What is fusion ignition?

What is fusion ignition?

23,837 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@viktoro.ledenyov5829
@viktoro.ledenyov5829 - 12.04.2025 07:03

Super!!!❤❤❤Did you read the American best book titled: 'Swiss Firm Theories by Gnomes of Zurich" by Viktor O. Ledenyov and Dimitri O. Ledenyov ??!!!?? Buy and read it now !!! 🌸🌸🌸🌻🌻🌻🌼🌼🌼🌹🌹🌹🌹🌺🌺🌺🪻🪻🪻🌷🌷🌷🪷🪷🪷💮💮💮🏵️🏵️🏵️🏵️🥀🥀🥀⌚⌚⌚⌚💼💼💼🇨🇭🇨🇭🇨🇭🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🗽🗽🗽

Ответить
@ValidatingUsername
@ValidatingUsername - 11.04.2025 20:11

They should make a cylindrical chamber (horizontally) with plasma confinement grade magnets on the entire surface with lasers coming in each end and the pellets dropping in from a hole on the top (horizontal side wall) and the energy released out of a hole in the bottom (horizontal side wall) onto a heat exchanger and pellet ash collection system 🧐🤔😉🫡

Ответить
@spiroskatsikas
@spiroskatsikas - 10.04.2025 11:03

This is very very dangerous, close to splitting atoms ,the end of man is near science has got dangerous 😳 and the scientists know it but to egar, 😢😢

Ответить
@mikemurphy5898
@mikemurphy5898 - 05.04.2025 12:39

These videos are excellent

Ответить
@praveenjoshwa2782
@praveenjoshwa2782 - 07.03.2025 07:45

More interesting and useful.... What will you do for radiation emission and any precautions? any scintillator detector?

Ответить
@trebormints3739
@trebormints3739 - 31.01.2025 22:24

I hope Elon doesnt see this ,He'll end up building a flipping impulse drive or something.

Ответить
@CUAUHTEMOCVEGATORRES
@CUAUHTEMOCVEGATORRES - 20.01.2025 04:44

Is it that hard to reverse engineer a nuclear fusion core from a UFO?

Ответить
@Dethrey_
@Dethrey_ - 22.12.2024 06:29

2 MJ in and they got 3MJ out? absolutely incredible yall ,hats off 👏

Ответить
@stevenlaube7535
@stevenlaube7535 - 20.12.2024 09:01

gravity waves were ?

Ответить
@stevenlaube7535
@stevenlaube7535 - 20.12.2024 08:51

f=ma

Ответить
@thoriummarcell403
@thoriummarcell403 - 04.10.2024 17:28

1300 MJ of chemical energy was converted in conventional coal powerplants and transmitted so 400 MJ electric energy can produce 1.9 MJ laser light energy to DESTROY a million dollar target and gain +1.26 MJ unusable heat in the rubble mass (roughly 0.08 kg of wood gives same amount of energy when burnt, except in a usable form; Fission also works extremely reliably and produces 0.00000005 kg / kWh products, mostly usable and actually precious; Fission produces 40..100 times less decomissioning waste and total radiactive waste for every TWh energy produced if the fusion succeeds at all - with the most optimistic fusion resource numbers)... Forgetting about the facts sounds like misinformation, or "Scientists are confusing the policymakers and the public" as Sabine Hossenfelder put it. Please stop misinformation because it is a crime and extremely harmful to mankind. Please include the basic facts about the energy actually used up and the potential feasible paths ahead.

Ответить
@MR1BOSTON
@MR1BOSTON - 07.08.2024 09:47

I feel i have invented a way to kill cancer cells as well as end aging. I would love to work with some brilliant minds. You have proven your brilliance. Whom do I speak with to accomplish this?

