Why You Keep Losing Money on Quantum Stocks

Why You Keep Losing Money on Quantum Stocks

Nanalyze

1 год назад

18,062 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@jaykrizzle
@jaykrizzle - 10.11.2023 21:53

D-Wave is mostly selling business services (proof of concepts etc) while their hardware and compliance environment scales/matures enough to be enterprise grade for high volume apps (e.g., mastercard fraud detection). Their customer list should be seen as a pipeline of prospects for companies that may (or may not) pay 500k-1M per year per individual production hybrid QC app.

Ответить
- 11.11.2023 04:49

Great video. Obviously, the blind bulls don't like it as they run towards a cliff. Not surprised they're mostly penny stocks headed eventually for reverse splits. Although IONQ is quite the humdinger of a roller coaster that's shockingly still above $10, seems to be a great example of the market being irrational a lot longer than someone can be solvent, lol.

Ответить
@nomennescio8443
@nomennescio8443 - 11.11.2023 07:53

Your quantum computing videos are always an absolute highlight, watching you rip these companies to shreds cracks me up to no end. Of course it was even funnier when valuations were 5-10x as high, depending on the company. You guys have been on the ball for this sector every step of the way going back years. Shorting is risky business, but now I know the next time I find myself laughing at the business model in one of your videos, I should start eyeing puts.

Ответить
@SavvyMoneyShow
@SavvyMoneyShow - 11.11.2023 12:54

Ionq tanked as well its just it had a huge run

Ответить
@maltlickytexas
@maltlickytexas - 11.11.2023 15:09

Very informative, as always.❤

Ответить
@Wildboy789789
@Wildboy789789 - 11.11.2023 23:33

ionq has a market cap over 1.5bil with 3mil revenue... compare that to redwires 150mil cap and 250mil revenue... i mean why even touch quantum at this lvl, a real company can dillute me 1000% and id still be in better shape lol

Ответить
@123slimgym
@123slimgym - 12.11.2023 03:06

rigetti spaghetti

Ответить
@davidbest8912
@davidbest8912 - 12.11.2023 23:30

Stories without numbers is a fairy tale. Numbers without stories is a spread sheet..

Ответить
@boratsmagadijev940
@boratsmagadijev940 - 08.12.2023 13:48

Its really amazing what people are willing to buy and what the reality is.
The first thing that comes to my mind is Munger quote: "Warren and I are looking for the easy job that we can identify."
Moonshots like these are really attractive from innovation perspective and in reality moonshot stocks are pretty much 99,99% land mines.
Keep up the good work Joe.

Ответить
@FishingReviewJunkie
@FishingReviewJunkie - 11.12.2023 09:59

I completely disagree on IONQ the rest of the stocks you mentioned are trash, ionq I definitely 1 million percent disagree for a multitude of reasons



Quantum computing isnt going to be this crazy magic sauce that solves unsolvable problems like it’s made out to be however, I see it as more of a tool to be added as a part of a normal supercomputer, like how most supercomputers have multiple types of architectures these days, x86, tensor cores, gpgpu parallel processing nodes, add some qbits and thats what i see for the future. And this video is incorrect. Quantum computers do not solve unsolveable problems, its just really good at doing what it does much faster than a traditional architecture ever could, solving some problems that could potentially take decades of runtime, but not impossible tasks.
The quantum computer will bring speed to cybersecurity, instant bank transactions, tracking crypto hackers when bitcoin is 300k, sorting through massive data downloads instantaneously with no wait time I picture quantum as a distributive network aimed at trying to circumvent these limitations of modern computers.

I can go on for its uses to advance solar energy and nuclear energy as well as quantum’s ability to mimic disease proteins to create more efficient vaccines my comment space is running out but I could go on for pages with hard use cases, it’s right around the corner
long is the best possible stock they build the computers and the Quibits, the technology quantum stocks selling firmware are bogus I want the guys who make the parts

Ответить
@davidcunningham2074
@davidcunningham2074 - 06.01.2024 11:17

A very good debunking of all this sci-fi magical thinking. keep up the good work.

Ответить
@als2cents679
@als2cents679 - 25.02.2024 04:18

Can you make a video about whether FORM can be a good Quantum Computing investment.

Ответить
@Leonardo-ql1qu
@Leonardo-ql1qu - 26.02.2024 14:12

Generic name: QUMPUTER - From now on, let's call them, and write, QUMPUTERS. Much better than the tongue twister 'Quantum Computers'!

Ответить
@eugeniustheodidactus8890
@eugeniustheodidactus8890 - 26.02.2024 19:06

Good stuff! Thank you. I can't even find an applicable definition of quantum that makes sense. Lol.

