you brought up several babies together in the absence of speech, they would somehow develop their own language? What happens to the hearing babies of deaf parents?
It should be noted in assessing Chomsky's claims that he holds beliefs about consciousness being something more than a production of the human brain, also without evidence. Studying something ones whole life does not mean they are the oracles on that matter. After all, Kent Hovind and Ken Ham have studied religion all their lives and look what they come up with!
MICROWAVE RADIATION WARFARE.
In 2007, the Register reported that the pentagon was developing a parallel to planet earth with billions of individual nodes to reflect every man, woman and child on earth. This is called the sentient world simulation and it is is a neural network with massive computing power. It went live in 2007. Every node on the sentient world simulation is given an identifier which is called an Avator.
Elon Musk has stated that we are all collectively programming artificial intelligence. Google and all the humans that connect to it are one giant cybernetic collective, where we are plugged in as nodes on a network. It is a human machine interface which dials into all the other machines, computers and humans and also hooked into global positioning satellites and this is known as the internet of things. They are embodying all data and all knowledge into a working model. The cabal wish to be able to predict and control future events with this system.
Those who work for what is known as "The Blue Brain Project" are building a model for the brain where they are bringing all the information that they have ever accumulated on the brain and upload it into this environment and organise it. Then they will develop algorithms that connect all of this data. They will be able to understand how the brain builds a version of the world and then projects this version of the world outwards. They may be trying to recreate a collective consciousness. They can now plug us into the internet against our wills because they have injected most of us with nano technology which has formed networks inside our own brains which can be connected to the internet.
I am a targeted individual which means I have been implanted with both pre-programmed and programmable, injectable, self-assembling technology. Unknown remotely located criminals both collect and transmit data to that self-assembling technology which is inside both my body and brain. This results in me being forced to hear voice messages and to see artificially generated imagery and to feel sensations inside my body and on the surface of my skin in the form of pain, pulsing energy, other sensations which feels like human touch, attempts at remote sexual stimulation even though I am an old lady and non-sexual, external takeover of a selection of my muscles, brain to brain interface where some of the capabilities of my brain become suppressed and unknown remotely located criminal neuro operatives then take over those brain capabilities and act through me by speaking their words out of my mouth or laughing through my mouth or grimacing while using my facial muscles. These as yet unknown criminal neuro operatives force me to experience all of the above experiences and much more, too numerous to mention. I write a short paragraph about these unwanted experiences almost every day and I have been doing so for a many years and I then post this information online under my own name and address and eircode.
In today's post I wish to inform my readers that one of the abilities of those unknown criminals who remotely manipulate my body and brain is to strongly stimulate the nano technology in a part of my body so that I then by that means become hyper aware of that body part such as my right breast or similar. I don't like this being done to me at all. I am a fairly old lady who is non-sexual and this is quite annoying. I am only writing about it because the entire subject matter of being injected with self-assembling technology and then having that technology remotely stimulated by unknown remotely located criminals is a new topic for many people throughout the entire world. It is not being dealt with by the main stream media because they themselves have injectable technology inside their own brains and their brains are under external remote control. I don't know what they believe at this stage but I do know that they are no longer able to think independently and logically and they haven't done so for the past several decades.
Another aspect of being remotely stimulated and manipulated which seriously angers me is the constant remotely generated forced imagry that is being continually transmitted into my brain. Some of it is sexually degrading material and it does not come from my thought processes. I am very upset by it. This morning those unknown criminals who transmit messages into my brain were talking among themselves while I was being forced to hear their conversation inside my head. One of the ask the other if I had ever stolen money or anything. The other one responded that I had never stolen anything ever. Almost immediately a video of a bundle of money was transmitted inside my head and in that video my hand was pulling a note from the middle of that bundle of money. I don't know who created that video and transmitted it to me and I don't know if whoever created it was trying to imply to others that the video in question was taken from my memory banks but I can assure the reader that it did not come from my memory banks and instead it was falsefied imagery. This is simply one example of falsefied imagery which is constantly being transmitted to me in order to upset me and to misrepresent me to others who may be remote neural monitoring my thought processes from other locations.
As being a victim of remote neural monitoring combined with remote neural manipulation is a relatively new topic it is sometimes difficult to write about with total clarity. I speak and write the absolute truth at all times.
Those who imply that I and others are mentally disordered rather than being remote neural manipulated are holding back the whole process of solving this widespread and ever growing crime of non-consensual remote neural manipulation. Those who continue to imply that we are simply mentally disordered are doing the whole world an extreme disfavour and they are dragging us all down into enslavement. Do not allow them to get away with their lies. This is not a medical matter. It is a matter for the department of defence. The Department of Defence in each country must defend everyone against being remotely tortured by criminals who use digital signals to remotely torture us.
My name is Gretta Fahey and my postal address is Newbrook, Claremorris, Co. Mayo, Eircode F12 Y560, Republic of Ireland. My landline home telephone number is 094 9360901. Today's date is 11th October, 2024.
Please talk to whoever edited this video and added the annoying sound effects NOT to do it. Too loud and too annoying. Great content otherwise.
Ответить