Ответить
@Dra741
@Dra741 - 04.08.2024 05:51

Twenty billion of the second we were able to confirm Fusion reaction and this was the intention and the development of the March lover laboratory was to confirm. That's all you have to do in the first step. Fusion, you can get more energy out of it than you put into it and I. Calculated an estimated would take 5 years. In exactly how long it took, we have complimentation, a fusion.
But currently we still have to use our.
Black clothes, black gold set under our feet. Trump showed us if we used it. We will make this transition bread and butt. Anyone in the world every country in the world will have their gas prices cut by 50%.
The environment is going to continue to change its going to change in places where you don't expect it. Oasis will become desert and suddenly Weaks. But we must have our oil production up to the scale.
That we could deal with the changes in temperature. We already seen so when comes with destroyed by the green new deal. It left the country immediately Impoverished, it destroyed the government and the food production of the country. So why should we do it

Ответить
@Dra741
@Dra741 - 04.08.2024 05:48

Nuclear deterrence only works when you have countries that half nuclear weapons that follow the rules of law of having them. It doesn't work with people that are terrorist countries and organizations. It will use it as soon as they get it. They will use it for black & white the torrents. And what worked with the Soviet Union? And when in collapse, then everything is not gonna work with the terrorists. It's not going to work. They will one of them will take a nuclear bomb and blow up an entire city and won't even realize why he did it. That's how dangerous it is. Trump said ministration had Iran what they were ready to get out of and they realized that I already has realized. We had to get out of this nucleus stuff because we're gonna become the entire country on nuclear. We're terrible with support and terrorism overwhelming who's gonna get it first

Ответить
@Dra741
@Dra741 - 04.08.2024 05:47

Lawrence livermore laboratory Because they were able to grow their own crystals. Past, the laser light through day were able to create the most powerful laces on Earth.

Ответить
@Dra741
@Dra741 - 04.08.2024 05:44

The problem with the future people and the people they have control of nuclear weapons is I don't understand the use of a nuclear weapon. They don't understand the terms the future people that have nuclear weapons do not understand that these weapons must be controlled on the specific conditions. They don't understand them, and that's the part that you're missing, no play a deterrence will not work in this environment because you're adversaries, do not even understand the significance the danger of having a nuclear weapon if you have a nuclear weapon in your country, you are immediately unnuclear they don't understand this. You can't deter the type of attack that America and the entire world is under right now you have to respond to an actively, you cannot say what time is it frightened? The enemies of the United States to follow the rules and regulations under the nuclear regulatory commission International possession and use of nuclear weapons, they don't follow this doctrine, just why don't grateful? President Trump was gonna take office because we have to he had everything going perfectly are nuclear advasors service. We're willing to give up their nuclear weapons, but for financial benefit and benefit of the society. gonna current doctrine of the marxism, and the

Ответить
@Dra741
@Dra741 - 04.08.2024 05:39

Fusion is the future of American energy production.
Everything environmentalists want confusion. We get no radioactive materials. No possibility for catastrophic nuclear failure. Fusion is the future of America and Lawrence livemole project. What's the most comprehensive? An excellently executed research and development for confirming Fusion is possible a 196 beams of ultraviolet X-ray. Energy was focused at the hollow Ram. The only problem with the hollow Ram is that it did not Newton's, because the containment field, they didn't have a containment for it. They poured all of that energy into one area, but there was nothing to contain the other particles that are created in this environment. And that's why we have the neutrons and protons and everything Going Out of control and everything. But we learned this we can contain.
Effusion reaction the fusion reactor quid by the large level laboratory shoulders and 20 billions of a second that fusion works add. The company's art developing.
Fusion raptors and compact fusion raptors. My calculations for quite accurate cause. I's realized that we will confront nuclear fusion and less than 5 years and we're achieved.
But currently we still have to rely on our fossil fuels. We cannot allow this Kung palamaret of the world. Economic setup takeaway the most important material that we need to develop the energy to even build the fusion reactor their policies and ideologies strategically weaken every country in the world. Are they already proved this?

Ответить
@anubisplays1421
@anubisplays1421 - 12.05.2024 19:34

Just grift to get more funding, hehe.

