RUAF Storm Rozdol'ne | RUAF Launch ICBM Dummies Hitting Ukraine In Less Than 5 Minutes

RUAF Storm Rozdol'ne | RUAF Launch ICBM Dummies Hitting Ukraine In Less Than 5 Minutes

Weeb Union

21 час назад

82,736 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@Dwaldo1994
@Dwaldo1994 - 21.11.2024 19:03

These claims are being disputed with US officials saying it appears to be a new intermediate range ballistic missile.

Ответить
@johnvl6358
@johnvl6358 - 21.11.2024 19:11

😎

Ответить
@AXS512
@AXS512 - 21.11.2024 19:14

That missile can strike anywhere in Ukraine AND anywhere in the NATO EU states as well. Yeah,I'm talking to you Starmer and Macron.

Ответить
@idiotphd1046
@idiotphd1046 - 21.11.2024 19:26

If US can induce a larger conflict, they can implement Marshal Law and deny Trump inauguration.

Ответить
@PaulWolf-t2h
@PaulWolf-t2h - 21.11.2024 19:32

I guess the duds were meant to reinforce the nuclear war threats.

Ответить
@cosmepina6399
@cosmepina6399 - 21.11.2024 19:40

Excellent video today and very instructive

Ответить
@raymondsilveira1936
@raymondsilveira1936 - 21.11.2024 19:41

With the kinetic energy alone i fail to understand why they didnt used on the dams above Kyiv...the war has been going on too long enough for the we are brothers narrative to continue

Ответить
@mouradbelkas598
@mouradbelkas598 - 21.11.2024 19:43

Thank you. You used to make good, informative and meaningful videos, now thy are just guesses that are unrealistic and boring. Hope you review your content and go back to your much interesting and informative videos. Thank you

Ответить
@ahtgelditut488
@ahtgelditut488 - 21.11.2024 19:54

Por que no funcionan los subtítulos hoy?

Ответить
@charlesanderson533
@charlesanderson533 - 21.11.2024 20:01

I would say this is a true test of them, you have them sitting around for awhile, let's see if still works. But the next one?

Ответить
@Seadog..C5
@Seadog..C5 - 21.11.2024 20:15

Dud's? No conventional low yield.

Ответить
@iceman9678
@iceman9678 - 21.11.2024 20:17

If you believe that Russia blew up its own pipeline then is it possible that Ukraine ICBM themselves 🤔

Ответить
@joyaku3078
@joyaku3078 - 21.11.2024 20:18

great analysis👏🙏

Ответить
@Soundofwindonsand
@Soundofwindonsand - 21.11.2024 20:19

And now there's room in the warehouse for more Brand New Missiles
This is a pretty smart
"Russian Shovel"
Approach
How many Old missles does Russia have
The thought of a
"Tactical ICBM attack" never ever entered my thoughts
The letters were always associated with Immediate DEATH...as a child

Ответить
@lakukarikscha1417
@lakukarikscha1417 - 21.11.2024 20:24

100% there will never be nuclear war

Ответить
@r3dshed
@r3dshed - 21.11.2024 20:34

Hardened bunkers under Dnipro Yuzmash, the same as those in Azovstal, and used for NATO command - that was the kinetic strike target

Ответить
@AWZool
@AWZool - 21.11.2024 20:37

According to Scott Ritter and some ukie officials, it was a RS-26 "Rubezh" missile with a special MIRV warhead instead of the nuclear one - containing 6 packs of cluster munitions - that's the 6 "shotgun shots" that can be seen in the video - 1 missile, 6 reentry vehicle, each containing kinetic penetrators.

Ответить
@jusmeetsingh1907
@jusmeetsingh1907 - 21.11.2024 20:43

"West/ NATO has conducted long distance missile strikes on Russia itself !" That sentence is very heartening for Ukraine.. it clearly clarifies that Kherson, Zaporizhia, Donetsk, Luhansk are not parts of Russia itself. To top it all even Crimea is not being considered as a part of Russia "itself".
Talk about shooting oneself in the foot. ✌️😅❤

Ответить
@FrankReynolds-y1y
@FrankReynolds-y1y - 21.11.2024 20:50

Putin getting low on red paint

Ответить
@josemajano7325
@josemajano7325 - 21.11.2024 20:54

Keep strong Russia

Ответить
@supergogu2011
@supergogu2011 - 21.11.2024 20:59

Oh those flying shovels

Ответить
@iamtesting3824
@iamtesting3824 - 21.11.2024 21:06

people say redline but where is the red line ?
I can't see it
under the table ?

Ответить
@kevinwallace649
@kevinwallace649 - 21.11.2024 21:08

My question is why is Russia being so lenient? NATO is not holding back why is Russia.

Ответить
@MrDennisWay
@MrDennisWay - 21.11.2024 21:35

Eu ficaria feliz se o próximo destino de um desses fosse o Reino Unido

Ответить
@BigFoot-w4d
@BigFoot-w4d - 21.11.2024 21:44

The Americans insist this was a medium range missile attack not ICBM? Did they get it wrong. OR, was it an ICBM sophisticated that it completely escaped US military satellite monitoring system?

Ответить
@bernfrank3966
@bernfrank3966 - 21.11.2024 21:57

Thank you 👍🏻

Ответить
@brianrusher3617
@brianrusher3617 - 21.11.2024 21:59

RS 26 is a MIRV medium range ICBM capable of carrying 4 1megaton nuclear warheads in each rocket. It travels at over Mach 10. It can also carry conventional explosives and has a range of about 4,000 miles. Carrying duds, it was just a shot over Ukraine's bow and will likely contain conventional explosives next time and perhaps nukes if Ukraine can't take the hint. This is how nuclear conflicts can start because each next step taken by both sides can be escalatory. As Keir Starmer says, we must defend Ukraine even if it risks nuclear war. Some people might perceive that as an insane way to think.

