Intel's path forward 'is to break the company into two', says Susquehanna's Chris Rolland

I read that the new 3-D Gate technology was only spitting out about a 10% yield...hot damn! Well, I was laidoff a couple weeks back with severence....maybe a good thing...but my manager was chit anyways.

They are finished. AMD has overtaken them and wont look back. Next Qualcomm and Nvidia will start eating the entirity of X86 marketshare

>>>From $37K to $65K that's the minimum range of profit return every month I think it's not a bad one for me, now I have enough to pay bills and take care of my family....

Manufacturing--fabrication--is not a relic of "a decade or two past." Sheesh. If that were correct, TSMC would be "a relic." What happened is the intel BOARD hired a succession of FOUR HORRENDOUSLY bad CEO bean-counters who let the fabrication side of the business--specifically, process innovation--spiral out of control. It's the BOARD'S fault, or if you want to get specific, it's the fault of those four horrible CEOs who knew NOTHING about running a super high technology business or maintaining an appropriately scaled workforce like Intel but knew everything about moving money around and promising a high dividend that was never reasonable. Intel, if managed correctly, could be the unstoppable juggernaut it once was, but it would have taken a visionary CEO who understands chip fabrication, and that person was not to be found on the board or in the C suite. Intel got what it deserved.