Ответить
@vernonbrechin4207
@vernonbrechin4207 - 05.05.2024 22:30

Most nuclear fusion energy pitches are greatly over-hyped, concentrating on the hoped for results while leaving out mention of the numerous problems that have been encountered since the efforts began in the 1950s. Scores of nuclear physicist and engineers have spent decades working on the elusive goal only to retire to see we are still many decades away from a major breakthrough to a seeing a practical nuclear fusion demonstration facility. Many of the pitches are intended to generate public interest and attract private investors to fund these extremely expensive projects that number well over a dozen.

The National Ignition Facility (NIF) has always been primarily funded as the thermonuclear weapon (H-bomb) research tool. The administrators, and the above presenting plasma physicist, have become masterful in obscuring that fact when presenting to the public and to the press. The announced December 5, 2024, experiment included a weapons related target material, inserted to expose it to the prompt flux of 14.1 MeV fusion neutrons. The fusion shot experiment took about a week to set up and resulted in a nuclear fusion reaction that lasted approximately 0.000,000,000,08 second. The released energy was about enough to boil two liters of water. The energy to drive the laser was more than 100 times greater. It has been estimated that the target assembly, that was vaporized in the experiment, cost approximately $100,000. The use of the term 'ignition' is deceptive. There was only minor propagation of the reaction in the extremely compressed fuel plasma. Most of the extremely expensive fuel was blasted away from the reaction center before it had a chance to react. Later a staff member admitted that only approximately 4% of the supplied fuel actually reacted. The NIF lab administrators have suggested that newer diode pumped lasers could overcome the poor laser efficiency. They don't mention that such lasers don't exist at energy levels anywhere close to that of the NIF lasers and if the the wavelength has to be shifted to the deep UV region then that will reduce the efficiency. No mention was made that NIF was expected to achieve the so called break-even fusion reaction by 2012 but it failed by a factor of more than ten. It took a decade of additional work to finally achieve the original goal. It's been estimated that NIF has consumed approximately $11 billion in federal revenues.

Many nuclear fusion energy experiment breakthrough announcements focus upon the future promises while failing to provide details regarding actual experiment. In many cases the announcement is about reaching higher temperatures, or longer plasma duration. In many of those cases no use of fusion fuel is employed, or even planned. Currently the market value of radioactive tritium is approximately $30,000 per gram. It certainly isn't as common as the hydrogen (1H) in seawater. The few reactors that produce tritium are slated to be decommissioned within a few decades.

Nuclear fusion will only succeed if a demonstration plant is created that appears to be economically practical to commercial enterprises that want a return on their investment.

Those who work in nuclear energy fields, along with the vast majority of the 8.0+ billion other humans on Earth, have become masterful at excluding the following warnings from their consciousness. They desperately want to believe that our technological wizardry can turn this 'Titanic' around before it is to late. I urge readers to search for the following two article titles.

IPCC report: ‘now or never’ if world is to stave off climate disaster (TheGuardian)

UN chief: World has less than 2 years to avoid 'runaway climate change' (TheHill)
* This statement was made 5 years ago.

Ответить
@michaelgonzalez9058
@michaelgonzalez9058 - 14.03.2024 22:36

Make the ai the concept of absorbsion of the atom and nano of an electro dynamics quantum state

Ответить
@michaelgonzalez9058
@michaelgonzalez9058 - 14.03.2024 22:33

If a robot were to be adjusted to tell data of the fusion of the power of the sun

Ответить
@williamschacht
@williamschacht - 04.03.2024 02:47

Watching the simulations in this video are exciting! More videos with the main focus on the mathematical modeling/numerical simulation aspects would be extremely interesting. Why do they make the pellets so smooth with such precision? Nature is so non-linear and fractal it seems that they are "looking in the wrong direction?"

