Комментарии:
Anton, youd be a great teacher. In ways you remind me of my earth and space science teacher from high school.
ОтветитьUSB. I thought you were talking about England, 😉. (It's a joke from another channel. Just checking to see who knows.... or what USC is? Lol)
ОтветитьPlanet Engulfment Event: PEE 🤔 🤣🤣🤣
ОтветитьIf the planet orbits that close to its star wouldn't it be basically molten and not solid. A blob of magma. That kind of planet might not break apart like rocky planets do because it doesn't have solid structure.
ОтветитьI must have been hiding under a rock because Chthonian planets are new to me. Fascinating.
ОтветитьHas anyone else walked in outside lately.....when the.Sun was bakin.......not the same..........not the same
ОтветитьLOL. Sailor Moon promise of a rose predicted this.
ОтветитьReminds me of SciFi author Robert L. Forward's Dragon's Egg and Star Quake that I read around 25 years ago. First time I found another mention of my independently invented idea of fluid suspension to deal with high G-forces. I'm sure many others invented the idea too, most great ideas are like that. Anyway, brilliant books, great hard SciFi that puts you in a very different scenario and then pushes the science to see if there is a visble alternate reality, in this case, for the inhabitants, the "Heechee". One of the ideas considered in the book is g-force differential between minute orbital radius variance at very high orbital speeds of an intense gravity of a neutron star from not far away. An example of the short distance providing the g-force variance, being between feet and head.
ОтветитьWow,how hot would the plasma get at the leading face of a USP ?!!
ОтветитьHi Anton. This was simply perfect: a little perfect lesson with the usual perfect examples and complete documents... ❤❤❤ I am always impressed: complete, clear and rich in such short videos.. thank you so much ❤❤❤❤
Ответить5 hours around a star?
What velocity would that be?
In only 3D space there would be no change in states. So without the dimension of time everything is a snapshot 😮
ОтветитьThank you for these fascinating videos Anton. Wish some of the physics teachers in school were like you! That would have made physics so much fun. Honestly, it is mostly Latin to me but you make it so easy to understand! Thanks for that too!
ОтветитьThought there was a smudge on my screen at about 35 seconds lmao
ОтветитьGreat post Anton, Thank you. Ties in with a theory I had as a teen that was dismissed at the time - hey ho, we got there eventually and that is what matters. 👍👍👍
ОтветитьThank you Anton
ОтветитьBut can it play Minecraft?
ОтветитьThis answers the age-old question, "What do you get if you strip Uranus down to its core?"
ОтветитьThose stars and planets had the evolution restriction failsafe activated . 😉
ОтветитьI follow Anton for the inevitable “it’s Aliens”. Who knows, maybe the next stellar megastructure will force his hand.
ОтветитьP.E.E. - Planet Engulfment Event
ОтветитьNOPE.
ОтветитьAhh, that's why we can't find Vulcan. Already eaten by Sol :P
>
M class Star: "Num, num, num, ahhh more mass, more energy ᕙ(⇀‸↼‶)ᕗ "
Unique is a binary. There are no degrees of unique.
ОтветитьWhat would time dilation be like there
ОтветитьNice beard, are you learning how to play the bongo's?
ОтветитьWhat if planet 9 was engulfed by sun in past...while settling other planets orbit
ОтветитьThats crazy: as soon as you are done singing happy birthday you would almost have to start up again
ОтветитьThanks again Anton. Question, when you say in 400k years it will be engulfed. Does that include how long it takes for the light to reach earth. Since we are observing things in the past. Thx
ОтветитьThat was fast😀🙃
ОтветитьI always wonder why when a category is invented by humans, we use some odd unit like 'one day' rather than somw ratio of the parent body to the USP.
ОтветитьAnton, are you going to talk about the fast moving CWISE J1249 ?
ОтветитьTerrestrial ot testicle 😂
ОтветитьSo many fascinating planets -- so little time.
ОтветитьHi Anton I have a theory but don't want to explain it to anyone else yet until I have talked to someone with lots of scientific knowledge like you and was hoping you might reach out to listen to this interesting theory
ОтветитьI'd be nearly 80,000 years old if I somehow lived on that planet.
ОтветитьAs a not bot I ❤ Russian Scientist 🥼
ОтветитьIf not spherical, should it be called a planet? /s
Ответить🤜⚡💥⚡🤛 My comment to Anton's earlier video "One of the Largest Stars Known Dimmed Just Like Betelgeuse" -- don't be surprised when a red supergiant splits into 2 stars or ejects a hot object[s] that will cool to form a planet[s]. is relevant here, Conventional science is oblivious to this fact... for now, but evidence/observations will force this conclusion. Another observation/fact they will have to concede is that stars of same or similar class will, on average, have similar types of planets with the exception of stars whose Birkeland current has gone through a structural and energetic change in the past which occurs frequently. Variable output stars/objects demonstrate this. Other electrical phenomena affect the aforementioned which add to variations. 🤜⚡💥⚡🤛
Ответить5 hours for a year? Longevity hack unlocked 🧐
ОтветитьThanks!
ОтветитьFor some time there has been the idea that Mercury is the core of an ice giant. There should be an effort to compare Mercury with these hot Earths.
ОтветитьWhen we say “planets that are out there” we could also say “planets that “were out there” it twists my melon that so much we “see” is so far back in time it could all be destroyed and we wouldn’t know- so does that mean that the universe is in superposition? 🤔 🤷♂️🤦🏻♂️😂
ОтветитьImagine if we could survive on that planet. The time dilation would be psychotic.
ОтветитьAny news on Cwise J1249?
Ответить😮😎🤔😊
ОтветитьI'm fascinated by what a tide locked Chthonian might be like. Once the atmosphere is lost, the dark side could cool, and there might be places near the terminator with tolerable temperatures.
ОтветитьWhy not call a planet engulfment event what it is, a PEE? 😂
ОтветитьHad to watch twice but I heard you,: 400 million years from today.....that's accuracy!
Ответить