Комментарии:
I have opinions about Dr.Vervaeke's briliant project, but it is verbose mode of many replies, let me post it to my English blog^^
ОтветитьAmazing and novel [to me] insight after insight!
Ответить❤❤❤❤❤❤🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
ОтветитьPlease please put John and Karl in conversation, there would be fireworks 🎇🤩
ОтветитьVervaeke the thief!
There’s something so dirty and stupid that attracts the irrational apes to each other!
Planet of the irrational thief apes is planet of endless wonders!
Amaizing unfolding; might i suggest looking into how indigenous intelligence's forms of hyberobjectivty within the way it tends to anthromorize its essence within the language as a buffer between the emerging possibity space of the inferable logos.
The language "Nyanja" in Zambia is what I'm referring to.
Whitehead😊
ОтветитьThank you for a fascinating interview John
ОтветитьI wonder John if you have looked at Richard Watsons recent work
ОтветитьRosen would deeply agree about instantiating a model rather than having one!
ОтветитьGreat argument John !
ОтветитьIndeed, always a marvelous learning experience…thx again John for doing what you do.
ОтветитьLooks good
Ответитьthe three aspects of the "minimal phenomenal self" sound to me like three aspects arising with avydia in Buddhism: bhava, upadana, & ditthi, i.e. being, assumption (of me/mine/I am), and (wrong) view.
ОтветитьI really appreciate John's spirit of generosity and generosity of spirit.
ОтветитьGreat conversation! Thank you for sharingz
ОтветитьWe can change evolution or at least tweak it and I think that's what we're doing with meaning of life, which to me looks like being grateful to be alive. We've tweaked evolution by wearing glasses why not by realizing our true life has truth, meaning and a purpose.❤🙏❤️
Ответить