Ответить
@Freq412
@Freq412 - 14.02.2024 00:17

Did the ignition equation include the energy spent producing the fuel pellet? Or is it a negligible quantity?
When the lasers fire, and when they compress the fuel pellet is it loud?
Does it cause significant wear and tear on the capacitor banks, SCR's, bussing or switchgear?

Ответить
@Dra741
@Dra741 - 27.01.2024 06:47

The problem with the Hologram is that it was not spherical and it was not able to contain and control the neutrons and they had another words if you going to extract energy from something make it like around spear don't make it like the whole ramp all these neutrons and everything is hitting every particles and everything before it could contain you can't contain the field, that's what I'm saying you can't contain the field you can hit the hall around with 60 million degrees temperature but all of the energy is going the neutrons are going to take over and it can't work, it can't work because the Hologram is not round everything dealing with this test of 20 billion of a second it has to be Sparkle it has to contain all of the energy that we put in it neutrons are going everywhere, you can't have that and that's why it didn't work on the first experiment, birthday you know I had to tweak him a little bit but then they figured out if you're going to have a fusion reaction that all of the energy must be contained in the same space like a circle like the sun

Ответить
@Dra741
@Dra741 - 27.01.2024 06:42

Thank you Lawrence Livermore and I knew that you was going to do it in 5 years I calculated it precisely

Ответить
@roland9340
@roland9340 - 05.01.2024 00:05

A year hv bn passed since dec 2022. What now?...

Ответить
@calebstoddard9660
@calebstoddard9660 - 03.01.2024 14:20

Hey how can we as a people donate?

Ответить
@Taffeyboy
@Taffeyboy - 31.12.2023 02:39

So how many of these little fusion pellets are consumed in say an hour of operation?

Ответить
@fckidiots6996
@fckidiots6996 - 26.12.2023 05:06

Congratulations guys. A very important step.

Ответить
@RabidGoose22
@RabidGoose22 - 23.12.2023 08:53

When you say we got 150% energy out. How did we measure that? Did we heat water, turn a turbine and produce that many KWHs? Are are you just guessing based on a sensor?

Ответить
@robert84_
@robert84_ - 20.12.2023 10:44

So in Magic:the Gathering terms, this is like spending 2 mana to gain 3 mana. The possibilities are endless 🌌

Ответить
@deltonlomatai2309
@deltonlomatai2309 - 19.12.2023 09:52

Fusion is great. Not wholly clean, the tritium and deuterium produces neutrons.

Ответить
@diegomanrique4716
@diegomanrique4716 - 15.12.2023 18:15

SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory

Ответить
@analog_guy
@analog_guy - 13.12.2023 01:41

We must not belittle the effort the folks at the National Ignition Facility have put into this, but it is appropriate to criticize the hype they have put out. They simply got really excited because they finally achieved what they originally claimed they would achieve no later than about a decade prior. It was not a breakthrough. It was merely a modest step up in energy released as compared to a similar test they did a year or so earlier.

Three megajoules sounds like a lot. How much energy is three megajoules? Three megajoules is three million watt-seconds. In comparison, one kilowatt-hour is three point six million watt-seconds. I pay about twelve cents per kilowatt-hour for electric energy delivered to my home. So, if they could convert the energy to electricity and deliver it to a user at 100% efficiency, it would be worth about ten cents. They stated that if they could have caused all the fuel in the pellet to fuse, they would have released about 40 times more energy, if I remember correctly. So that would have been worth about four dollars assuming they could convert all the released energy to electricity.

Using their present approach to releasing the energy, they have to procure the deuterium-tritium fuel, cryogenically cool it, place it in a micron-tolerance diamond sphere, place that inside a precisely made hohlraum tube containing gold as well as other expensive stuff, precisely place the assembly in position, and blast it with 192 huge lasers. It should be clear that they are not on a path to achieve the dream of cheap abundant clean energy for the world.