Ответить
@amitagarwal3854
@amitagarwal3854 - 03.03.2024 20:57

@nanalyze...the quantum stocks have all doubled in the past 3 months since you released this video. Where are your quantum bear videos now? People said the same thing about GPUS, GAI before they were built. You just have to wait and HODL. Yes it is a risk, but now people look back and wish they had held on to the Mag 7.

Ответить
@Righteousness-b5o
@Righteousness-b5o - 10.03.2024 02:38

arqit is easy to get, its just better encryption

Ответить
@George-f8h
@George-f8h - 19.03.2024 06:00

Joe, have you seen the special 60 minute did on quantum computers? They interviewed the head of research at IBM and Google. I think you will find the interviews interesting. I didn't know IBM installed a quantum computer at the Cleveland Clinic.

Ответить
@rafael1.720
@rafael1.720 - 08.04.2024 00:12

Maybe it’s better to look at PEG ratio as we are all in standby waiting to see which company will see GROWTH

Ответить
@ctp_snipecsgomoments7550
@ctp_snipecsgomoments7550 - 19.04.2024 14:21

I love my qubt. I will be holding.

Ответить
@jeanmader2302
@jeanmader2302 - 21.04.2024 15:33

I was watching a presentation about a quantum stock newsletter, free info, for buying something. I decided to end the long presentation, and as I pressed the bye bye button, a commercial immediately came on for HOW TO REMOVE STUCK POOP! LOLOL. How appropriate was that? There will be many changes, and many will shake out. Study, study, study.

Ответить
@paulking2039
@paulking2039 - 15.05.2024 06:02

Good info, but they said the same about Google, Apple, Nvidia, AMD, Amazon and even claiming the Internet is just a passing fad.
Louis Navellier who's worth 6billion claims the markets move in 3 year cycles for many stocks.
These and many stocks are for the back of the drawer, until their time comes to rise.

Ответить
@JLCX-mf9rv
@JLCX-mf9rv - 15.05.2024 19:15

At the end of the day I have read these comments…. Should I buy or no????

Ответить
@vizfact
@vizfact - 04.06.2024 13:06

Absolutely excellent upload.

Ответить
@timhowell6929
@timhowell6929 - 15.06.2024 21:46

Thank you for this excellent analysis… I’ve been casting about looking to find some investment opportunities in this space and have many of the same questions you have raised. I just subscribed to this channel. Thank you.

Ответить
@marcomarcello8746
@marcomarcello8746 - 19.06.2024 07:02

Thanks for the sound analysis that cuts through the hype. What do you think about the QTUM ETF?

Ответить
@leweezo33
@leweezo33 - 02.07.2024 00:18

Thanks Nana.. I wish I would have found you a couple years ago

Ответить
@Jesseg-rj6xf
@Jesseg-rj6xf - 09.07.2024 15:06

Need an update video on these 👍🏻🙏🏼

Ответить
@deepfnvalue8
@deepfnvalue8 - 21.07.2024 21:07

I was patient and finally bought at .70. I think a big rally is coming. Ray Dalio just said quantum computing will take over like the ai stocks have. He was talking about NVDA years ago. Hope you do an update video!

Ответить
@stevelamprou
@stevelamprou - 30.07.2024 13:09

You left out IBM. The true leader in the field and with no risk of going out of business. Rigetti is getting close to breakeven and D-Wave would probably follow breaking even for 2025. Not everyone would ofc survive from the early days of this new computing paradigm. But there would be a few unicorns, that's for sure.

Ответить
@EllyMoody
@EllyMoody - 07.09.2024 12:26

Because you shouldn't have bought it they are only losing money. It's for venture capitalists funds. Might take 20 years for individuals to make profit.

Ответить
@peterpalumbo1963
@peterpalumbo1963 - 13.10.2024 17:48

As to ionq using some of their cash to invest in other companies, they are focused on quantum computing not acquiring other companies. I say bully for them.

Ответить
@nk2012
@nk2012 - 28.10.2024 23:21

I wonder if you would have made the same scathing video against Nvdia during its infancy. QC is a speculative segment at the moment. What do you expect? If any start hitting (Revenue/NI) ... well then its trading at 30, 40 dollars per share. Unless one is wealthy or can leverage company funding... how can the ordinary investor "win"? The downside is the risk to lose it all. The upside is .. the next great tech side to side with AI.

Ответить
@nasseral-sabah1163
@nasseral-sabah1163 - 12.11.2024 07:10

Yr an idiot

Ответить