Christian Claims Quran has Contradictions‼️ GETS DEBUNKED ft. Shaykh Uthman

Nothing matters to Christians, they have their own beliefs.
It doesn't matter what Jesus said. It doesn't matter if there are contradictions...
They really believe in Fairytales..

The Noble Glorious Qur'an is protected and preserved by The One who gave it to Jibraeel A.S. to go and relay it to our Beloved Prophet Muhammad PBUH.

We The Muslims have been openly challenging the non believing folk from the day The Noble Glorious Qur'an was given to our Beloved Prophet Muhammad PBUH YET no one has found 1 contradiction or untruth .... Some of those who took up the challenge for money and riches failed miserably and others who were sincere accepted the truth and reverted back to
Al Islam.

I wonder why Christian couldnt accept the fact that they worship 3 gods?

ما الدنيا كلها من أولها إلى آخرها
إلا كرجل نام نومة، رأى في منامـه ما يحب ثم انتبه

really what makes someone to be able to see the truth is in this convo especially the fact he can't elaborate his own creed like this is what you believe in you can't put it into words !!

He can claim anything in this world but for claiming against Qur'an he did not even check it ..
Guess his mind is corrupted 😊

سبحان الله المتكبر

Can someone explain to me why caliph uthman had to burn original manuscripts of the Quran to produce his own version. WHY BURN IF THE MANUSCRIPTS DONT HAVE ANY CONTRADICTIONS. What was he hiding that he couldn't wait for us to verify if he is telling the truth.

ALSO For your information, do you know why rabbinic Jews ignorantly claim that you Muslims are nearer to them than Christians although there is no connection between the Jewish tanakh and your Quran.

It is within your knowledge that Tanakh is also Christians old testament word for word .

The Jews claim Yahweh is monotheistic like Allah but in their book of Exodus, rabbinic Jews can't explain why the God of Moses who appeared to him in a burning bush was refered to us THE ANGEL OF THE LORD and was calling himself I Am Who I Am (a divine name)

They can't explain who this Angel of the Lord on the burning bush is who refers to himself as Yahweh, a title no angel uses. Don't forget they also have verses in their own books that also has SPIRIT OF THE LORD calling himself as Yahweh.

All this points to trinity coz together with the Father, they have Angel of the Lord ( JESUS the Son of God) who is divine and Spirit of the Lord who is divine WHICH SHOWS TRINITY AS YAHWEH AND THE ULTIMATE TRUTH.

People often attribute the differences in Qiraat and Ahruf as differences in dialect, but this is not correct because of the sahih hadith below.

In the hadeeth of ‘Umar ibn al-Khattaab who said: “I heard Hishaam ibn Hakeem reciting Soorat al-Furqaan in a manner different from that in which I used to recite it and the way in which the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) taught me to recite it. I was about to argue with him whilst he was praying, but I waited until he finished his prayer, and then I tied his garment around his neck and seized him by it and brought him to the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) and said, ‘O Messenger of Allah, I heard this man reciting Soorat-al-Furqaan in a way different to the way you taught it to me.’ The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said to him, ‘Recite it,’ and he recited it as I had heard him recite it. The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said, ‘It was revealed like this.’ Then he said to me, ‘Recite it,’ so I recited it and he said, ‘It was revealed like this.’ This Qur'aan has been revealed in seven different ways, so recite it in the way that is easiest for you.’”

(Narrated by al-Bukhaari, 2287; Muslim, 818)

One thing to note here is that Hishaam AND Umar are Qurayshi and the Qurayshi ONLY had one dialect. Why would Umar have an issue with how the Qur'an was being recited if they share the same dialect? It's because the style or ahruf was different meaning different words were used that were different from each other.

Let's take an example of Qur'an 17:102 and compare the Al-Kisa'i vs the other recitations (Hafs, Warsh, Al Duri, etc...):

Al-Kisa'i's Recitation: "قَالَ قَدْ عَلِمْتُ" (qāla qad ʿalimtu) translates as "I have known," implying Moses is speaking about his own certainty of Pharaoh’s knowledge of the truth.

Other Recitations: "قَالَ قَدْ عَلِمْتَ" (qāla qad ʿalimta) translates as "You have known," meaning Moses is addressing Pharaoh directly, asserting that Pharaoh knows the signs are from God.

Al-Kisa'i's Recitation ("I have known") suggests that Moses is declaring his own understanding, expressing his certainty that Pharaoh knows the signs are true, possibly as an indirect appeal to Pharaoh’s conscience.