Ответить
@meetmehalfway7982
@meetmehalfway7982 - 21.11.2024 22:02

Russia is a crying baby and the ICBM may as well be a baby rattle.

Ответить
@wolfgiesinger1597
@wolfgiesinger1597 - 21.11.2024 22:15

I cannot see how the salient south-west of Pokrovsk can be left in ukrainian hands in a long-term solution...

Ответить
@Slimedog1963
@Slimedog1963 - 21.11.2024 22:19

what you actually mean is...The US and UK have made direct attacks on Russia...NOT UKRAINE!!!

Ответить
@imrussian6638
@imrussian6638 - 21.11.2024 22:45

Кто сказал что Российские межконтинентальные баллистические ракеты не летают ? Пока что прилетели без ядерного заряда, и пока только по Okrain. не одну из них не смогли сбить, думаю кое кому стоит задуматься,

Ответить
@ENDERDARK0
@ENDERDARK0 - 21.11.2024 23:16

Perché i sottotitoli non si possono mettere in questo video?

Ответить
@평양시1
@평양시1 - 21.11.2024 23:22

"By using the newest long range systems on a mass scale, the leadership of Russia clearly shows that there will be no compromise and no freezing. Complete demilitarization, denazification (shut down of Nazi parties and internment of their leaders), Russian control of Eastern and Southern Ukraine from Kharkov to Odessa at a minimum, the rest of Ukraine is tightly saturated with Russian military bases and security organizations, a friendly government comes into power in Ukraine and pursues a policy of good neighborliness (no NATO, no large Ukrainian army). Only on such a condition we are ready to preserve a significant part of Ukraine as an independent state." - Director of Institute of National Crises Studies, Nikolai Sorokin.

Ответить
@dimasokolov8227
@dimasokolov8227 - 21.11.2024 23:41

It wasn't ICBM. Russians used "Oreshnik", new hypersonic IRBM

Ответить
@michaeltan9438
@michaeltan9438 - 21.11.2024 23:46

Vladimir Putin the Great, defender of the free world!

Ответить
@leithalghafiki
@leithalghafiki - 22.11.2024 00:13

please les sous titres in french please

Ответить
@GaryKennedy-g7p
@GaryKennedy-g7p - 22.11.2024 00:14

they weren't duds .... they were demonstrating the kinetic impact of hypersonic weapons. You don't need explosives with things travelling that fast ....

Ответить
@Lina_Antoniou
@Lina_Antoniou - 22.11.2024 00:14

That at the end looks like a final warning.

Ответить
@dpa5097
@dpa5097 - 22.11.2024 01:04

yeah, now imagine a world where NATO is free to stage IRBMs inside Ukraine - Russia would never allow nuclear weapons to be hidden in a country the size of Texas because a 300-second flight time is undetectable and unstoppable.

Ответить
@GarCo-bd3zh
@GarCo-bd3zh - 22.11.2024 01:32

Thats Oreshnik hypersonic MRBM mach 10/ 3.4kilometers per sec.

Ответить
@KonstantinVinnichenko
@KonstantinVinnichenko - 22.11.2024 02:11

The author clearly did not see Putin's official statement about the strike on the Dnieper. There were no faulty or unexploded warheads. There was a defeat of deeply buried targets, which naturally did not give a picture of an external explosion. There, the combat units (in which there is practically no fuel) arrived at a speed of 10M.

Ответить
@alejandromagno1100
@alejandromagno1100 - 22.11.2024 03:53

Zoom in closer, please, on the map when talking about each advance so we can get better idea what's at each location

Ответить
@jamesdavis3177
@jamesdavis3177 - 22.11.2024 03:59

looks like Russia has some cool weapons the west didn't know about !!

Ответить
@YankeeCommie
@YankeeCommie - 22.11.2024 04:36

Duds those strikes annihilated Ukraines largest production facilities completely the kinetic energy those hit with was incalcuable. Also showing the west just how unstoppable they are if those had their nuclear war heads would have destroyed the UK. If you dont know something just say it dont put incorrect information and if you just want to put everything in a pro Ukranian light just say its propaganda

Ответить
@c4me540
@c4me540 - 22.11.2024 04:38

Can AD intercept ICBM?

Ответить
@annapurna-c3v
@annapurna-c3v - 22.11.2024 04:40

Not an ICBM, but a ballistic missile. Huge difference. Stop spreading misinformation. Reported!

Ответить
@wind7bag68
@wind7bag68 - 22.11.2024 05:29

Trump: I'll stop the war
Biden: Watch this

Ответить
@234currency
@234currency - 22.11.2024 06:08

Experts advise they were not DUDS, went deeper and this video does not show explosions but there are other views that show explosions - turns out six main war heads that expanded to 36 according to Scott Ritter, former weapons inspector/military intel etc. - The War head was a bus for several war heads. It was a new missile, based on an older ICBM - this was an intermediate range. 1000 to 300 km distance.

Ответить
@kjererrt7804
@kjererrt7804 - 22.11.2024 09:18

we call it orbital bombardment

Ответить
@MarketwizardPF
@MarketwizardPF - 22.11.2024 12:20

Read somehwere that this ICBM/ballistic missile can be used as a carrier for multiple FAB's, anyone know if this is the case and which size and amount it can carry? If so there is no need at all for Russia to go nuclear, they can simply use heavy FAB's with this carrier system to get a similar effect and wipe Kiev of the map. Would not be surprised if this is the second thing that Putin is hinting on, if they keep escalating then they can escalate by doing this. He even mentioned that they will advise civilians in advance to leave the area. Imagine six FAB 5000's raining down on Kiev within 5 minutes after launch, together with a couple of more aimed at other major cities.

Ответить