Комментарии:
How much electromagnetic force/energy is needed to pull like a gram of material out of how much quantum field area?
ОтветитьMagnetar casimir effect short burst electromagnetic field. How short radio burst achieved with colliding asteroid is the short radioburst due to the casimir effect. As this obect falls in the field the super strong magnetic field is generated to produce the electromagnetic burst by gravity accelerating the object as the metal object falls the field is generated by the Maxwell effect. The burst generated by the field produces a huge electromagnetic burst as it falls, when nearing the event surface the casimir effect releases a huge burst from both the field and gravity acceleration.
Ответитьgod is dead
ОтветитьI’m just trying to figure out how all these advertisements you disrespect us with have anything to do with “creating something from nothing”.
I didn’t fucking come here for advertisements. Get off your ass and get a job, like everybody is expected to.
So does this mean a Zimbabwean drop out has actually invented an EV that drives forever on nothing, or am I being too optimistic?
ОтветитьSo does this mean a Zimbabwean drop out can really from a car forever on radio waves from space; or quanta?
ОтветитьOnce again, I find where someone has said "there is nothing" something vital overlooked
it's not nothingness, it's quantum flux
nothing cannot exist - never has, never will - STUPID atheists!
Nothig is something
ОтветитьThe dude is so full of 💩. The title states making matter out of nothing, but first, we need something…magnetic fields and everything that goes with that. Really?
ОтветитьSafire project
ОтветитьEVOs or plasma
ОтветитьIs this dielectric breakdown and very similar to the effect known as the avalanche effect used to amplify photoelectric signals in avalanche photodiodes (APDs)?
ОтветитьCalling particles "nothing" is where I'm lost at...ok the universe started from nothing, but particles (something) was there....I'm confused
ОтветитьI assume that they did the experiment in a vacuum, but can't get rid of gravity and magnetic fields, so stating that they found proof while two forces are still there that they don't understand is an unscientific statement!
ОтветитьIt's created by em field decaying
ОтветитьStrong magnetic fields are not “nothing”.
ОтветитьThis video should be named, 1st Law of Thermodynamics Disproven!!!! Charrrr!!!! You need a Nobel Prize, well done!!! 1) That means the first law of Thermodynamics is wrong, and everything based on it, which is a lot of things!! 2) Logically, Nothing can't give rise to Something!!!! The Universe is going to get very strange indeed!!! 3) Your definition of Nothing has something in it!!! So it's Something to begin with, NOT Nothing!!! But great video, I enjoyed it, thank you.
ОтветитьA void would have no energy and for a void to just spontaneously crest energy is a phenomenon we have no idea how it would occur, let alone a void existing in any kind of way just because in some reality that we can’t even begin to explain at a higher level than “the universe exists”
ОтветитьHow interesting !!! 😊
ОтветитьSomething out of nothing, Magnetic fields, pick one lol
ОтветитьDoes this discovery give any credence to Pais' HEEMFGs (high energy electromagnetic field generators)? Supposedly it is capable of making electromagnetic field gradients in excess of the Schwinger limit.
ОтветитьZero raised to the zero power = 1
ОтветитьMaximum nothingness? You can have maximum amount of petroleum in a tank but that presupposes you have the gas and the tank which are.. something. Nothing means there is not anything. No time, space, energy, matter: no thing.
So, please rethink your video
Where did the fields come from? 😮💨
ОтветитьTbh need this knowledge for a future anime k thanks Byyeeeee 👋
Ответитьvented by stupidity
ОтветитьSay... Has anybody done a thermodynamic walkthrough of the Calvin cycle? I'll search it in a while, but I'd love to see a running total of energy puts and takes as you walk through from light converting H2O to H2 and O... I'm not a chemist but you can see what I mean right?
ОтветитьYou are wrong. There is NO Instance of nothing in the Universe. By definition, nothing is not possible in our Universe. There is also no explanation of how you get our Universe out of nothing.
ОтветитьWho made the design of something, who made the idea?
ОтветитьIs nothing really nothing in this case,l don't think so but at the edge of the expanding universe there many actually be what we would call nothing but it would be undefinable as no time or space or concepts as distance even exist yet.
ОтветитьHow can you say something from nothing when you literally use SOMETHING to make it???
ОтветитьThings only1 appear to slow down when you get closer to the speed of light because of lag. Lag is time dilation. You get the same data in the amount of time but its sppears slower and is perceived as being slower due to lag. Lag is the universes "gpu" being overloaded and basically "loading" like a video game.
Ответитьand how do you know that before the univerese there was or is a quantum electric field outside?...
ОтветитьThis is silly and unscientific to suggest but, I will not be surprised if we some time in the near future detect a subtle wind of particles or just hydrogen coming from the empty voids between galaxies moving in towards the filaments. Feels like where empty space is created matter is created also.
ОтветитьI've seen experiments where two heavy objects are left near each other with no friction and their gravitational attraction gradually pulls them together over a period of days, I assume the Schwinger effect factors this.
ОтветитьThe Schwinger effect is a good way to shut theists up about creationism.
Ответитьso there are electromagnetic fields, quantum fields and space. that's pseudo-nothing.
ОтветитьIt isn't from nothing, it is from everything. Infinite objects have this property.
ОтветитьNo, not out of nothing. Empty space is not empty. It has photons passing through it as well as electron neutrinos and dark matter muon neutrinos.
ОтветитьSomething from nothing, is stage magic. How much magnetism does a scientist need to produce an elephant?
ОтветитьMC²=E
Ответить1 yr ago... any "more recent info"? Has me wondering about the thing with capacitors and vacuum... and other things... resonance, etc?
ОтветитьSchwing!
ОтветитьEnergy underlies the universe. It existed before the big bang. According to the law of conservation of energy, energy can neither be created nor destroyed. This being the case, then the energy that made it possible for the big bang to take place must have existed prior to the event (the event did not create it) which would indicate that the source of this energy was in existence prior to the big bang and the creation of the 3-dimensional universe. This then raises the question: What is the nature of this source?
ОтветитьThe vacuum of space is "virtually" empty and "virtually" nothing. Because it is empty of and nothing we can see, feel, touch, or otherwise sense. But it is truly something. It is just that its make up is too incrementally small, smaller than all known particles, that we cant directly sense it.
ОтветитьNo you can't! It has never been proven. You use electromagnetic fields. First it took scientists to do it, they are not nothing. Then electromagnetic was used, which is also not norhing. Quantum fields are not nothing also. Things are created out of something. Which quite frankly and simply is energy.
The vacuum of space is quantum eneryg, hence matter is created from something, vacuum energy.
So it is possible to create something out of nothing as long as you have a few things to start with?
ОтветитьSo basically when you have nothing, you still have the possibility of something, and that possibility can create everything.
Ответить