Other Recitations ("You have known") place the emphasis directly on Pharaoh, accusing him of knowingly rejecting the signs despite recognizing their divine origin.

Now the central theme or meaning of the verse does not change because it is talking about Pharaoh's inability to see the truth despite having signs shown to him, but we have a contradiction in what was said by Moses. Did Moses say, "I have known" or "You have known"? He could not have said both, bear in mind that this verse is quoting Moses's speech. How do you reconcile on what exactly was said by Moses? How can BOTH be correct? Moses either one thing or the other, he cannot have said both because he is being quoted for saying something at a specific event or statement.

Many Councils later, they still haven't figured out how to put it into words. How did it become a concept in the first place? Oh yeah, just believe.

You brothers do good work. 🙂

Someone with the right, unbiased mind, and who has read both Bible and Quran, should already know that Bible is corrupted

Straw man approach by the Christian.

Alhamdulillah for Islam. ❤❤❤

The Bible is a Christians kryptonite

1+98+76=1 😂

I'm not accusing or anything, but this dude's body language looks like he's high.

Home » Sahih al-Bukhari » Virtues of the Qur'an - كتاب فضائل القرآن » Hadith 4987

Sahih al-Bukhari 4987

Narrated Anas bin Malik:

Hudhaifa bin Al-Yaman came to `Uthman at the time when the people of Sham and the people of Iraq were Waging war to conquer Arminya and Adharbijan. Hudhaifa was afraid of their (the people of Sham and Iraq) differences in the recitation of the Qur'an, so he said to `Uthman, "O chief of the Believers! Save this nation before they differ about the Book (Qur'an) as Jews and the Christians did before." So `Uthman sent a message to Hafsa saying, "Send us the manuscripts of the Qur'an so that we may compile the Qur'anic materials in perfect copies and return the manuscripts to you." Hafsa sent it to `Uthman. `Uthman then ordered Zaid bin Thabit, `Abdullah bin AzZubair, Sa`id bin Al-As and `AbdurRahman bin Harith bin Hisham to rewrite the manuscripts in perfect copies. `Uthman said to the three Quraishi men, "In case you disagree with Zaid bin Thabit on any point in the Qur'an, then write it in the dialect of Quraish, the Qur'an was revealed in their tongue." They did so, and when they had written many copies, `Uthman returned the original manuscripts to Hafsa. `Uthman sent to every Muslim province one copy of what they had copied, and ordered that all the other Qur'anic materials, whether written in fragmentary manuscripts or whole copies, be burnt.

حَدَّثَنَا مُوسَى، حَدَّثَنَا إِبْرَاهِيمُ، حَدَّثَنَا ابْنُ شِهَابٍ، أَنَّ أَنَسَ بْنَ مَالِكٍ، حَدَّثَهُ أَنَّ حُذَيْفَةَ بْنَ الْيَمَانِ قَدِمَ عَلَى عُثْمَانَ وَكَانَ يُغَازِي أَهْلَ الشَّأْمِ فِي فَتْحِ إِرْمِينِيَةَ وَأَذْرَبِيجَانَ مَعَ أَهْلِ الْعِرَاقِ فَأَفْزَعَ حُذَيْفَةَ اخْتِلاَفُهُمْ فِي الْقِرَاءَةِ فَقَالَ حُذَيْفَةُ لِعُثْمَانَ يَا أَمِيرَ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ أَدْرِكْ هَذِهِ الأُمَّةَ قَبْلَ أَنْ يَخْتَلِفُوا فِي الْكِتَابِ اخْتِلاَفَ الْيَهُودِ وَالنَّصَارَى فَأَرْسَلَ عُثْمَانُ إِلَى حَفْصَةَ أَنْ أَرْسِلِي إِلَيْنَا بِالصُّحُفِ نَنْسَخُهَا فِي الْمَصَاحِفِ ثُمَّ نَرُدُّهَا إِلَيْكِ فَأَرْسَلَتْ بِهَا حَفْصَةُ إِلَى عُثْمَانَ فَأَمَرَ زَيْدَ بْنَ ثَابِتٍ وَعَبْدَ اللَّهِ بْنَ الزُّبَيْرِ وَسَعِيدَ بْنَ الْعَاصِ وَعَبْدَ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنَ الْحَارِثِ بْنِ هِشَامٍ فَنَسَخُوهَا فِي الْمَصَاحِفِ وَقَالَ عُثْمَانُ لِلرَّهْطِ الْقُرَشِيِّينَ الثَّلاَثَةِ إِذَا اخْتَلَفْتُمْ أَنْتُمْ وَزَيْدُ بْنُ ثَابِتٍ فِي شَىْءٍ مِنَ الْقُرْآنِ فَاكْتُبُوهُ بِلِسَانِ قُرَيْشٍ فَإِنَّمَا نَزَلَ بِلِسَانِهِمْ فَفَعَلُوا حَتَّى إِذَا نَسَخُوا الصُّحُفَ فِي الْمَصَاحِفِ رَدَّ عُثْمَانُ الصُّحُفَ إِلَى حَفْصَةَ وَأَرْسَلَ إِلَى كُلِّ أُفُقٍ بِمُصْحَفٍ مِمَّا نَسَخُوا وَأَمَرَ بِمَا سِوَاهُ مِنَ الْقُرْآنِ فِي كُلِّ صَحِيفَةٍ أَوْ مُصْحَفٍ أَنْ يُحْرَقَ‏.‏

