Democracy’s discontent with Prof. Michael Sandel | Google Zeitgeist

Oligarchy's Discontent

Audience is terrible. They can't straight-forwardly answer Prof. Sandel's questions. Some others are just starring at their phones.

The professor said more presentations would address solutions. How can I find them?

It is insulting to assume work that pays less is less necessary or respectable. However, it is inescapable that the pay is determined by supply and demand. When more is needed or less is available, the pay increases unless arbitrary restraints such as government mandates or prohibitions exist.

Welfare-to-work and other assorted requirements and conditionalities on receiving social assistance and public services, are all different ways of saying: "you are less worthy of support and less of a citizen than others".

The audience just could not accept the fact that they were actually (in reality) supporting what John S. Mill suggested, because they want to appear politically correct.
But, let's face it, educated people are better at analysing problems and strategising solutions. So, it is inevitable having more of them in governments and parliaments. And, we all would agree (I suppose), it is for the better of our societies.

There was a lawyer whose voice was above the law. Many respected him for some good reasons & his son, not a lawyer, inherited his infamous characteristics that led Perils to Democracy for 20 decades.
I disagree that the well-educated/professionals make better decisions.

I do believe “Elites” should rule, but the problem here is the poor definition of elites. And we should also admit there should be a good definition of different categories of elites.

Jones Joseph Martinez Ronald Rodriguez Betty

The notion that the average garage worker or asphalt layer is providing as much benefit to society as any professor is something academics find hard to wrap their head around.

Prof.Sandel is pure legend.

Bearded lawmakers make bearded laws.
What if all the choices you are given are authoritarian?
What if all, or the majority of your representatives have fallen under the threat of blackmail? What we should try is a direct democracy ❤️

Great talk! I enjoyed it. Thanks again for sharing it on this channel. Very nutritional content.

"Democracy's Discontent" reflects a growing sense of dissatisfaction with democratic systems, particularly as they grapple with deepening social, economic, and political divides. At its core, this discontent arises from the gap between democratic ideals and the realities of modern governance, where inequalities persist, political polarization intensifies, and citizens often feel alienated from the political process. While democracy promises equality, participation, and freedom, the growing influence of special interest groups, corporate power, and media manipulation can undermine these principles, leaving many to question whether democracy truly serves the public good.

This discontent is also fueled by a perceived erosion of trust in democratic institutions and leaders, compounded by widespread cynicism about the effectiveness of democratic processes in addressing pressing global challenges such as climate change, economic inequality, and systemic racism. Many feel that while democracy promises empowerment, it often results in gridlock, inefficiency, and a lack of meaningful change. As a result, the dissatisfaction with democracy isn't just about political outcomes, but about the very mechanisms through which political power is exercised, leading to calls for reform or even questioning of democratic legitimacy itself.

However, despite these frustrations, democracy remains a powerful framework for addressing injustice and advancing collective well-being. The discontent with democracy can also serve as a catalyst for renewal and transformation, prompting a reimagining of democratic values and institutions that are more inclusive, responsive, and capable of meeting the complex challenges of our time. Ultimately, "Democracy's Discontent" calls for a critical reassessment of how democracy functions in practice and how it can be strengthened to better reflect the needs and aspirations of all citizens.

What if I don’t English?

REPRESENTATION as response to POLARIZATION

GRINGOLAND IS NOT A DEMOCRACY BUT A PLUTOCRACY

As of February 3, 2023* some 94% of the US Congress, roughly 9 out of 10 members, had a University/College [4-year] degree, with the majority of those having a secondary degree as well. The last time TWO-THIRDS of the Congress did not have at least a 4-year degree to their name was nearly a century ago... the 79th Congress from 1945/46 saw 56 percent of House members holding a 4-year degree with something like 75% of Senators holding one too. It is difficult to find members of Congress who are not educated at a University or College level today. "The share of members in each chamber with at least a bachelor’s degree peaked in the 116th Congress (2019-20), when 96% of representatives and all 100 senators had one. Although both shares have remained high, they have slightly declined since then."

*SOURCE: Pew Research Center, U.S. House and Senate biographical data.

Telling a bunch of elite Googlers that their disrespect of the people they proudly exclude from power (hiring only the "best and brightest" and "rewarding high-performers") led directly to the election of Donald Trump is is not going to get him invited back for another talk ;)

It is because it is unsympthtic thats all make it. More fair if it will ever do so is the problem😅😅😅

The party is over so now is the time critise it not while it was enjoyable got it 😅😅

Explain is democracy ideology.unsymaphetic
Along with the theory 😂😂

So the guy from Egypt was right, it was a trick question from the prof. He wanted the answer the second guy from Uganda gave so he could throw in Stuart Mills answer. Very week performance for a Google meet.

Michael Sandel recognizes that listeners can't make good decisions. Michael Sandel tries to give the listeners hints. However, the audience does not understand the question.