Destiny explains CRAZY langauge game from FAMOUS "water is not aqua" @Vaush debate

Destiny explains CRAZY langauge game from FAMOUS "water is not aqua" @Vaush debate

DGG Vault

1 год назад

16,208 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@TruthSpeaker723
@TruthSpeaker723 - 10.12.2022 17:26

Smartest online debater vs dumbest PHD student.

Ответить
@bleederboss
@bleederboss - 10.12.2022 17:31

The diference, for whoever cares is of
Significant: which is the word, the leters the reference
Meaning: which is what the word refers to
Both conform the sign
(i used google trabslate im from argentina)
Postmoderns would say there is only significants, but either you are absolute bad faith or be very dumb to use it the way vaush uses it.

Ответить
@travelerfinder7840
@travelerfinder7840 - 10.12.2022 17:39

debate brained

Ответить
@Padthai_Shrimp
@Padthai_Shrimp - 10.12.2022 18:00

So wrong. on many levels. First, its not aqua, its AGUA across the border.

Ответить
@jluzin
@jluzin - 10.12.2022 18:16

Vaush listens to christopher hitchens speeches and touches himself. I'm convinced. What a clown.

Ответить
@CamBoone
@CamBoone - 10.12.2022 18:24

The smug look when he says “aqua” 😂😂

Ответить
@metaverseb
@metaverseb - 10.12.2022 18:42

Cross the borer and Chemestry is no longer existant...

Ответить
@mjr_schneider
@mjr_schneider - 10.12.2022 20:04

The ultimate example of pushing back on a completely uncontroversial point to avoid taking a perceived L and walking right into an even bigger L. Truly a master debater tactic.

Ответить
@Nemophilist850
@Nemophilist850 - 10.12.2022 20:37

The bigger problem is that "you can't define it in absolutist terms, therefore it's not a thing" is completely fallacious. A thing doesn't need to fit inside an abstract box in order to exist. This is the same trick that progressives use to deconstruct race and gender, but could also be used to deny the existence of homo sapiens, or dogs, or almost anything in the natural world. It's not true and there is no utility in believing it is.

Ответить
@Vashthestampede967
@Vashthestampede967 - 10.12.2022 20:46

I present to you ladies, gents and those between/in-between vaush.......yes I was throughly unimpressed too after almost the hype.

Ответить
@jcnot9712
@jcnot9712 - 10.12.2022 23:25

“El Vaush” DESTROYS absurd claim that water is H2O

Ответить
@jcnot9712
@jcnot9712 - 10.12.2022 23:30

I find it hilarious that Vaush managed to get “agua” wrong despite the fact he clearly just googled it lmao

Ответить
@bawar112
@bawar112 - 10.12.2022 23:40

The issue here is both this philosopher and you destiny both have a verbal IQ not high enough to overcome Vaush’s extra low IQ for comprehension.
HERE IS HOW YOU EXPLAIN IT TO HIM:
“NO, what I mean Vaush is that water, Aqua, whatever you label it refers to a material substance that was what it is even before these terms existed. Water was the same three atom molecule it is before we even were around to label it, it has always been the same chemical structure regardless of who labelled it what, correct Vaush?”

That’s how you spoon feed logic to a moron like this. Not by just repeating the term “H2O” over and over ffs

Ответить
@joediditde
@joediditde - 11.12.2022 02:21

I feel like a watched this clip 5 times now somehow

Ответить
@sharkas9965
@sharkas9965 - 11.12.2022 04:33

Senior El-Vaush Agua cannot be beat

Ответить
@patmacrotch5611
@patmacrotch5611 - 11.12.2022 05:29

He is drawing an analogy to the chromosome argument. He is saying the chemical makeup of water, H 2 O, is the true before we knew about chemistry and the elements that make up water.

Ответить
@allanlomas5133
@allanlomas5133 - 11.12.2022 07:20

This is so relevant to today's political climate, it's not a diversion at all. Anyway, here's an interesting fact, if you cross the border to the south you'll realize that Destiny sigue siendo nombre de mujer

Ответить
@reignmack
@reignmack - 11.12.2022 09:53

Voosh low key googled aqua-man

Ответить
@matsab7930
@matsab7930 - 11.12.2022 12:02

Agua 🦀🦀🦀

Ответить
@rorynolan2322
@rorynolan2322 - 11.12.2022 12:41

This was probably the dumbest thing iv ever heard anyone use to win an argument

Ответить
@RV3G4
@RV3G4 - 11.12.2022 19:40

Typically when a word is DIRECTLY translated in another language, the definition remains the same. Couldn’t believe someone can be this dumb

Ответить
@eeyun5279
@eeyun5279 - 11.12.2022 22:21

For thousands of years people defined the creator of the universe to be God, so vaush is saying it’s true by definition. Vaush confirmed Christian.. based

Ответить
@marcmacaluso2795
@marcmacaluso2795 - 21.12.2022 22:48

Vaush is such a fraud 😒
He desperately needs confusion & fear to give his bullsh*t declarations any merit what so ever.

Ответить
@s0lid_sno0ks
@s0lid_sno0ks - 14.02.2023 00:34

The Prof put his foot in his mouth by saying "H2O was the definition of water before we even knew about chemistry." He should have phrased it "Water was H2O before we even knew about chemistry." Not only is the prior wording technically incorrect, since definitions are provided by people and are not intrinsic facts themselves and are thus dependent on the concepts of the people making them, but the wording also gave the simpleton Vaush something he could latch onto without having to actually grapple with the point the Prof was trying to make.

Ответить
@DMHR100
@DMHR100 - 01.05.2023 03:06

MF was actually googling is water had H2O

Ответить
@Donttalktomeifyoureabot
@Donttalktomeifyoureabot - 15.05.2023 09:16

This video is pure anti depression. Every time. Without fail.

Ответить
@makerstudios5456
@makerstudios5456 - 25.10.2023 16:22

He undermines his whole stupid point here. If these words don’t mean anything then trans women aren’t women.

Ответить
@pacific2313
@pacific2313 - 02.11.2023 23:23

“Are you ready for your philosophy lessons?”

Plato gulps

Leibniz breathes heavily

Wittgenstein nods nervously

Kant sighs

“Yes, Vaush" they say in unison

Ответить
@DaneAnderson-j4c
@DaneAnderson-j4c - 31.12.2023 03:43

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Ответить
@deagle2yadome696
@deagle2yadome696 - 01.08.2024 19:45

does anyone have vaushs version of this? i’d love to see his chat during this

Ответить