Комментарии:
Smartest online debater vs dumbest PHD student.
ОтветитьThe diference, for whoever cares is of
Significant: which is the word, the leters the reference
Meaning: which is what the word refers to
Both conform the sign
(i used google trabslate im from argentina)
Postmoderns would say there is only significants, but either you are absolute bad faith or be very dumb to use it the way vaush uses it.
debate brained
ОтветитьSo wrong. on many levels. First, its not aqua, its AGUA across the border.
ОтветитьVaush listens to christopher hitchens speeches and touches himself. I'm convinced. What a clown.
ОтветитьThe smug look when he says “aqua” 😂😂
ОтветитьCross the borer and Chemestry is no longer existant...
ОтветитьThe ultimate example of pushing back on a completely uncontroversial point to avoid taking a perceived L and walking right into an even bigger L. Truly a master debater tactic.
ОтветитьThe bigger problem is that "you can't define it in absolutist terms, therefore it's not a thing" is completely fallacious. A thing doesn't need to fit inside an abstract box in order to exist. This is the same trick that progressives use to deconstruct race and gender, but could also be used to deny the existence of homo sapiens, or dogs, or almost anything in the natural world. It's not true and there is no utility in believing it is.
ОтветитьI present to you ladies, gents and those between/in-between vaush.......yes I was throughly unimpressed too after almost the hype.
Ответить“El Vaush” DESTROYS absurd claim that water is H2O
ОтветитьI find it hilarious that Vaush managed to get “agua” wrong despite the fact he clearly just googled it lmao
ОтветитьThe issue here is both this philosopher and you destiny both have a verbal IQ not high enough to overcome Vaush’s extra low IQ for comprehension.
HERE IS HOW YOU EXPLAIN IT TO HIM:
“NO, what I mean Vaush is that water, Aqua, whatever you label it refers to a material substance that was what it is even before these terms existed. Water was the same three atom molecule it is before we even were around to label it, it has always been the same chemical structure regardless of who labelled it what, correct Vaush?”
That’s how you spoon feed logic to a moron like this. Not by just repeating the term “H2O” over and over ffs
I feel like a watched this clip 5 times now somehow
ОтветитьSenior El-Vaush Agua cannot be beat
ОтветитьHe is drawing an analogy to the chromosome argument. He is saying the chemical makeup of water, H 2 O, is the true before we knew about chemistry and the elements that make up water.
ОтветитьThis is so relevant to today's political climate, it's not a diversion at all. Anyway, here's an interesting fact, if you cross the border to the south you'll realize that Destiny sigue siendo nombre de mujer
ОтветитьVoosh low key googled aqua-man
ОтветитьAgua 🦀🦀🦀
ОтветитьThis was probably the dumbest thing iv ever heard anyone use to win an argument
ОтветитьTypically when a word is DIRECTLY translated in another language, the definition remains the same. Couldn’t believe someone can be this dumb
ОтветитьFor thousands of years people defined the creator of the universe to be God, so vaush is saying it’s true by definition. Vaush confirmed Christian.. based
ОтветитьVaush is such a fraud 😒
He desperately needs confusion & fear to give his bullsh*t declarations any merit what so ever.
The Prof put his foot in his mouth by saying "H2O was the definition of water before we even knew about chemistry." He should have phrased it "Water was H2O before we even knew about chemistry." Not only is the prior wording technically incorrect, since definitions are provided by people and are not intrinsic facts themselves and are thus dependent on the concepts of the people making them, but the wording also gave the simpleton Vaush something he could latch onto without having to actually grapple with the point the Prof was trying to make.
ОтветитьMF was actually googling is water had H2O
ОтветитьThis video is pure anti depression. Every time. Without fail.
ОтветитьHe undermines his whole stupid point here. If these words don’t mean anything then trans women aren’t women.
Ответить“Are you ready for your philosophy lessons?”
Plato gulps
Leibniz breathes heavily
Wittgenstein nods nervously
Kant sighs
“Yes, Vaush" they say in unison
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Ответитьdoes anyone have vaushs version of this? i’d love to see his chat during this
Ответить