At the time of announcing their “breakthrough”, they said they expected to repeat the experiment on about a monthly basis, and expected to continue to extend the energy released. Since then, it has been about a year and so far they have announced only one shot that released any more energy than the “breakthrough” achievement. Since the 1950’s, there has been no doubt that mankind can release more energy through fusion than the energy put in (think hydrogen bombs), but the question remains whether we will ever have a cost-effective commercial power source using fusion produced on earth. I hope these folks can at least succeed in their primary mission of assuring nuclear deterrence.

Ответить
@Atlchamp1ife
@Atlchamp1ife - 06.12.2023 05:46

🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

Ответить
@merlepatterson
@merlepatterson - 05.12.2023 23:30

"Fusion Energy" is a pleasant sounding term, but for energy generation, viable fusion energy production will most likely be hundreds of years out, if ever. Stars do it so easily because gravity is plentiful (and free) at the core of a star. Not so much in a building on the surface of the earth. Thus, the energy requirements needed to compensate for the lack of gravitational energy will always vastly outweigh the useful energy output. But any first year physics major knows this.

Ответить
@heartofdawn2341
@heartofdawn2341 - 05.12.2023 20:33

While ignition is definitely worth celebrating, this whole thing feels deliberately misleading. Sure you got more energy out of the pellet than what went into it, but the the system as a whole is still a massive energy sink. That laser power didn't come for free.

This is disingenuous at best and an outright lie of omission at worst. While the public may be fooled, those that follow science news and subscribe to channels like this most certainly will not.

And the big questions still remain; how do you plan to have a net energy gain, and how do you plan to do it reliably, repeatably, and cost-effectively enough to be a viable power source?

I get it; a lot of work has gone into this and some really great science has come out, and you are proud of that. Rightly so. But hyping it as the future of power generation is not even wrong

Ответить
@Erik-rp1hi
@Erik-rp1hi - 05.12.2023 20:29

I read or watched on you tube ITER is going to be able to breed Tritium. How is the LLNL going to produce the stuff for the NIF?
Also I read new Pit production is going to happen at Los Alamos and a plant on the East Coast. New Pits still need the testing by the LLNL for their viability? Rocky Flats shut down years ago.

Ответить
@JonDeth
@JonDeth - 05.12.2023 20:14

So, they collide and generate/release potential. More out than in doesn't violate physics because the energy potential already exists, and you need to initiate the reaction to release it. Mentioning Einstein still sickens me though.
His equation only regards defined systems with known mathematical conditions and the conversion of one mass into another, and how much energy can be generated and recovered during the length of time it runs on X amount of source within that known and defined system.

This is why the reference to Einstein rubs me the wrong way. His theory is just so greatly misunderstood, and people reference him to convince the general public of laymen of anything. I have invented systems that will produce far more out than in, but again, it's a misleading statement and must be explored further within the systems I have invented.

Ответить
@JigilJigil
@JigilJigil - 05.12.2023 20:09

Great video.

Ответить
@duggydo
@duggydo - 05.12.2023 19:11

In another hundred years, maybe we will have a facility big enough to actually be useful

Ответить
@VariantAEC
@VariantAEC - 05.12.2023 18:38

Uh... is whole video is a joke?
The laser pulse is measured in femtoseconds the amount of energy produced is about that of a couple hundred matchstick heads burning themselves down to nothing.

You need to store the energy to make the laser pulse first. Was there enough energy made by the reaction to recharge those lasers?
No.

So why not? The laser efficiency is very low. Only a small percentage (around 1-3%) of the electricity stored in the capacitors is output as photons in the laser beam. Most of the electrical energy is wasted as non-laser emission heat because the diodes are nowhere near capable of converting anything even close to the majority of electricity into a laser.

This is not the perpetual energy machine that fusion promised to be and the reason is clear. You can't cheat nature (aka: the laws of physics).

This wasn't a breakthrough.

Ответить
@VariantAEC
@VariantAEC - 05.12.2023 18:24

The energy needed to prime the lasers was way more than the energy released by the lasers.

Fusion Ignition was therefore not actually achieved.

[Edit: "needee" corrected.]

Ответить