It is not correct for a Muslim to say the bible was corrupted. The bibles mere existence is the actual corruption. The Torah revealed to Musa, and the Injil revealed to Jesus served their purposes, and have been abrogated by the Qur'an. Mankind is presently in the era of the Qur'an.

oh i see what he is trying to do , he admits his bible has errors so he tries to make Quran same , pathetic move

Just the tone of the Christian's voice is telling me he doesn't believe in everything his saying.

I never understood how someone who doesn’t understand Arabic can claim there are contradictions?

Trinity, it's just pagan concept with little bit modification..

There might words added and removed and yet thats not a problem!

Jazaakumullaahu khayran

Brother please do not say throw the Quran even for the argument.

Quran 2:97 Say, "Whoever is an enemy to Gabriel - it is [none but] he who has brought the Qur'an down upon your heart, [O Muhammad], by permission of Allah , confirming that which was before it and as guidance and good tidings for the believers."

Why do people argue Quran reveal in a cave only? Did they know that some other time the Quran was also revealed while Rasulullah, rode a camel and his companions saw the camel feet is like having a huge burden?

when he mentioned tauhid... suratul ikhlas pop up in my mind..

I seen so many videos on this where a 'Christian' trying to be smart and judge the Quran but they haven't even finish or understand the whole bible. They pick and choose with verse in the bible and stick to those as the whole truth.

I asked the same question to my brother in law who is Christian, and he still didn't provide me with an answer. It's been almost 3 years now.

❤❤❤

MashaAllah AllahuAkbar AlhumdiAllah SubhaAllah

This is one of the most respectful Christian I have ever seen

Does it matter? It's like alladin, a fairy tail. Who cares if there are versions?

Baraka ALLAHU fikum

He believe, and he is comfort with his Christianity. May Allah give him hidayah of Islam.

If things are hard or impossible to put into words, then why does every single thing in the world have names?

There are many translations of the Quran just like there are many translations of the Scriptures. I have 5 different Qurans in my home . Yes, there are contradictions and errors in the Quran . The Quran denies the Scriptural and historical FACT of the crucifixion of Jesus (4:157), proving the Quran is wrong and Muhammad is a false prophet.

We do not hold every single verse to account..... That alone says alot

COMMON SENSE CHRISTIANS
If the Bible can't get the small things right how can it be trusted to get the major thing rights?

Go and read ...learn....study fact bro...u will find the truth.....

Mash'Allah, Allahumma baarik lak ya akhy, the wish and beautiful way you handle this guy, may Allah bless you greatly. Assalamu alaykum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuh, Allahumma hafizka wa hayak'Allah.

He keeps saying i understand...but he knows nothing

God send his son once and he will send him once again. JESUS WILL COME AGAIN. This white dressed man's book also says JESUS JESUS WILL COME BACK. THAT CONFIRMS that JESUS IS THE BELOVEF SON OF GOD

if he has two father then no problem😄

When the trinity concept were brought upon...and try very hard to make realize with the ambiguous text in the bibble. 'Someone' thought, why not we put the 'trinity:father, son and spirit' passage in the bibble to hold the trinity concept. Never thought, people can make comparison to older manuscript and later go 'OOPPPss'...but always claiming 'this' is word of god, no curruption.